U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 3

1.
Figure 3

Figure 3. Behavioral performance – controls and additional paradigms.. From: Audio-Visual Detection Benefits in the Rat.

Behavioral performance (% correct responses, upper panel) and reaction times (lower panel) as in (n = 4 animals each). Stars indicate statistical significance (ANOVA p<0.05). A) Paradigm with a softer auditory stimulus (65 dB). B) Paradigm with a non-informative sound, hence no auditory performance level. C) Paradigm using looming sounds instead of white noise.

Stephanie Gleiss, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45677.
2.
Figure 2

Figure 2. Behavioral performance – main paradigm.. From: Audio-Visual Detection Benefits in the Rat.

Behavioral performance (% correct responses, upper panel) and reaction times (lower panel) for each condition and as function of visual target intensity. Error-bars denote the mean and s.e.m. across animals (n = 8). Reaction times were normalized by subtracting each animals mean reaction time (computed across all conditions). Stars indicate statistical significance (ANOVA p<0.05). The data in A) were obtained after 10 days of training, those in B) after 25 days. Note that reaction times (e.g. for the visual condition) in B appear slower compared to A because of the normalization. Actual values for the visual conditions were comparable while those for the audio-visual conditions were shortened in B (c.f. data presented in the main text).

Stephanie Gleiss, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45677.
3.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Training setup and stimuli.. From: Audio-Visual Detection Benefits in the Rat.

A) Schematic of the training setup indicating three infra-red sensitive nose-pokes, a tube for reward-delivery and the lateralized visual and acoustic stimuli. Stimuli were presented on either side and in one of three modality conditions (visual only, auditory only, audio-visual). B) Sound wave (upper) and time-frequency representation (lower panel) for the auditory white-noise stimulus. Noise pulses lasted 60 ms with 80 ms inter-pulse intervals. C) Sound wave and time-frequency representation for auditory looming sounds. Individual looming sweeps lasted 500 ms and were separated by 100 ms intervals. D) Schematic of trial timing. Trial initialization by the animal was followed by a pre-stimulus period (300–500 ms) subsequent to which the stimulus appeared on either side. The first 200 ms of stimulus presentation were defined as no-response epoch during which responses were ‘punished’ by time-outs. E) Behavioral performance (% correct responses) for the first days during the final training stage (Step 6). The animals reached stable performance above 80% in few days of training on this step. Days are indicated relative to the total training time (including all steps).

Stephanie Gleiss, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45677.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center