U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 7

1.
Figure 6

Figure 6. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

The chemical structures of JA-Ile and coronatine are similar.

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.
2.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

Tomato leaves 5 days after dip-inoculation with 1×107 CFU/ml suspension of the wild-type bacterium Pst DC3000 (left) and the coronatine-defective mutant Pst DC3118 (right). Whereas Pst DC3000 caused necrotic lesions with diffuse chlorosis, the coronatine-defective mutant bacteria caused only some lesions and no chlorosis.

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.
3.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

Pst DC3000 populations 8 h after transferring 1.2×106 CFU/ml bacteria in water, Luria-Bertani broth (LB), intercellular wash fluid (IWF), and hrp-inducing minimal medium (MM). Data points are means and standard deviations of three replicate cultures.

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.
4.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

A simplified diagram of the infection cycle of Pseudomonas syringae. (a) A diagram of healthy plant leaves. (b) Bacterial cells on a leaf surface, illustrating aggregation of some bacteria near a trichome. (c) Bacteria penetrating open stomate. (d) Cross section of a leaf showing bacteria colonizing the plant apoplast. (e) Extensive multiplication of bacteria in the apoplast of a leaf. (f) Visible disease-associated necrosis and chlorosis.

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.
5.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

(a) Light-conditioned leaf epidermis (top pictures) showing mostly open stomata and the same leaf epidermis after 1 h exposure to purified PAMP or live bacteria (bottom pictures). Note that most stomatal pores are closed after exposure to bacteria or PAMPs. (b) Stomatal response in light-exposed epidermal peels of Arabidopsis leaves exposed to water, DC3000, or DB29. DB29 is a coronatine-biosynthesis-defective (cor) mutant (). Stomatal response to this cor mutant is similar to response to DC3118, another cor mutant (, ).

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.
6.
Figure 7

Figure 7. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

A model of COR action in the plant cell (possibly all cell types). COR (structure shown) is secreted by Pst DC3000 into the plant cell and increases the affinity of the COI1 protein (as part of the SCFCOI1-ubiquitin ligase complex; not shown here) toward JAZ repressor and possibly other host proteins (denoted by “X”). The SCFCOI1 complex catalyzes ubiquitination of JAZ and other host proteins, which are then degraded through the 26S proteasome (denoted as “26S”). JAZ proteins normally function as repressors by physically binding to transcriptional activators (such as MYC2) of jasmonate response genes. In the stomatal guard cell, PAMPs (e.g., flagellin and LPS) are perceived by cognate immune receptors (e.g., flagellin receptor FLS2). Perception of PAMPs triggers stomatal closure, which requires SA, ABA, and OST1 kinase. COR-mediated inhibition of PAMP-triggered stomatal closure and other innate immune responses could be mediated by JAZ and/or “X” proteins.

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.
7.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Role of Stomata in Plant Innate Immunity and Foliar Bacterial Diseases.

A diagram depicting stomata as entry sites for bacterial invasion. (a) A cross-sectional view of leaf epidermis and mesophyll cells showing that stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells (GC), in light-adapted Arabidopsis leaves are mostly fully open. (b) Upon exposure to bacteria, guard cells perceive PAMPs and many stomata close within 1 h. Because not all stomata are closed, those ‘non-responsive’ open stomata (e.g., stomate on the left) may provide a route for bacterial entry at a basal level. Dashed arrows indicate diffusion of PAMPs on the epidermal surface or in the intercellular space (apoplast) between mesophyll cells, which can also perceive PAMPs and activate additional host defenses. (c) In the case of the virulent plant pathogen Pst DC3000, 3 h after infection bacteria produce diffusible COR in the apoplast and/or on the plant surface to re-open closed stomata (e.g., middle stomate), thereby increasing the number of sites for bacterial invasion. Pst DC3000 bacteria also inject TTSS effectors into mesophyll cells to suppress host defenses and to release nutrients. COR and TTSS effectors have overlapping functions in the suppression of host defenses in the apoplast and in the promotion of disease symptoms (see text). COR also induces disease susceptibility systemically in leaves (; see text). This figure is adapted from Underwood et al. () with permission of the Publisher.

Maeli Melotto, et al. Annu Rev Phytopathol. ;46:101-122.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center