Adoptive transfer of WT but not CCR4−/− -derived iNKT cells induced the development of AHR in OVA-sensitized and challenged mice. Statistical analysis is shown as the results of the pairwise Student t test between experimental and negative control groups with p ≤ 0.05 (*) and p ≤ 0.01 (**). a, CCR4−/− mice failed to develop significant OVA-induced AHR. AHR was assessed in OVA-sensitized and -challenged mice (sensitized with alum or Aspergillus Ag (alum sensitized shown)). Data are Penh values (mean ± SEM) of at least four mice per group, representative of three experiments for OVA-sensitized groups (shown) and two for Aspergillus-sensitized groups. b, Airway eosinophilia was reduced in OVA-sensitized and -challenged CCR4−/− vs WT mice. BAL fluid from mice in a was taken 2 days after the final OVA i.n. challenge. Representative results are shown as the mean ± SEM number of cells per milliliter of BAL fluid. TCC, Total cell count; MO, monocytes; EOS, eosinophils; LYM, lymphocytes; NEU, neutrophils. c, IL-4 production by OVA-restimulated bronchial lymph node cells was measured in CCR4−/− and WT mice after sensitization and challenge with OVA (see Materials and Methods). d, Adoptive transfer of iNKT cells from WT but not CCR4−/− mice boosted AHR in CCR4−/− mice. Splenic iNKT cells were sorted from CCR4−/− or WT mice (1.5 × 106 cells/recipient) and transferred into OVA/alum-sensitized CCR4−/− mice 1 day before consecutive i.n. challenges with OVA. AHR was assessed by changes in airway resistance (RL) and dynamic compliance (Cdyne) in response to methacholine in anesthetized, tracheostomized, intubated, and mechanically ventilated mice. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three to four mice per group from three experiments. e, iNKT cell numbers in the BAL fluid of CCR4−/− mice sensitized and challenged with OVA were significantly reduced compared with those of WT mice. BAL fluid collected from each mouse in c was evaluated for iNKT cells using anti- TCRβ mAb and unloaded CD1d tetramer (negative control; leftmost panel) or α-GalCer -loaded CD1d tetramer from WT (second panel) vs CCR4−/− mice that were recipients to either CCR4−/− iNKT (third panel) or WT iNKT cells (rightmost panel), with percentage of lymphocytes indicated above the iNKT cell gate. f, Adoptive transfer of WT but not CCR4−/− increased the absolute number of iNKT cells in the BAL fluid of CCR4−/− mice sensitized and challenged with OVA. Flow cytometric analysis of mice similarly treated as in d were used to calculate the absolute number of iNKT cells in the BAL fluid (see Materials and Methods). g, Adoptive transfer of iNKT cells from WT but not CCR4−/− mice reconstituted AHR in Jα18−/− mice. iNKT cells were sorted from the spleens of CCR4−/− or WT mice (1 × 106 cells/recipient) and transferred into OVA/alum-sensitized Jα18−/− mice 1 day before consecutive i.n. challenges with OVA. AHR was assessed by changes in airway resistance (RL) and dynamic compliance (Cdyne, as in 6 days). Data are representative of the mean ± SEM of three to five mice per group from two experiments. h, Adoptively transferred iNKT cells from WT but not CCR4−/− mice localized into the BAL fluid of Jα18−/− mice after transfer. BAL fluid cells from individual mice treated as in a were collected 1 day after measurement of AHR and were stained with anti-TCRβ mAb and α-GalCer -loaded CD1d tetramer. One representative experiment of three is shown and data are the mean ± SD of calculated individual BAL iNKT cell numbers.