U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 6

1.
Figure 5

Figure 5. Repeatability of the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio at 4 mm (CPTR4) in Fuchs dystrophy. From: FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL DYSTROPHY: SUBJECTIVE GRADING VERSUS OBJECTIVE GRADING BASED ON THE CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL THICKNESS RATIO.

In 7 corneas with varying severity of Fuchs dystrophy, CPTR4 was determined from 3-5 repeated measurements. The median coefficient of variation (CV) was 1.3%. Each symbol represents a different cornea.

Daniel J. Repp, et al. Ophthalmology. ;120(4):687-694.
2.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Inter-observer variation for clinical grading of Fuchs dystrophy (68 eyes). From: FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL DYSTROPHY: SUBJECTIVE GRADING VERSUS OBJECTIVE GRADING BASED ON THE CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL THICKNESS RATIO.

Agreement between two corneal specialists was only moderate (κ=0.32). The two observers agreed exactly for 30/68 eyes, and were within one grade for 57/68 eyes. Data are offset for clarity, and the number of observations is indicated.

Daniel J. Repp, et al. Ophthalmology. ;120(4):687-694.
3.
Figure 6

Figure 6. Receiver operating characteristic curves for Fuchs dystrophy versus normal. From: FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL DYSTROPHY: SUBJECTIVE GRADING VERSUS OBJECTIVE GRADING BASED ON THE CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL THICKNESS RATIO.

The central-to-peripheral thickness ratio at 4 mm (CPTR4) provided excellent discrimination between corneas with Fuchs dystrophy and normal corneas, whereas central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound (CCTus) provided only moderate discrimination. AUC, area under curve.

Daniel J. Repp, et al. Ophthalmology. ;120(4):687-694.
4.
Figure 3

Figure 3. Relationship between the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio at 4 mm (CPTR4) and age in normal corneas and corneas with Fuchs dystrophy. From: FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL DYSTROPHY: SUBJECTIVE GRADING VERSUS OBJECTIVE GRADING BASED ON THE CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL THICKNESS RATIO.

CPTR4 increased with age in normal corneas (r= 0.59, p<0.001, n=254) and corneas with mild and moderate Fuchs dystrophy (r= 0.48, p=.0008, n=42), but not in corneas with advanced Fuchs dystrophy (r= 0.14, p=0.26, n=65). After adjusting thickness ratios for age, CPTR4 was higher in advanced Fuchs dystrophy (1.03 ± 0.07, n=65) than in mild (0.96 ± 0.06, n=28, p<0.001) or moderate (0.94 ± 0.05, n=14, p<0.001), and higher in mild and moderate Fuchs dystrophy than normal (0.87 ± 0.05, n=254 p<0.001). Regression lines: gray, mild and moderate Fuchs dystrophy; dashed, normal.

Daniel J. Repp, et al. Ophthalmology. ;120(4):687-694.
5.
Figure 4

Figure 4. Relationship between the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio at 4 mm (CPTR4) and clinical grade of Fuchs dystrophy. From: FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL DYSTROPHY: SUBJECTIVE GRADING VERSUS OBJECTIVE GRADING BASED ON THE CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL THICKNESS RATIO.

CPTR4 was correlated with the grade of Fuchs dystrophy (r= 0.77, p<0.001, n=359); grade 0 represents corneas without Fuchs dystrophy. The regression line is a third-order polynomial indicating that there are two phases of central corneal edema; the first phase was at grades 1 to 4.5, and the second phase was at grades 5 to 6.

Daniel J. Repp, et al. Ophthalmology. ;120(4):687-694.
6.
Figure 2

Figure 2. Relationship between corneal thickness and age in normal corneas and corneas with Fuchs dystrophy. From: FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL DYSTROPHY: SUBJECTIVE GRADING VERSUS OBJECTIVE GRADING BASED ON THE CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL THICKNESS RATIO.

Left, In normal corneas, central corneal thickness (CCT) was not correlated with age (r=0.15, p=0.08, n=267), whereas peripheral corneal thickness at 4 mm from the center (PCT4) decreased with age (r= -0.33, p<0.001, n=254). Right, In corneas with Fuchs dystrophy, CCT was not correlated with age (r= -0.08, p=0.24, n=117), whereas PCT4 was correlated with age (r= -0.17, p=0.04, n=107) Although PCT4 was higher in Fuchs dystrophy (650 ± 51 μm) compared to normal corneas (643 ± 43 μm, p=0.002 after adjusting thickness for age), the difference was small and clinically insignificant. All data were measured with the scanning-slit pachymeter. Solid lines, regression lines for PCT4.

Daniel J. Repp, et al. Ophthalmology. ;120(4):687-694.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center