U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 7

1.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

Grey matter and vCSF templates used for spatial correlation with the thresholded Z-map of the independent component.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.
2.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

Flowchart of the optimal features/components selection, explaining how to identify the final optimal components from the raw data.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.
3.
Fig. 7

Fig. 7. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

The extracted joint component with the largest J-divergence from feature combination of [SM,SM,SBP,AODT]. The activations of the 3 features are transferred to Z score and thresholded at ∣Z∣>2.5.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.
4.
Fig. 5

Fig. 5. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

Top 14 ICs with a J-divergence larger than 1.5 among all extracted ICs of 15 combinations. Their feature combination names are displayed on the bar. Component’s number of the top 3 ICs is also shown in bracket.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.
5.
Fig. 4

Fig. 4. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

J-divergence of the optimal components selected by 2 criteria: the smallest p value (blue bar) and the largest J-divergence (green bar), for 15 feature combinations. The modulus of the above two J-divergence values are plotted as red bar, which is treated as the group discriminating power of each feature combination.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.
6.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

The most remarkable characteristics for 8 components decomposed from an fMRI dataset with a single Sternberg_probe task. Note that the 3rd IC is sparsely-distributed noise, the 5th IC is a vCSF artifact, the 7th IC manifests as movement-related artifact; and others appear to be ICs of interest. The descriptive measures used to classify the components are listed below in a table. All the 3 artifacts show zero (green background) in either of the criteria listed in the first two rows.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.
7.
Fig. 6

Fig. 6. From: An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques.

(a), (b) are the spatial maps of the top 3 optimal components, which are converted to Z-scores and thresholded at ∣Z∣>2.5; (c) shows the overlapping regions of the 4 features with their original spatial map values, these activated regions are important for group discrimination and may serve as biomarkers of schizophrenia patients; (d) displays the difference between the back-reconstructed sources (HC-SZ) on the combined highlighted regions of the top three optimal ICs in (c), the regions where HC>SZ in ∣Z∣ score are shown in orange, otherwise are shown in blue.

Jing Sui, et al. Neuroimage. ;46(1):73-86.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center