Olfactory, phototaxic, and activity/sleep behavioral analyses of nsyb-GAL4, nsyb-QF2 and nsyb-QF2w transgenic flies. (a) Flies were tested in groups of 50 in a 4-field olfactometer assay. Control scores are attraction index (AI), calculated for the odor quadrant over 5 mins preceding presentation of an odorant. Odorant scores are AI’s calculated for the last 5 mins of the 10 mins odor presentation. We examined a highly attractive odor, 5% apple cider vinegar in water (left); a mildly attractive stimulus, pure water (middle) and a repulsive stimulus, 5% CO2 gas (right). Numbers in bars indicate number of independent experiments for each condition. Error bars are SEM. (b) Visually-induced responses of two wild-type strains (w− and w+), nsyb-Gal4/+, nsyb-QF2/+ and nsyb-QF2w/+ were investigated in a 10-step countercurrent phototaxis assay (see Online Methods for details). Phototactic index (PI) is the average number of approaches to the light that each fly made. The PI scores of the nsyb-QF2 and nsyb-QF2w flies were comparable with those of nsyb-Gal4/+ and w+ flies. Numbers in bars indicate number of independent experiments for each condition. Error bars are SEM. (c) Daily Activity, (d) daily sleep time, (e) waking activity, and (f) sleep latency for w− (n=29 flies), nsyb-Gal4/+ (n=28), nsyb-QF2/+ (n=20), and nsyb-QF2w/+ (n=21) flies, assayed as outlined in Online Methods. Error bars represent SEM. “*”, “**”, “***”, and “n.s.” denote P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, and not significant, respectively, for all panels, as determined by the non-parametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.