Predicted secondary structures of the CIRV wt and heterologous 3′CITEs used in this study. (A) Schematic representation of the CIRV genome. The thick horizontal line represents the RNA genome, with boxes depicting encoded proteins. Viral protein p36 and its readthrough product p95 are translated directly from the genome, as indicated by the dotted lines below. The start sites of two subgenomic RNAs produced during infection (sg1 and sg2) are shown by arrows below the genome. Sg1 is the template for p41 translation, while p22 and p19 are translated from sg2. The relevant RNA secondary structures in the 5′- and 3′UTRs are depicted schematically, with complementary adapter loops shown in white. The nucleotide sequences of the 5′- and 3′-adapter loops are shown adjacent to the UTRs with black characters in gray boxes, with complementary bases in white. (B) Mfold-predicted Y-shaped secondary structure of the wt CIRV 3′CITE. The 3′-adapter loop is shaded in gray, and bases that are complementary to the 5′ adapter are shown in white. The dashed boxes denote the nucleotide substitutions made in mutant Ym1. (C to E) Mfold-predicted secondary structures of the I-shaped-, PTE-, and BTE-class 3′CITEs that were engineered to replace the wt element in the CIRV genome. The virus that naturally contains each 3′CITE is specified alongside the predicted structure. In the PTE (D) and BTE (E), the wt adapter loops (shown in gray boxes) were replaced with the sequence indicated by the arrows to increase base-pairing potential with the CIRV 5′-adapter loop. (F) List of wt and hybrid CIRV genomes used in this study and the wt and heterologous 3′CITEs they contain.