Version 1. F1000Res. 2016; 5: F1000 Faculty Rev-887.
Substance use during pregnancy
a,1
Ariadna Forray
1Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
1Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article has been
cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Prenatal substance use is a critical public health concern that is linked with several harmful maternal and fetal consequences. The most frequently used substance in pregnancy is tobacco, followed by alcohol, cannabis and other illicit substances. Unfortunately, polysubstance use in pregnancy is common, as well as psychiatric comorbidity, environmental stressors, and limited and disrupted parental care, all of which can compound deleterious maternal and fetal outcomes. There are few existing treatments for prenatal substance use and these mainly comprise behavioral and psychosocial interventions. Contingency management has been shown to be the most efficacious of these. The purpose of this review is to examine the recent literature on the prenatal use of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids, including the effects of these on maternal and fetal health and the current therapeutic options.
Keywords: drug abuse, pregancy, prenatal substance use
Introduction
In the United States, women comprise 40% of those with a lifetime drug use disorder and 26% of those who meet criteria for both an alcohol and drug use disorder during the prior 12 months
1. Furthermore, women are at highest risk for developing a substance use disorder during their reproductive years (18–44), especially ages 18–29
2. This means that women who are pregnant or soon to become pregnant are at increased risk for substance abuse. According to a national survey conducted in the United States in 2012, 5.9% of pregnant women use illicit drugs, 8.5% drink alcohol and 15.9% smoke cigarettes
3, resulting in over 380,000 offspring exposed to illicit substances, over 550,000 exposed to alcohol and over one million exposed to tobacco in utero. Similar patterns of use have been observed in Europe
4,
5 and Australia
6. The most commonly used substance in pregnancy is nicotine, followed by alcohol, marijuana and cocaine
7,
8. However, polysubstance use is as high as 50% in some studies
7,
9. Recently, there has been an increase in opiate use in pregnancy. Between 2000 and 2009, the United States saw a five-fold increase in opiate use in pregnancy, coincident with an “epidemic” of opiate prescription misuse
10–
12.
There is little information available on the extent of substance use, other than tobacco, among pregnant women in low-income and middle-income countries. The overall prevalence of tobacco use in these countries is 2.6%, with some countries having much higher maternal rates– up to 15%
13. While data on illicit substance use in pregnancy is lacking for most middle- and low-income countries, according to the World Health Organization, cannabis is the most common illicit drug worldwide, followed by amphetamine-type stimulants and opiates
14, and, as such, they are likely to be used by women of reproductive age. The limited data available for Africa is from South Africa, and indicates that between 3.6 and 8.8% of pregnant women use illicit substances and 19.6% use alcohol
15. The most commonly used illicit substances in South Africa include methamphetamine and cannabis
16. Opiate use has also increased in places like Africa and Asia
17, and is likely to become more prevalent in pregnancy.
Prenatal substance use can bring about several deleterious consequences for both mother and baby, as described in detail below. The concern for the impact of substances on the developing fetus can motivate some women to curb their drug and alcohol use during pregnancy
18. In the only prospective study on prenatal substance use, 96% of women with heaving drinking, 78% of women with marijuana use, 73% of women with cocaine use, and 32% of cigarette smokers succeeded in achieving abstinence during pregnancy
9. Offsetting the reduction in pregnancy-related use is the dramatic rise in substance use from 6 to 12 months postpartum
9. The study showed relapse in 58% of abstinent smokers, 51% of abstinent women who used alcohol, 41% of abstinent women who used marijuana and 27% of abstinent women who used cocaine in the 3 months following delivery
9. Thus, while the levels of abstinence in pregnancy may be high, the impact of this is diminished due to the high rates of relapse postpartum. Unfortunately, maternal relapse happens at a time of high childcare needs and when infant development is dependent on maternal bonding. It is also important to note that this was a study conducted in the United States and that the levels of abstinence may not be equivalent in other countries, especially middle- and low-income countries where women may encounter significant socioeconomic stressors, low levels of education, and limited available treatments for substance use.
As evidenced by these data, substance use in pregnancy is still a critical public health concern. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview of the pregnancy outcomes, neonatal and long-term developmental consequences of prenatal substance use, and current available treatments for pregnant women.
