Enabling liver transplantation during the COVID-19 era: More than screening donors and recipients for SARS-CoV-2

The consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the early postoperative course after liver transplantation (LT) are still not fully known. While data is scarce, it indicates that the incidence of early post-transplant coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) may reach up to 38% (). Some centers have developed strategies for performing LT during the pandemic and, after implementing a multimodal stepwise approach, these facilities could minimize the risk of recipient SARS-CoV-2 infection (,). These measures may be summarized as [...]

The consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the early postoperative course after liver transplantation (LT) are still not fully known. While data is scarce, it indicates that the incidence of early post-transplant coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) may reach up to 38% (1). Some centers have developed strategies for performing LT during the pandemic and, after implementing a multimodal stepwise approach, these facilities could minimize the risk of recipient SARS-CoV-2 infection (2,3). These measures may be summarized as establishing physically separated hospital facilities and in-hospital barrier protocols, performing rapid donor and recipient screening for SARS-CoV-2 once the organ becomes available, and optimizing recipient selection (2,3). We would like to share our experience, in which we initially observed a high post-LT COVID-19 infection rate in the first month of the pandemic, however we were able to reduce it significantly by adopting a similar approach, most notably by intensifying and expanding our barrier protocols.
Our institution, the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (HCFMUSP), is a medical complex located in São Paulo, Brazil, a city severely affected by SARS-CoV-2, with 160,337 confirmed cases documented by 1 July 2020. It is a public quaternary hospital and a major transplant center in Latin America, and it became the main referral center for severe COVID-19 cases when a city-wide quarantine was declared on March 24 th . To maintain LT activity, a building specifically dedicated to non-COVID-19 patients was established. Second, we developed rapid screening protocols for donors and recipients, including epidemiological and clinical evaluation, real-time polymerase chain-reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 from respiratory secretions, and chest computed tomography scans. Third, we tried to avoid using expanded-criteria donors and aimed to transplant more critical cases (i.e. patients with down-staged hepatocellular carcinoma or those with high model of endstage liver disease scores, but with expected lower intensive care unit (ICU) stay), and fulminant hepatic failure cases. Finally, patients on the waiting list were fully informed about the risks of transplantation during the pandemic and we emphasized the importance of self-isolation afterwards.
In a first phase, which lasted from March 24 th to April 30 th , we performed 14 deceased-donor liver transplantations (DDLT). Despite all of the adopted preventative measures, six recipients developed COVID-19 in the early postoperative period. One patient acquired SARS-CoV-2 in the community, and the other five acquired the disease during their index hospitalization, most probably secondary to nosocomial spread (4). We hypothesize that despite the screening of donors and recipients, our in-hospital barrier measures were not optimal, perhaps because our building was originally dedicated to the treatment of non-COVID-19 patients patients.
After this period, protocols with specific precautionary measures were reinforced and broadened, and we considered all patients and healthcare professionals as potential SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic carriers. These protocols encompassed the operation rooms, ICUs, and hospital wards. We also established an exclusive ICU for transplanted patients. All hospital personnel were trained to wear personal protective equipment, including N95 masks, protective glasses, and gowns during all clinical activities. All patients were requested to wear surgical masks while within the hospital facilities. Moreover, hospital visitation was banned and patients were advised to maintain strict social isolation after discharge. At the same time, the government health agency also advocated universal mask use in the community. We limited transplantation procedures to extremely urgent cases for 2 weeks. As a result, in a second phase lasting from May 14 th to July 1 st , we performed 14 DDLT and only one DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2377 Copyright & 2020 CLINICS -This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
No potential conflict of interest was reported.
Received for publication on August 28, 2020. Accepted for publication on September 4, 2020 recipient developed COVID-19, most likely a community acquired infection (Table 1).
In conclusion, even though SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early postoperative period after LT has been reported by some centers (1,(5)(6)(7)(8), those that adopted multimodal strategies were able to successfully prevent such infections (2,3). By adopting more extensive in-hospital measures and by establishing tailored discharge plans, we reduced our infection rate from 42.85% to 7.14%, despite an increase in the number of new cases in the city. Since new waves of COVID-19 are expected in the future, we hope that this data may aid other centers in managing transplantation activities during the COVID-19 era.