U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 4

1.
Figure 4.

Figure 4. From: In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements.

Schematic representation of a biochemical pathway under the control of the rpoS gene: arginine degradation to succinate via putrescine (adapted from EcoCyc; http://ecocyc.org/). Genes belonging to this pathway and found to be preferentially transcribed by EσS in ROMA experiments are boxed with solid lines (speB, puuB and gabD); genes co-transcribed with either puuB or gabD (i.e. belonging to the puuCBE and gabDTP operons; see also Supplementary Table 1) are boxed with dashed lines. Other genes of the pathway known to be dependent on the rpoS gene in vivo (puuA and puuD) (,) are underlined.

Anna Maciąg, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(13):5338-5355.
2.
Figure 1.

Figure 1. From: In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements.

In vitro transcription experiments on supercoiled plasmids. Transcription from the ilvY, speB, xapA, ydhY and ssrS P1 promoter regions cloned into pJCD01 plasmid was performed in the presence of either EσS or Eσ70; transcript amounts were determined by quantitative real-time PCR as described in ‘Materials and Methods’ section, using the RNA-I transcript as reference as previously described (). Relative transcript levels are shown as EσS/Eσ70 ratio. Experiments were performed three times in duplicate, and standard errors are shown.

Anna Maciąg, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(13):5338-5355.
3.
Figure 3.

Figure 3. From: In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements.

In vitro transcription experiments on pJCD01 plasmid derivatives in which either the ssrS P1 promoter (ssrS P1 WT) or a mutated derivative (ssrS P1 mut) had been cloned. The ssrS P1 mut carries a double substitution (CG to TA) at positions −3/−2 (shown in the figure). In vitro transcription was performed in the presence of either EσS or Eσ70; transcript amounts were determined by quantitative real-time PCR as described in ‘Materials and Methods’ section, using the RNA-I transcript as reference as previously described (). Experiments were performed three times in duplicate, and standard errors are shown.

Anna Maciąg, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(13):5338-5355.
4.
Figure 2.

Figure 2. From: In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements.

Conserved sequence features in promoters of genes showing preferential transcription by either Eσ70 or EσS, shown as a sequence logo derived from multiple sequence alignments. (A) Comparison of alignments in the −60 to −18 promoter regions. (B) Comparison of alignments in the −17 to +2 promoter regions. Note that different y-axis scales were used in the two panels to account for the different levels of sequence conservation. Multiple alignment included 31 promoters controlling genes preferentially transcribed by EσS in ROMA experiments (listed in Supplementary File S1) and 29 promoters preferentially recognized by Eσ70 (listed in Supplementary File S2).

Anna Maciąg, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(13):5338-5355.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center