U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 9

1.
Figure 9

Figure 9. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

Image of posterior uveitis taken with (a) fundoscopic EyeGo imaging and (b) fundoscopic imaging shows similar level of detail

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
2.
Figure 8

Figure 8. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

Image of corneal abscess taken with (a) anterior chamber EyeGo imaging and (b) slit lamp imaging shows similar level of detail

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
3.
Figure 6

Figure 6. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

Quality of imaging done using the anterior EyeGo attachment compared to number of images taken by users of various medical backgrounds. Notably, the figure includes the initial 25 images taken by each user

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
4.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

The EyeGo system including (a) an anterior adapter consisting of a macro lens and LED light and (b) a three-dimensional printed posterior adapter to help align a 20D lens with the phone's camera

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
5.
Figure 7

Figure 7. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

Quality of imaging done using the posterior EyeGo attachment compared to number of images taken by users of various medical backgrounds. Notably, the figure includes the initial 25 images taken by each user (23 for the retina fellow)

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
6.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

An ophthalmologist is recording a movie of the posterior segment using the EyeGo three-dimensional-printed posterior adapter in conjunction with an iPhone 5. The right hand stabilizes the smartphone and captures the image while the left hand stabilizes the lens and lifts the upper eyelid

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
7.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

Examples of normal (a) anterior and (b) posterior segment images and of subtle findings including (c) detail of all sutures in corneal transplant and (d) optic nerve cupping

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
8.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

User survey response (n = 8). Five-item Likert scale reporting each user's response to three survey questions following imaging using either the anterior EyeGo imaging attachment (n = 2), posterior EyeGo imaging attachment (n = 3), or both (n = 3)

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.
9.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India.

Patient survey responses (n = 210). Five-item Likert scale reporting each patient's response to three survey questions following EyeGo imaging with either the anterior imaging attachment (n = 72), posterior imaging attachment (n = 61), or both (n = 77)

Cassie A Ludwig, et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;64(3):191-200.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center