U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 6

1.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize.

Fecundity (mx) for D. magna fed GM-maize (dashed lines) and UM-maize (solid lines), without predator (n = 60), with predator (n = 20) and all samples combined (n = 80)

Thomas Bøhn, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19(2):419-430.
2.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize.

Survival (lx) for D. magna fed GM-maize (dashed lines) and UM-maize (solid lines), without predator (n = 60), with predator (n = 20) and all samples combined (n = 80)

Thomas Bøhn, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19(2):419-430.
3.
Fig. 6

Fig. 6. From: Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize.

(Top): effects of predator treatment (dashed line = predator, solid line = no predator) on (st)age-specific fecundity (left) and the contributions of those effects on population growth rate (right). (Bottom): effects of predator on (st)age-specific survival (left) and the contributions of those effects on population growth rate (right)

Thomas Bøhn, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19(2):419-430.
4.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. From: Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize.

Mean body size (whiskers, 95% CI) of D. magna fed on GM-maize (open squares) and UM-maize (filled circles) at days 17, 29 and 42. The p-values of significant differences are shown (t-test)

Thomas Bøhn, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19(2):419-430.
5.
Fig. 4

Fig. 4. From: Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize.

Population growth rate per month (lambda—whiskers, 95% bootstrap CI) for D. magna fed unmodified (UM) and modified (GM) maize, without predator (n = 60), with predator (n = 20) and for all samples combined (n = 80)

Thomas Bøhn, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19(2):419-430.
6.
Fig. 5

Fig. 5. From: Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize.

(Top): decomposition of food treatment (dashed line = GM, solid line = UM) effects on the (st)age-specific fecundity for the total material (n = 80). Left panel shows absolute effects (relative to the mean) and right panel shows the contributions of those effects on the population growth rate. (Bottom): decomposition of food treatment effects on the (st)age-specific survival. Left panel shows absolute effects (relative to the mean) and right panel shows the contributions of those effects on the population growth rate

Thomas Bøhn, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19(2):419-430.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center