U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 7

1.
Figure 5

Figure 5. Xbp1s is required for induction of the UPR, the HBP, and O-GlcNAc modification in heart after I/R. From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) Induction of the HBP genes, GFAT1, GNPNAT1, and PGM3, as well as GalE was analyzed in αMHC-Cre, F/F and cKO hearts 24 hrs after I/R. N = 3–4 per group.
(B) Expression of the UPR markers BiP and GRP94 was analyzed 24 hrs after I/R. N = 3–4.
(C) O-GlcNAc modification was reduced in cKO hearts compared with controls. N = 3–4. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05.
See also .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.
2.
Figure 3

Figure 3. Xbp1s drives GFAT1 expression in vivo. From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) Inducible overexpression of Xbp1s in cardiomyocytes in vivo. Xbp1s expression was suppressed by doxycycline (Dox).
(B) GFAT1 transcription was significantly induced by Xbp1s overexpression. Control (αMHC-tTA only) and TG (αMHC-tTA, TRE-Xbp1s double transgenic) mice were placed on regular water (1–3 weeks) to stimulate Xbp1s expression. Cardiac GFAT1 mRNA levels were quantified by qRT-PCR. N = 3.
(C) GFAT1 protein expression was compared between control and TG mouse hearts after 2-week induction of Xbp1s. GAPDH was used as loading control. N = 3. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05.
(D) GFAT1 protein levels and expression patterns were assessed by immunostaining. Scale bars: 50 μm.
See also .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.
3.
Figure 4

Figure 4. Xbp1s induction leads to increases in nucleotide sugars and O-GlcNAc modification. From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) Induction of Xbp1s in cardiomyocytes led to significant increases in free nucleotide sugars in heart. Control and TG mice were placed on regular water (2 weeks) to stimulate Xbp1s expression. Free nucleotide sugars were analyzed by FACE. Samples corresponding to equal amount of total cellular proteins were loaded for each mouse strain. N = 6.
(B) Induction of Xbp1s in cardiomyocytes led to augmentation of O-Glc and O-GlcNAc protein modifications. Total cellular O-linked monosaccharides were separated by FACE gel. N = 6 for each group.
(C) Cardiac induction of Xbp1s led to significant increases in O-GlcNAc protein modification, as evaluated by immunoblotting for O-GlcNAc. GAPDH was used as loading control. N = 6 for control and n = 8 for TG mice. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01.
See also .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.
4.
Figure 2

Figure 2. GFAT1 is a direct target of Xbp1s. From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) A conserved DNA motif, similar to the UPRE, was identified in the GFAT1 promoter from different species.
(B) GFAT1 promoter was stimulated by Xbp1s overexpression. The GFAT1 promoter activity was measured by a luciferase assay upon Xbp1s co-transfection in HEK293T cells. N = 3 for each group.
(C) Xbp1s was associated with A ChIP assay was conducted in C2C12 cells after Xbp1s overexpression. PCR amplification was performed using primers spanning the UPRE or from a distal region in the GFAT1 promoter. The triangles indicate increasing amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA for PCR reaction.
(D) GFAT1 transcription was stimulated by Xbp1s in vitro. qPCR was conducted to quantify relative mRNA levels of GFAT1 after Xbp1s overexpression in NRVM. N = 6.
(E) GFAT1 protein levels were elevated by Xbp1s induction. N = 3–4. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05.
See also .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.
5.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Induction of HBP, O-GlcNAc protein modification, and the UPR in heart by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) Protein O-GlcNAc modification was increased in the infarct zone of I/R-stressed heart. Protein levels of the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) and UPR markers were elevated in the same region. GAPDH was used as loading control. N = 3 for each group.
(B) Protein expression and localization of GFAT1 were visualized by fluorescence immunostaining in heart tissue from sham-operated and I/R animals. Arrows indicate cardiomyocytes in the ischemic region. Scale bars: 50 μm.
(C) Transcription of the HBP genes, GFAT1, GNPNAT1, and PGM3, as well as GalE, was induced in the infarct region of heart during I/R as assessed by qRT-PCR. Sham samples of 4 hrs and 24 hrs were pooled and used as control. N = 3–9.
(D) Transcription of UPR genes was induced in the infarct region of heart during I/R as assessed by qRT-PCR. N = 3–9.
(E) Xbp1s was increased in the infarct region of I/R-stressed heart. Lamin was used as loading control for nuclear extracts. * denotes a non-specific signal across all samples.
(F) Xbp1s mRNA levels were reduced in human heart following LVAD mechanical support. N = 8. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01.
See also , .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.
6.
Figure 7

