Peer-Review Transparency[Federal Practitioner. 2019]
Paul RA. Federal Practitioner. 2019 Mar; 36(3): 106-107
Independent Scientific Review under the Endangered Species Act[Bioscience. 2019]
Murphy DD, Weiland PS. Bioscience. 2019 Feb 13; 69(3): 198-208
The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications[Scientometrics. 2018]
Horbach SP, Halffman W. Scientometrics. 2018 Nov 29; 118(1): 339-373
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review[BMC Medical Research Methodolo...]
Superchi C, González JA, Solà I, Cobo E, Hren D, Boutron I. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019 Mar 6; 19: 48
On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective[PLoS Biology. 2019]
Sarabipour S, Debat HJ, Emmott E, Burgess SJ, Schwessinger B, Hensel Z. PLoS Biology. 2019 Feb 21; 17(2): e3000151

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006 Apr; 99(4)178

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Review Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review.[JAMA. 2002]

Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F

JAMA. 2002 Jun 5; 287(21):2784-6.

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review.[Nature. 1997]

Wenneras C, Wold A

Nature. 1997 May 22; 387(6631):341-3.

The critical attitude in medicine: the need for a new ethics.[Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983]

McIntyre N, Popper K

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Dec 24-31; 287(6409):1919-23.

Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews.[Lancet. 1997]

Horton R

Lancet. 1997 Jan 4; 349(9044):6.

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.[JAMA. 1990]

McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9; 263(10):1371-6.

Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.[JAMA. 1998]

Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, Berlin JA, Rennie D

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15; 280(3):240-2.
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial.[JAMA. 1998]

van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Smith R, Black N

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15; 280(3):234-7.

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.[BMJ. 2004]

Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R

BMJ. 2004 Mar 20; 328(7441):673.

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.[BMJ. 2004]

Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R

BMJ. 2004 Mar 20; 328(7441):673.