Plots of average spatial heterozygosity as a function of angle during range expansions from well-mixed 1 : 1 populations in our model (A), on-lattice simulations (B), off-lattice simulations (C), and experiments (D). A, Solution of with Ds = 1, Dg = 1, v‖ = 1, and R0 = 1 at various times t. Note that there is no significant difference between H(500, ϕ) and H(1000, ϕ) because H(t, ϕ) reaches a nontrivial limit shape as t → ∞. B, H(t, ϕ) from 24 on-lattice simulations with the same parameters as in , except that N = 300. In agreement with A, we see a gradual decrease of H(t, 0) with time. The radius r = v‖t + R0 is in direct correspondence with time t. C, H(t, ϕ) at the expansion frontier from 10 off-lattice simulations, as in . Because off-lattice simulations model a monolayer of cells, any spatial point in a colony has a unique genetic state; hence, H(t, 0) = 0. D, Average spatial heterozygosity calculated from eight Escherichia coli colonies inoculated with 3 µL of the bacterial mix of cells. As in B, radius r is directly related to time t because the spatiogenetic pattern is a frozen record of the genetic composition of the front. The dip in H(t, ϕ) widens with time, in agreement with . Similar to C, H(t, 0) = 0 because we assume that f(t, ϕ) is either 0 or 1 at every pixel. This assumption is valid only after the initial fixation time, as discussed in the text.