U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 2

1.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: The evolution of a conjugative plasmid and its ability to increase bacterial fitness.

Relative fitness of E. coli cells with the fitness of E(−) normalized to one. The plasmid R1′ is the evolved R11′ plasmid of , hence the values are those of . E′ stands for evolved E. coli cells. Other symbols as explained in . Fitness values (±twofold the standard error) are relative to E(−). The relative fitness values of E(R1), E′(R1′), E′(−) and E′(R1) are, respectively, 0.683±0.042 (n=3), 1.136±0.196 (n=3), 1.083±0.025 (n=3) and 1.028±0.098 (n=3) for white bars and 0.360±0.093 (n=3), 1.192±0.042 (n=3), 0.982±0.018 (n=3) and 1.092±0.054 (n=3) for grey bars.

F Dionisio, et al. Biol Lett. 2005 Jun 22;1(2):250-252.
2.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: The evolution of a conjugative plasmid and its ability to increase bacterial fitness.

Relative fitness of E. coli bearing evolved R1 plasmids, R11′ to R15′ from five independent experiments with the fitness of E(−) normalized to one. E(R1) and E(−) stand for E. coli K12 cells bearing and not bearing the R1 plasmid, respectively. White bars show relative fitness measured by competition against E. coli srl∷Tn10, StrR (R1); grey bars show competition against E. coli K12 Δara, ValR (R1). Fitness values (±twofold the standard error, both throughout the text and in error bars) are relative to E(−), which is 1±0.077 for the white bar (n=15, n being the number of experiments) and 1.000±0.033 for the grey bar (n=15). Relative fitnesses of E(R11′)–E(R15′) are, respectively, 1.726±0.192 (n=15), 1.026±0.074 (n=3), 1.101±0.072 (n=3), 1.162±0.021 (n=3) and 0.951±0.067 (n=3) for white bars and 2.051±0.087 (n=12), 1.013±0.071 (n=3), 1.088±0.050 (n=3), 1.128±0.042 (n=3) and 1.092±0.053 (n=3) for grey bars. Significance levels over the bars (two-tailed t-test assuming unequal variances: *if p<0.05, **if p<0.01 and ***if p<0.001) refer to significant differences of fitness relative to E(−)).

F Dionisio, et al. Biol Lett. 2005 Jun 22;1(2):250-252.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center