Figure 7. GFAT1 is required for Xbp1s-dependent cardioprotection during I/R. From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) Experimental procedures for NRVM in vitro.
(B) Simulated I/R (sI/R) induced Xbp1s expression as assessed by qRT-PCR. N = 3.
(C) Knockdown of Xbp1 led to enhanced cell death in response to sI/R. Xbp1s expression was reduced by siRNA. Cell death was measured by LDH release. N = 3 for each group.
(D) Xbp1s overexpression protected cardiomyocytes from sI/R injury. NRVM were infected with lentivirus expressing either LacZ or Xbp1s. Cell death from sI/R was quantified by LDH measurements. N = 6.
(E) GFAT1 mRNA and protein levels were significantly induced in NRVM after sI/R. N = 3.
(F) Knockdown of GFAT1 exacerbated sI/R injury. GFAT1 expression was reduced by siRNA. NRVM were then subjected to sI/R, and cell death was assessed by LDH release. N = 3.
(G) GFAT1 overexpression protected cardiomyocytes from sI/R injury. NRVM were infected with lentivirus expressing either LacZ or GFAT1. Cell death from sI/R was quantified by LDH measurements. N = 6 for each group.
(H) GFAT1 knockdown diminished Xbp1s cardioprotection in sI/R. NRVM were first infected with LacZ or Xbp1s lentivirus. GFAT1 was reduced by siRNA. After sI/R, LDH assays were conducted. N = 3.
(I) Overexpression of GFAT1 significantly rescued cell death by Xbp1 silencing. NRVM were first infected with LacZ or GFAT1 lentivirus. Xbp1 was reduced by siRNA. After sI/R, cell death was quantified by LDH assay. N = 6 for each group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01.
(J) Inhibition of GFAT1 diminished cardioprotection by Xbp1s. Control and TG mouse hearts were processed for Langendorff analysis (ischemia 20 min; reperfusion 40 min). Cardiac function was assessed as left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP). N = 7 for control, n = 4 for TG, n = 4 for control + Azaserine (Az), and n = 4 for TG + Az. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, TG vs control, p < 0.05. #, TG vs TG + Az, p < 0.05.
See also .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.
7.
Figure 6

Figure 6. Xbp1s induction protects heart from I/R injury in vivo. From: Spliced X-box Binding Protein 1 Couples the Unfolded Protein Response to Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway.

(A) Xbp1 silencing led to increased injury from I/R. Male mice were subjected I/R. Cardiac injury was assayed by TTC staining. Blue, unaffected, viable tissue; red, area at risk; white, infarct area. Scale bars: 1 mm.
(B) Infarct area (relative to area at risk) and area at risk (relative to left ventricle) were quantified. Number of animals used is indicated.
(C) Ventricular function in cKO mice manifested significant deterioration as measured by % fractional shortening 7 days and 21 days post I/R. N = 5 for F/F and n = 7 for cKO.
(D) Left ventricular internal diameters (LVID) in diastole (left) and systole (right) were compared. N = 5–7.
(E) cKO mice developed more severe hypertrophy following I/R. N = 3–5. Scale bars: 2 mm.
(F) cKO mice manifested more robust fetal gene reactivation after I/R. N = 3–5.
(G) Xbp1s overexpression protected hearts from I/R injury. Control and TG mice were placed on normal water for 2 weeks to induce transgene expression. I/R surgery was performed and cardiac injury was assessed by TTC staining. Scale bars: 1 mm.
(H) Infarct area (relative to area at risk) and area at risk (relative to left ventricle) were quantified. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01. NS, not significant.
See also .

Zhao V. Wang, et al. Cell. ;156(6):1179-1192.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center