Guillain-Barre syndrome in 220 patients with COVID-19

Abstract

Introduction

Since the outbreak of the pandemic by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, it became rapidly obvious that the virus not only causes lung disease (COVID-19) but affects other organs as well, particularly the central and peripheral nervous system (PNS, CNS), the kidneys, the intestines, and the heart [1–3]. The most disabling PNS disorder is polyradiculitis (polyradiculoneuritis, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS)) [4]. GBS comprises a number of subtypes which include acute, inflammatory, demyelinating neuropathy (AIDP) (classic type), acute, motor, axonal neuropathy (AMAN), acute, motor and sensory, axonal neuropathy (AMSAN), Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS), polyneuritis cranialis (PNC), the pharyngeal, cervical, and brachial (PCB) variant, and Bickerstaff encephalitis (BFE) [5]. GBS is usually diagnosed according to the Brighton criteria if there is bilateral, progressive, flaccid lower > upper limb paraparesis, if tendon reflexes in weak limbs are diminished, if the disease course is monophasic and if time between onset and nadir ranges from 12 h to 28 days, if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) investigations reveal a cell count < 50cells/μL, if CSF protein is elevated (dissociation cyto-albuminque (DCA)), and if nerve conduction studies show a demyelinating lesion of motor nerves (AIDP), an axonal lesion of motor nerves (AMAN), or an axonal lesion of motor and sensory nerves (AMSAN) [5]. MFS is diagnosed if there is acute onset ophthalmoplegia, areflexia, ataxia, and DCA. PNC is diagnosed in case of a lesion of a single or multiple cranial nerves and DCA. PCB is diagnosed if there is progressive dysphagia, dysphonia, upper limb weakness, and DCA [5]. BFE is diagnosed if there are pyramidal signs and impaired consciousness in addition to MFS. In the early stages of GBS, upper or lower limb paraplegia with preserved tendon reflexes may occur [5]. There can be even hyperreflexia if the pyramidal tract is involved. All GBS subtypes occur in the setting of a preceding viral or bacterial infection. The type of preceding infection largely determines the subtype and clinical course of GBS. This systematised review summarises and discusses recent findings and future perspectives concerning the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of SARS-CoV-2-associated GBS (SC2-GBS).

Methods

A systematised literature search in the databases PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms “neuropathy,” “Guillain Barre syndrome,” “polyradiculitis,” “AIDP,” “AMAN,” “AMSAN,” “Miller-Fisher syndrome,” “polyneuritis cranialis,” and “Bickerstaff encephlaitis,” in combination with “SARS-CoV-2,” “COVID-19,” and “coronavirus” was conducted. Additionally, reference lists were checked for further articles meeting the search criteria. Included were only original articles detailing individual patients’ data (age, sex, latency between onset of COVID-19 and SC2-GBS, GBS subtype, results of CSF investigations, treatment, and outcome) and written in English, French, Spanish, Italian, or German, Excluded from data analysis were reviews, abstracts, proceedings, and editorials as well as original studies not specifying individual patients’ data (Fig. ​(Fig.11).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 1

Flow chart detailing the search protocol and the results after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria

Main text

By the end of December 2020, at least 220 patients with SC2-GBS have been published in 95 papers (Tables ​(Tables11 and ​and2).2). Age of these patients (reported in n = 215) ranged from 8–94 years (Table ​(Table1).1). Gender (reported in n = 213) was male in 146 and female in 67 (Tables ​(Tables11 and ​and2).2). Onset (reported in n = 165) was identified after/together with/before onset of non-neurological COVID-19 manifestations in 156/3/6 patients (Tables ​(Tables11 and ​and2).2). Latency between onset of COVID-19 and GBS (n = 194) ranged from − 10 to 90 days. One patient remained asymptomatic. The GBS subtype (reported in n = 152) was identified as AIDP (n = 118), AMAN (n = 13), AMSAN (n = 11), MFS (n = 7), PNC (n = 2), the PCB variant (n = 1), and BFE (n = 0). SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the CSF in any of the patients (Table ​(Table1).1). Therapy of GBS (reported in n = 215) comprised intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) (n = 191), plasmapheresis (n = 15), steroids (n = 2), or no therapy (n = 7) (Tables ​(Tables11 and ​and2).2). Forty-one patients required artificial ventilation (Tables ​(Tables11 and ​and2).2). Outcome (reported in n = 168) was assessed as complete recovery (n = 37), partial recovery (n = 119), or death (n = 12) (Tables ​(Tables11 and ​and2).2). No studies about factors determining the outcome of SC2-GBS subtypes were identified.

