U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 6

1.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Effect of (A) 10 μM norepinephrine or (B) 10 μM epinephrine on anoikis in ovarian cancer cells. . From: Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis.

Gray bars, vehicle treatment; black bars, norepinephrine (A) or epinephrine (B) treatment. Results represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

Anil K. Sood, et al. J Clin Invest. 2010 May 3;120(5):1515-1523.
2.
Figure 2

Figure 2. Effect of catecholamines on FAK activation.. From: Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis.

(A) SKOV3ip1 or EG cells were plated and treated with either norepinephrine (NE) or epinephrine (Epi) and then subjected to Western blot analysis for FAK or pFAKY397. (B) SKOV3ip1 cells kept in suspension were treated with norepinephrine, followed by Western blot for FAK and pFAKY397. (C) SKOV3ip1 cells were treated with norepinephrine, then subjected to immunofluorescence analysis for pFAKY397 and actin. Quantification of pFAKY397 staining is shown in the graph. Scale bars: 10 μm. (D) Effect of 10 μM norepinephrine with or without FAK silencing with siRNA on anoikis. Results represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.01.

Anil K. Sood, et al. J Clin Invest. 2010 May 3;120(5):1515-1523.
3.
Figure 5

Figure 5. Effect of (A) chronic stress or (B) isoproterenol on tumor cell apoptosis in ascites as a reflection of in vivo anoikis using the 2774 model. . From: Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis.

Effects of control siRNA-DOPC or FAK siRNA-DOPC on stress-induced in vivo (C) SKOV3ip1 or (D) HeyA8 tumor growth. (E) Effect of stress on tumor cell apoptosis in the SKOV3ip1 model. (F) Effect of propranolol or FAK siRNA-DOPC on tumor cell apoptosis in ascites as a measure of anoikis using the 2774 model. Results represent the mean ± SEM; n = 10 mice per group. *P < 0.01.

Anil K. Sood, et al. J Clin Invest. 2010 May 3;120(5):1515-1523.
4.
Figure 3

Figure 3. Effect of propranolol (nonspecific β-antagonist), atenolol (β1 antagonist), butoxamine (β2 antagonist), or SR59230A (β3-antagonist) on FAK and pFAKY397 in (A) SKOV3ip1 and (B) EG cells. . From: Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis.

(C) Effect of 10 μM norepinephrine with or without propranolol or ADRB1- or ADRB2-targeted (β1 or β2) siRNA in SKOV3ip1 cells on anoikis. (D) Effect of β1 and β2 targeted siRNA on pFAKY397 and FAK in SKOV3ip1 cells. In A, B, and D, the immunoblot is shown at the top, and quantification of band intensity relative to total FAK intensity is shown below. For all panels, results represent the mean ± SEM of triplicate experiments. *P < 0.01.

Anil K. Sood, et al. J Clin Invest. 2010 May 3;120(5):1515-1523.
5.
Figure 4

Figure 4. Mechanism of norepinephrine-mediated (NE-mediated) FAK activation.. From: Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis.

(A) SKOV3ip1 cells stimulated with 10 μM norepinephrine were treated with either the Src inhibitor PP2 or its inactive counterpart PP3 followed by immunoblotting for FAK and pFAKY397. In addition, the effect of Src silencing with siRNA was examined on norepinephrine-mediated FAK activation. (B) SYF-null cells transfected with either empty vector (EV) or Src (WT Src) were stimulated with 10 μM norepinephrine, followed by immunoblotting for FAK and pFAKY397. (C) SKOV3ip1 cells treated with 10 μM norepinephrine were subjected to immunoprecipitation for Src (left) or FAK (right), followed by immunoblotting for FAK and Src. (D) Cells stimulated with 10 μM norepinephrine were treated with thapsigargin followed by Western blot for pFAKY397 and FAK (left). Cells stimulated with 10 μM norepinephrine were treated with EGTA followed by immunoprecipitation for FAK, then immunoblotting for FAK and Src (right). (E) SKOV3ip1 cells stimulated with 10 μM norepinephrine were treated with cytochalasin D (Cyt D), followed by Western blot for pFAKY397 and FAK. In A, D, and E, the immunoblot is shown at the top, and quantification of band intensity relative to total FAK intensity is shown below.

Anil K. Sood, et al. J Clin Invest. 2010 May 3;120(5):1515-1523.
6.
Figure 6

Figure 6. Clinical significance of FAK activation in ovarian carcinoma.. From: Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis.

(A) Representative images of human ovarian tumors with low or high immunohistochemical staining for FAK and pFAKY397. Original magnification, ×200. (B) Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-specific mortality for patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma based on FAK or pFAKY397 expression. The log-rank test (2-sided) was used to compare differences between groups. Percentage of ovarian cancers with high FAK or pFAKY397 expression based on CESD scores of at least 16 (C) or tumoral norepinephrine (NE) levels (greater versus less than median value of 0.84 pg/mg) (D).

Anil K. Sood, et al. J Clin Invest. 2010 May 3;120(5):1515-1523.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center