PMC

H/D exchange measurements on Aβ40 fibrils derived from occipital lobe tissue of patient I, detected through 2D ¹⁵N-¹³C solid state NMR spectra. (A) 2D NCA spectra of uniformly ¹⁵N,¹³C-labeled fibrils, before H/D exchange, after various periods of exchange, and after back-exchange. In all spectra, the highest contour level is normalized to the strongest crosspeak, and 16 contour levels are shown, decreasing by successive factors of 1.2. In the spectrum at 426–437 hr, arrows indicate positions of resolved or partially resolved crosspeaks that show clear reductions in intensity due to H/D exchange. (B) 2D NCACX spectra after various periods of exchange and after back-exchange, with contour levels as in panel A. (C) Structure from with residues that exhibit significant H/D exchange colored magenta. See also .

The entire Aβ40 sequence is structurally ordered in fibrils from patient I. (A, B) 2D solid state ¹⁵N-¹³C NMR spectra of uniformly ¹⁵N,¹³C-labeled Aβ40 fibrils. Panel A is a NCACX spectrum, correlating backbone ¹⁵N chemical shifts of a given residue with ¹³C chemical shifts of the same residue. Panel B is a NCOCX spectrum, correlating backbone ¹⁵N chemical shifts of a given residue with ¹³C chemical shifts of the previous residue. Only the aliphatic ¹³C regions are shown. Asterisks in panel B denote intra-residue crosspeaks and crosspeaks involving sidechain ¹⁵N signals. (C) 2D ¹³C-¹³C spectrum, obtained with 50 ms RAD mixing (left) and 2.94 ms fpRFDR mixing (right). Black labels indicate CO/C_α (left) and C_α/C_β (right) crosspeaks. Blue labels indicate additional intra-residue crosspeaks, including multiple-bond crosspeaks. Site-specific crosspeak assignments in these 2D spectra show that residues 1–40 contribute relatively strong, sharp signals, implying structural order. See also .

Evidence for different Aβ40 fibril structures in brain tissue of patients I and II. (A, B) TEM images of Aβ40 fibrils, recorded 36 hr after addition of monomeric Aβ40 to sonicated extract from occipital lobe tissue of patient II. Blue arrows indicate minima in the apparent fibril diameter, associated with a periodic twist that is absent from fibril images in . Aβ40 was uniformly ¹⁵N,¹³C-labeled at F19, V24, G25, S26, A30, I31, L34, and M35. (C) TEM image of fibrils prepared by seeding with sonicated extract from frontal lobe tissue of patient II. (D, E) 2D ¹³C-¹³C and ¹⁵N-¹³C solid state NMR spectra of Aβ40 fibrils, seeded with extract from occipital lobe tissue of patient II (blue contours) or patient I (red contours). Black lines and labels show site-specific crosspeak assignments for spectra from patient II. (F, G) 2D ¹³C-¹³C and ¹⁵N-¹³C solid state NMR spectra of Aβ40 fibrils, seeded with extract from frontal lobe tissue of patient II, with the same black lines as in panels D and E. See also .

Evidence for a single predominant Aβ40 fibril structure in brain tissue of patient I. (A) Light microscope image of cortical tissue from patient I, with immunohistochemical staining for β-amyloid using monoclonal antibody 6E10. Amyloid deposits are red or pink. (B) Negatively stained TEM image of extract from occipital lobe tissue before addition of monomeric Aβ40. Fibril fragments are circled in red. (C, D) TEM images of isotopically labeled Aβ40 fibrils, recorded 24 hr after addition of monomeric Aβ40 to sonicated extract from occipital lobe tissue. Aβ40 was uniformly ¹⁵N,¹³C-labeled at F19, V24, G25, A30, I31, L34, and M35. (E) TEM image of fibrils prepared by seeding with sonicated extract from temporal/parietal lobe tissue. (F, G) 2D ¹³C-¹³C and ¹⁵N-¹³C solid state NMR spectra of Aβ40 fibrils, seeded with extract from occipital lobe tissue. Black lines and labels show site-specific crosspeak assignments. (H, I) 2D ¹³C-¹³C and ¹⁵N-¹³C solid state NMR spectra of Aβ40 fibrils, seeded with extract from temporal/parietal lobe tissue, with the same black lines as in panels F and H. See also .

Molecular structure of Aβ40 fibrils from patient I. (A) Structure with the lowest total experimental restraint energy in Xplor-NIH calculations. The three-fold-symmetric repeat unit is shown, as viewed along the fibril growth axis. Backbone and sidechain carbon atoms are grey and green, respectively. (B) Superposition of 20 structures that are consistent with experimental restraints (PDB code 2M4J). Sidechains of the three Aβ40 molecules in the repeat unit are yellow, green, or orange. (C, D) Two views of the idealized fibril structure, created by repeating the trimeric unit 18 times with 0.48 nm displacements along the fibril axis. (E, F) Structural models for Aβ40 fibril polymorphs with three-fold and two-fold symmetry about the fibril growth axis, developed previously from solid state NMR and electron microscopy measurements on fibrils grown in vitro. Repeat units from these models are shown, calculated as regularized averages of structure bundles in PDB codes 2LMP and 2LMN, respectively. See also and .

Structural restraints on Aβ40 fibrils from patient I. (A) Residue-specific secondary ¹³C NMR chemical shifts. Non-glycine residues with positive values for C_β and negative values for CO and C_α are likely to have β-strand conformations. Open symbols indicate glycine residues. (B) Intermolecular ¹³C-¹³C dipole-dipole couplings among ¹³C-labeled methyl sites of A2 or A21 or ¹³C-labeled carbonyl sites of V12, F20, I31, or G38. Comparison with simulations for linear chains of ¹³C nuclei with various spacings indicates intermolecular distances of approximately 0.5 nm for all labeled sites, implying in-register parallel β-sheets. (C) ¹⁵N-¹³C dipole-dipole couplings between D23 C_γ and K28 N_ζ sites indicate a 0.35 ± 0.02 nm interatomic distance, implying salt-bridge interactions between oppositely charged D23 and K28 sidechains. (D) ¹⁵N-¹⁵N dipole-dipole couplings among backbone amide nitrogens. Stronger couplings for F20 and A21 indicate non-β-strand conformations. (E) Dark-field TEM image of unstained fibrils. Mass-per-length (MPL) values are obtained from integrated intensities within 300 nm X 50 nm rectangles, centered on TMV (cyan) or Aβ40 (yellow) fibril segments, after subtraction of the average background intensity from similar rectangles on either side (dotted lines). TMV particles serve as in situ MPL standards. (F) MPL histogram, with light blue dashed lines indicating MPL values expected for structures comprised of 1–5 cross-β units. Dark blue line is a best-fit Gaussian function, centered at 28.4 ± 0.3 kDa/nm and with a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) equal to 12.0 ± 0.8 kDa/nm. (G) Histogram of errors in MPL values due to noise in the dark-field images. The best-fit Gaussian function has FWHM equal to 12.8 ± 0.6 kDa/nm, showing that random noise accounts for the width in panel F. (H) MPL histogram for Aβ40 fibrils seeded with extract from occipital lobe tissue of patient II, with best-fit Gaussian function centered at 29.1 ± 1.2 kDa/nm and FWHM equal to 12.1 ± 0.8 kDa/nm. See also and .