Discussion

This systematic review shows that SC2-GBS is not due to a direct attack of the virus but rather due to an immunological reaction to the virus. It also shows that the number of reports about SC2-GBS is increasing and that the outcome is worse compared to non-SC2-GBS [6].

Though the number of cases with SC2-GBS is increasing suggesting that the overall prevalence of GBS has increased since the outbreak of the pandemic, there are conflicting results concerning this matter. In a UK study of 47 SC2-GBS patients, the prevalence of GBS did not increase between March 2020 and May 2020 as compared to the years 2016–2019 [6]. On the contrary, a retrospective, multi-centre study from northern Italy of 34 SC2-GBS patients showed that the estimated incidence of GBS in March 2020 and April 2020 increased from 0.93/100000/year in 2019 to 2.43/100000/year in 2020 [7]. There are several reasons why SC2-GBS may be missed and why the prevalence of GBS in fact increased since onset of the pandemic. First, SC2-GBS may go undetected due to misinterpretation as increased weakness or sensory disturbances of a pre-existing neuropathy. Second, SC2-GBS may be misinterpreted as critical ill neuropathy. Third, work-up for neuropathy may be incomplete due to mild manifestations or due to occurrence during ICU stay.

Before diagnosing SC2-GBS, it is crucial to exclude various differential diagnoses. These include previously existing neuropathy, critical ill myopathy, critical ill neuropathy, toxic neuropathy, or neuropathy or myopathy due to side effects of applied drugs. Lopinavir and tocilizumab have been reported to cause neuropathy [8, 9]. There are also reports indicating that chloroquine may induce neuropathy [10].

If GBS develops during immobilisation for artificial ventilation, diagnosing SC2-GBS becomes challenging [7]. In patients under artificial ventilation for COVID-19, SC2-GBS should be considered if clinical neurologic exam suggests neuropathy and if patients cannot be weaned from the respirator. In this case, nerve conduction studies and investigations of the CSF should be initiated. Diagnosing SC2-GBS is crucial as appropriate treatment may improve the overall outcome of COVID-19 patients [11].

In some cases, SC2-GBS develops before classical clinical manifestations of the infection [12] being explained by subclinical infection with the virus prior to onset of GBS or the incubation time of SARS-CoV-2, which is up to 14 days [7].

Though there are no prediction models for the outcome or the need of artificial ventilation in SC2-GBS patients available, there are indications that the outcome is poor if there are complications from hypercoagulability (stroke, pulmonary embolism) and if there are superinfections or sepsis.

Most of the studies included in this review did not specify if respiratory failure in SC2-GBS patients resulted from brainstem encephalitis, BFE, involvement of the respiratory muscles in GBS, from pneumonia ending up as acute, respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), from pulmonary embolism, heart failure, or from mixtures of these conditions. Specifying the cause of respiratory failure however is crucial as treatment and outcome may differ significantly among these conditions.

Conclusions

SC2-GBS is most likely secondary to an immune reaction against SARS-CoV-2 since the virus has not been found in CSF of any SC2-GBS patient reported. SC2-GBS occurs at any age. SC2-GBS does not differ from non-SC2-GBS regarding clinical presentation and treatment, but the outcome of SC2-GBS is worse compared to non-CS2-GBS patients. The prevalence/incidence of GBS most likely increased since the outbreak of the pandemic. Since there are no studies about the optimal treatment of SC2-GBS subtypes available, they should be treated empirically in the same way as non-SC2-GBS subtypes. Early diagnosis of SC2-GBS is warranted because if appropriate treatment is applied in due time, the overall outcome from the infection may improve.

Acknowledgements

Abbreviations

Authors’ contributions

JF: design, literature search, discussion, first draft, critical comments, FS: literature search, discussion, critical comments, final approval.

All authors have read and approved the manuscript and ensured that this is the case.

Funding

None received

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Declarations

Footnotes

References