U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 6

1.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: Voice Emotion Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Users.

Accuracy rate in identification of neutral, angry, and happy prosody in NH listeners and CI users using ACE and MP3000 strategies ().

NT Jiam, et al. Hear Res. ;352:30-39.
2.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Voice Emotion Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Users.

Percent correct scores for CI users (left) and NH listeners (right) on four subtests of PEPS-C, including turn-end, affect, chunking, and contrastive stress (). As indicated by the asterisk, chunking was the only task for which CI users did not perform significantly worse than NH listeners.

NT Jiam, et al. Hear Res. ;352:30-39.
3.
Figure 6

Figure 6. From: Voice Emotion Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Users.

Graphical representation of improvements in question-statement discrimination (as measured by the PEPS-C test) in CI users after participation in melodic contour training (). Two programs of melodic contour training were administered. The “Interval” program incorporated manipulations of note intervals, whereas the “Duration” program changed the note durations, in order to make the tests more challenging. The dashed line represents chance performance.

NT Jiam, et al. Hear Res. ;352:30-39.
4.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Voice Emotion Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Users.

Cochlear implant (CI) versus normal hearing (NH) group mean proportions of question judgements as a function of an acoustic dimension (F0 height, F0 contour, peak intensity ratio, and duration ratio) (). The NH group was also subject to different listening conditions (full-spectrum, 8-, and 4-channel conditions) as depicted by different symbols.

NT Jiam, et al. Hear Res. ;352:30-39.
5.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Voice Emotion Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Users.

Mean emotion recognition scores for adult NH, adult CI, child NH, and child CI study groups across full spectrum speech and speech presented with three levels of spectral degradation (). Child and adult CI users’ performance were similar to one another’s and comparable to adult NH’s performance in 8-channel degraded speech.

NT Jiam, et al. Hear Res. ;352:30-39.
6.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Voice Emotion Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Users.

17 school-aged children were asked to discriminate sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise and to discriminate the fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband sine-phase harmonic complexes (). Children who had adult-like sensitivity were not necessarily the oldest listeners. For example, the youngest research subject was 6.5 years old and demonstrated a standardized threshold of only 1.08 semitones for AMR discrimination and 12 cents for F0 discrimination, suggesting that children’s sensitivity to pitch (regardless of the underlying cue) does not systematically improve beyond 6 years of age.

NT Jiam, et al. Hear Res. ;352:30-39.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center