U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 4

1.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Host gene response to endosymbiont and pathogen in the cereal weevil Sitophilus oryzae.

Sequence treatment (A) and functional annotation procedure (B).

Aurélien Vigneron, et al. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12(Suppl 1):S14-S14.
2.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Host gene response to endosymbiont and pathogen in the cereal weevil Sitophilus oryzae.

General description of libraries. (A) Table of ESTs and Unigene numbers presented for each library. The percentages of mitochondrial and rRNA sequences are also provided. (B) Distribution of unigenes (UGs) as a function of the number of ESTs involved in the UG sequences. UGs with only one EST are singletons, UGs with more than one EST are contigs. (C) Blast2go annotation results. Number of sequences presenting GO terms association is given for each step of the functional annotation. The different steps are described in the Methods section.

Aurélien Vigneron, et al. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12(Suppl 1):S14-S14.
3.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Host gene response to endosymbiont and pathogen in the cereal weevil Sitophilus oryzae.

Analysis of gene expression profiles in the bacteriome. Transcripts of genes were quantified by qRT-PCR. Bacteriomes dissected from fourth-instar larvae were compared to whole aposymbiotic fourth-instar larvae. Expression of genes was normalized with the expression of the ribosomal protein L29. Each box represents the median (bolt line) and the quartiles (25% / 75%) of five independent measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the REST pair-wise fixed reallocation randomization test. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the bacteriome and the control (p-value < 0.05).

Aurélien Vigneron, et al. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12(Suppl 1):S14-S14.
4.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Host gene response to endosymbiont and pathogen in the cereal weevil Sitophilus oryzae.

Quantitative immune gene expression in symbiotic and aposymbiotic larvae of Sitophilus oryzae. (A) Transcript levels of immune genes quantified by qRT-PCR in whole aposymbiotic and symbiotic larvae. For both symbiotic and aposymbiotic larvae, non-injected larvae, larvae injected with PBS, and larvae injected with E. coli were analyzed. Results from gene expression in the bacteriome are reported here as an indicator. Represented expression of genes was normalized with the expression of the ribosomal protein L29. Each box represents the median (bolt line) and quartiles (25% / 75%) of five independent measurements. For each symbiotic and aposymbiotic status, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was applied in order to determine global difference between the three modalities tested (p-value < 0.05), represented by an asterisk. (B) Differential expression ratios obtained from q-RT-PCR experiments. For genes presenting significant differences in expression after the global test (see A), the pricking stress effect was tested by comparing larvae injected, or not, with PBS. The infection effect was tested by comparing larvae injected with PBS and larvae injected with E. coli. The REST pair-wise fixed reallocation randomization test was applied. For each modality tested (not injected, injected with PBS and injected with E. coli), a comparison between symbiotic larvae and aposymbiotic larvae was applied in order to evaluate the impact of symbiosis on the expression of immune genes. The REST pair-wise fixed reallocation randomization test was performed between the expression of genes from symbiotic and aposymbiotic larvae. Underlined scores indicate significant differences between the two modalities tested (p-value < 0.05). An up-arrow indicates upregulated genes whereas a down-arrow indicates downregulated genes.

Aurélien Vigneron, et al. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12(Suppl 1):S14-S14.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center