Adverse effects of substance use in pregnancy
Heavy alcohol use in pregnancy has been associated with a range of negative birth outcomes, including increased risks of miscarriage
19, stillbirth and infant mortality
20,
21, congenital anomalies
22, low birthweight
23, reduced gestational age
24, preterm delivery
25, and small-for-gestational age
22,
26,
27. The evidence for low to moderate alcohol use in pregnancy has either been inconclusive
28 or shown no increased risk for these adverse pregnancy outcomes
29. Alcohol use in pregnancy has the most well established adverse fetal health effects
30–
32 and is associated with the development of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
33–
35 and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes
36. In addition, prenatal drinking is associated with long-term effects, such as cognitive and behavioral challenges
37,
38, adverse speech and language outcomes
39, executive functioning deficits in children
40, and psychosocial consequences in adulthood
41.
Smoking during pregnancy exerts direct adverse effects on birth outcomes, including damage to the umbilical cord structure
42, miscarriage
43, increased risk for ectopic pregnancy
44, low birthweight
45–
47, placental abruption
45,
46,
48, preterm birth
45,
49, and increased infant mortality
45,
46,
48. Also of concern are the deleterious health effects of second-hand smoke on newborns, which include higher rates of respiratory and ear infections, sudden infant death syndrome, behavioral dysfunction and cognitive impairment
50. Additionally, women who were smokers before pregnancy might stop breastfeeding early so that they can take up smoking again
51.
Some pregnant women view cannabis use as harmless in pregnancy
52; however, it has been linked with several deleterious effects, including preterm labor, low birthweight, small-for-gestational age, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit
53. Prenatal cannabis use has also been linked with adverse consequences for the growth of fetal and adolescent brains
52, reduced attention and executive functioning skills, poorer academic achievement and more behavioral problems
54. The adverse effects of marijuana are frequently observed with comorbid substance use, and are greatest in heavy users.
The extent of the adverse effects of cocaine use in pregnancy has been overestimated at times. However, there have been several large and thorough studies recently, which have all identified several risk factors associated with cocaine use during pregnancy, including premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, preterm birth, low birthweight, and small for gestational age infants
55,
56. There have been inconsistent reports on the long-term effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on language, motor, and cognitive development, with a few studies describing positive findings
57,
58 and some studies reporting very little or no effects
59. This inconsistency is probably connected to the confounding effects of the postnatal environment, including unsteady and disordered home environments, dysfunctional parenting, and heavy maternal polysubstance use
60–
62. Similar to cocaine use in pregnancy, methamphetamine use is linked with shorter gestational ages, lower birthweight
63, fetal loss
64, developmental and behavioral defects
65, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and intrauterine fetal death
66.
Opioid use in pregnancy is correlated with a greater risk of low birthweight, respiratory problems, third trimester bleeding, toxemia and mortality
12,
67. Maternal opiate use is associated with an increased risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), whereby opiate exposure in utero triggers a postnatal withdrawal syndrome
12. Anywhere from 45 to 94% of infants exposed to opioids in utero, including methadone and buprenorphine, can be affected by NAS
12. NAS results in substantial neonatal morbidity and increased healthcare utilization
12,
67, and consists of an array of signs and symptoms, including irritability, feeding difficulties, tremors, hypertonia, emesis, loose stools, seizures, and respiratory distress
68. Opioid exposure in pregnancy has also been associated with postnatal growth deficiency, microcephaly, neurobehavioral problems, and sudden infant death syndrome
67. Cigarette smoking, which is very common in pregnant women with an opioid use disorder (77–95%)
69,
70, may confound the effect of opioid use on poor pregnancy outcomes.
A significant point to take into account is that the undesirable consequences of prenatal substance use are confounded by the frequency of coexisting substance use and comorbid psychiatric illness
71,
72. Women with substance use disorders also frequently experience inadequate prenatal care, poor nutrition, chronic medical problems, poverty, and domestic violence
73,
74. Furthermore, substance use in pregnancy may also result in an early dysfunctional maternal-infant relationship that can potentiate the negative effects of prenatal drug exposure
60,
61.
