U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 5

1.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: A Microdialysis in Adjuvant Arthritic Rats for Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics Modeling Study of Geniposide with Determination of Drug Concentration and Efficacy Levels in Dialysate.

PD prediction and actual value of PGE2 concentrations in AA rats. Predicted values are shown by solid lines; observations are shown by hollow triangles (GE, 30 mg/kg), open circles (GE, 60 mg/kg) and hollow quadrilaterals (GE, 120 mg/kg).

Ran Deng, et al. Molecules. 2018 May;23(5):987.
2.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: A Microdialysis in Adjuvant Arthritic Rats for Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics Modeling Study of Geniposide with Determination of Drug Concentration and Efficacy Levels in Dialysate.

PK–PD profiles of GE in AA rats’ joint cavities. The time, PK and PD data were input into Phoenix WinNonlin 6.4, and the parameters of the PK–PD binding model were fitted. Each point shows the mean ± SD of six rats.

Ran Deng, et al. Molecules. 2018 May;23(5):987.
3.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: A Microdialysis in Adjuvant Arthritic Rats for Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics Modeling Study of Geniposide with Determination of Drug Concentration and Efficacy Levels in Dialysate.

The concentration–time curve of GE after oral administration. The AA rats were treated with different concentrations of GE (30, 60 and 120 mg/kg) for 7 days. Samples were collected at the same time as the administration and once every 1 h for a total of 8 h. Values are presented as means ± SD (n = 6).

Ran Deng, et al. Molecules. 2018 May;23(5):987.
4.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: A Microdialysis in Adjuvant Arthritic Rats for Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics Modeling Study of Geniposide with Determination of Drug Concentration and Efficacy Levels in Dialysate.

The concentration–time curve of PGE2. The AA rats were treated with different concentrations of GE (30, 60 and 120 mg/kg) for 7 days. Samples were collected at the same time as the administration and once every 1 h for a total of 8 h. Values are presented as means ± SD (n = 6); ## p < 0.05 vs blank group; ** p < 0.05 vs model group.

Ran Deng, et al. Molecules. 2018 May;23(5):987.
5.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: A Microdialysis in Adjuvant Arthritic Rats for Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics Modeling Study of Geniposide with Determination of Drug Concentration and Efficacy Levels in Dialysate.

The stability of RL of knee-joint microdialysis probes in vivo (n = 4, ± s). (The probe was perfused with Ringer containing GE (100 μg/mL) at a flow rate of 1 μL/min. The analytic samples were collected every l h to investigate the stability of the microdialysis probe in vivo over 8 h. Calculations for the joint microdialysis probe were made according to the reduction method formula: R in vivo = (Cperfusate − Cdialysis)/Cperfusate × 100%).

Ran Deng, et al. Molecules. 2018 May;23(5):987.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center