U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 9

2.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Time course of antinociception of 14a and 14i (n=6) in the mouse WWTW assay following ip administration of 10 mg/kg. Plotted as average +/− S.E.M. Data for 14i from ref .

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
3.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

(A) 14j (purple) in DORinactive (DORi) with key residues shown. (B) 14a (teal) in DORi with key residues shown. Dashed lines represent calculated distances between ligand and receptor residues, indicating a possible interaction between N-acetyl moiety and Tyr129 that may increase binding affinity at DORi. (C) overlay of 14j (purple) and DIPP-NH2 (orange) in DORi. (D) Overlay of 14a (teal) and DIPP-NH2 (orange) in DORi.

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
4.
Figure 6

Figure 6. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Summary of in vivo activity following ip administration, cLogP, and molecular weight (MW, g/mol) for select compounds. Compounds 14e, 14o, 14p, 14l, 14m do not display antinociception following ip administration and structures are not shown. 1see ref. for in vivo activity.

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
5.
Scheme 2

Scheme 2. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Synthesis of THQ-Containing Analogues via Condensation Reactions
(a) 3-bromopropionyl chloride (1.02 eq), K2CO3 (2.05 eq), DCM, RT (b) NaOtBu (1.05 eq), DMF, RT (c) TfOH (3 eq), DCE, RT (d) For synthesis of 6e, 6g, 6g neat Ac2O (excess), reflux (e) For synthesis of 6h: Boc2O (1.2–2 eq), DMAP (0.1 eq), DIPEA (1.2–2 eq), DCM, 60°C

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
6.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Cumulative antinociceptive dose response curves of select analogues (n=3 for all analogues, except for 14a n=6) in the mouse WWTW assay following ip administration. Plotted as average +/− S.E.M. ****, p < 0.0001 for 14a, 14f, 14i, 14j for the 10 mg/kg dose when compared to baseline. Data for 14i from ref .

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
7.
Scheme 1

Scheme 1. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Synthesis of THQ-Containing Analogues Diversified via Suzuki Coupling
(a) 3-bromopropionyl chloride (1.02 eq), K2CO3 (2.05 eq), DCM, RT, (b) NaOtBu (1.05 eq), DMF, RT (c) TfOH (3 eq), DCE, RT (d) neat Ac2O (excees), refulx, (e) For synthesis of 6a and 6d: R2Bpin (2 eq), Pd(dppf)Cl2(0.1 eq), K2CO3 (3 eq), 3:1 acetone:H2O, MW 100°C, 300 W, (f) For synthesis of 6c and 6d: R2-B(OH)2 (2 eq), Ag2O (2.5 eq), Pd(dppf)Cl2 (0.1 eq), K2CO3 (3 eq), THF, MW 100°C, 300 W (g) Bco2O (1.2-2 eq), DMAP (0.1 eq), DIPEA (1.2-2 eq), DCM, 60°C

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
8.
Scheme 3

Scheme 3. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Completion of Synthesis of THQ-Containing Analogues
(a) Dihydroquinolinone intermediate, 6a-h (1 eq), (R)-t-Butanesulfinamide (2–3 eq), THF, Ti(OEt)4 (4–6 eq), 0°C, then reflux at 75°C (b) NaBH4 (6 eq), THF, −50°C to RT, then MeOH, RT (c) HCl (6 eq), dioxane, RT (d) diBoc-DMT (1.05 eq), PyBOP (1 eq), 6Cl-HOBt (1 eq), DIPEA (10 eq), DMF, RT (e) 1:1 TFA:DCM (excess). Compounds 14i-14l previously published, see ref. . * indicates starting material was recovered, but not included in yield calculation.

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.
9.
Scheme 4

Scheme 4. From: Further Optimization and Evaluation of Bioavailable, Mixed-Efficacy µ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonists/δ-Opioid Receptor (DOR) Antagonists: Balancing MOR and DOR Affinities.

Synthesis of THN-Containing Analogues
(a) 15 (1 eq), (R)-t-Butanesulfinamide (2-3 eq), THF, Ti(OEt)4 (4-6 eq) 0°C, then refulx at 75°C (b) NaBH4 (4-6 eq), THF, −50°C to RT, then MeOH, RT (c) for synthesis of 18m, 18o, 18p: R2-Bpin (1 eq), pd(dppf)Cl2 (0.1 eq), K2CO3 (3 eq), 3:1 acetone:H2O,MW 110°C, 300 W (d) For synthesis of 18n: R2-B(OH)2 (2 eq), Ag2O (2.5 eq), pd(dppf)Cl2(0.1 eq), K2CO3 (3 eq), THF, MW 80°C, 300 W (e) HCl (6 eq), dioxane, RT(f) diBoc-DMT (1.05 eq), PyBOP (1 eq), 6Cl-HOBt (1 eq), DIPEA (10 eq), DMF, RT (g) 1:1 TFA:DCM (excess)

Aubrie A. Harland, et al. J Med Chem. ;58(22):8952-8969.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center