U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 5

1.
Figure 2

Figure 2. Principal coordinate plot (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances between Tongue River amplicon samples.. From: Human and Environmental Impacts on River Sediment Microbial Communities.

Panel A is colored by sample location: sites B (blue), C (orange), BG (red), W (yellow), E (green), S (purple). Panel B is colored by season: fall (red) and spring (blue).

Sean M. Gibbons, et al. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97435.
2.
Figure 4

Figure 4. Relative abundance patterns of 37 functional groups (SEED Subsystems L3) that fluctuate significantly across sites (ANOVA, Bonferroni-corrected p<0.05).. From: Human and Environmental Impacts on River Sediment Microbial Communities.

For each function, abundance across sites is normalized to give a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1.0 (Z-scores denote the number of standard deviations from the mean in either direction). Dendrogram shows hierarchical clustering of functions based on profile similarity across sites. Yellow indicates higher abundance, while red represents lower abundance.

Sean M. Gibbons, et al. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97435.
3.
Figure 5

Figure 5. Net pathway flow analysis for Tongue River sediments.. From: Human and Environmental Impacts on River Sediment Microbial Communities.

Nodes on the exterior (gray circles) are KEGG pathways that contain the metabolites predicted from PRMT analysis. Central nodes represent sample sites, grouped into Coalbed (sites BG, W; green), Smalltown (sites B,E,S; pink), and Tongue Reservoir (site C; blue). Edges between sites and pathways represent the average flow for that pathway across the given sites. Edge width is the magnitude of the flow; darker colors represent positive average flow, while lighter colors are negative average flow. Exterior pathway nodes are scaled according to their p-values (i.e. the significance of their deviation from the average metagenome), where larger nodes represent smaller p-values.

Sean M. Gibbons, et al. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97435.
4.
Figure 3

Figure 3. Relative abundance profiles of 85 abundant OTUs (more than 500 reads each) whose abundance varies by site (ANOVA, Bonferroni-corrected p<0.05).. From: Human and Environmental Impacts on River Sediment Microbial Communities.

For each OTU, abundance across sites is normalized to give a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1.0 (Z-scores denote the number of standard deviations from the mean in either direction). Dendrogram on the left represents the results of hierarchical clustering of OTUs. Grey boxes indicate clusters of OTUs with similar abundance patterns (identified as clusters #1–12). Pie charts show relative proportion of phyla within each cluster. Yellow represents higher normalized abundance and red represents lower normalized abundance.

Sean M. Gibbons, et al. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97435.
5.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Location of sampling sites along the Tongue River.. From: Human and Environmental Impacts on River Sediment Microbial Communities.

The upper left inset panel highlights the study region in southeastern Montana. The main panel shows a ∼140 km stretch of the Tongue River (blue line) that was sampled for this study. The direction of water flow is south to north. Notable features include the Tongue River Reservoir Dam (orange triangle), small towns (red dots), and the Decker Coalmine (blue square). The sites are described further in the text (Methods). The satellite image was obtained from the USGS Map Viewer website (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/).

Sean M. Gibbons, et al. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97435.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center