Treatment of substance use in pregnancy
There are only a small number of effective therapies for substance use in pregnancy, which primarily involve behavioral counseling (see
). Brief interventions
75, in particular those that utilize motivational interviewing
76,
77, have been shown to reduce prenatal alcohol use. A recent randomized trial utilizing a telephone-based brief intervention suggests that this method may achieve similar results to the in-person intervention method of moderating prenatal drinking
78. Some additional interventions to reduce prenatal drinking that have recently been described include screening via non-healthcare community workers
79, counseling by midwives
80, and multimedia and educational efforts aimed at improving awareness
81.
Table 1.
Description of behavioral interventions for substance use disorders.
Contingency
management (CM) | Based on the principle of positive reinforcement as a means of operant conditioning to influence behavior
change. The premise behind CM is to systematically use reinforcement techniques, usually monetary vouchers,
to modify behavior in a positive and supportive manner. Originally used for the treatment of cocaine users, it has
since been used for opioids, marijuana, cigarettes, alcohol, benzodiazepines, and other drugs. |
Motivational
interviewing (MI) | A patient-centered, collaborative and highly empathic counselling style for eliciting behavior change by helping
clients to explore and resolve ambivalence. It draws from the trans theoretical model of change in order to
improve treatment readiness and retention. |
Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT) | A psychotherapeutic treatment that uses an easy-to-learn set of strategies to help patients understand the
situations that lead them to undesirable thoughts, feelings, or behaviors, to then avoid those situations when
possible, and to deal more effectively with such situations when they occur. The goal of these strategies is to
break old patterns of responding and replace them with new ones. |
As with alcohol, behavioral counseling is the main treatment for smoking cessation and relapse prevention in pregnant women. Unfortunately, psychotherapeutic interventions have had only moderate success
82–
85. Pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation have not been evaluated with respect to their safety and efficacy in pregnant and postpartum women
82,
86. Randomized clinical trials with nicotine replacement therapy in pregnant women have demonstrated limited efficacy in increasing the rates of abstinence
87–
90. The most successful intervention for prenatal smoking cessation is contingency management (CM) with financial incentives
91–
93, which has also reportedly improved birth outcomes
94.
Treatments specifically aimed at prenatal cannabis use are lacking. The current recommendation for lowering the use of cannabis in pregnancy includes the screening of pregnant women to increase the early identification of cannabis use
52. Motivational interviewing (MI)
95,
96, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
95–
99, and CM therapies have had some success in reducing marijuana use in women, but they have not been evaluated specifically with pregnant users. Thus, novel interventions that explicitly target cannabis use are vital, particularly given the current tendency towards marijuana legalization.
Existing evidence-based treatments for cocaine use in pregnancy include CBT, MI and CM
100. As with smoking, CM is the intervention that shows most potential for treating cocaine-using pregnant women
62. A randomized trial found that CM was associated with much longer duration of cocaine abstinence, higher number of cocaine-negative urine tests, and a greater proportion of documented abstinence when compared to community reinforcement approach and twelve-step facilitation
101. Currently, there are no evidence-based pharmacological treatments for prenatal cocaine use. Nevertheless, a recent randomized, placebo-controlled trial supports the use of oral micronized progesterone as an intervention for postpartum cocaine use
102. The study showed that women randomized to placebo had more self-reported cocaine use compared to women receiving micronized progesterone during the 12 weeks of the trial
102. While these are preliminary findings and will require confirmation in a larger clinical trial, they show promise for the application of progesterone in postpartum women to reduce their cocaine use. Treatments for other stimulant use, such as methamphetamine, are limited. Research into reinforcement-based therapy (RBT) combined with a women-focused intervention among pregnant methamphetamine users reported a reduction in methamphetamine use over time
103. However, there were no substantial distinctions between the intervention and control conditions
103, not unlike another study using RBT to treat stimulant use in pregnancy
104. RBT seems to have potential as an intervention for methamphetamine use but more research is required.
Methadone maintenance is the standard care for pregnant women with opiate use disorders
105. Conversion from illicit opioid use to opioid maintenance therapy in a medically supervised setting decreases maternal and neonatal morbidity. Methadone maintenance offers greater relapse prevention with a steady opioid dosing regimen, reduces risk-taking behavior, enhances compliance with prenatal care, and leads to better neonatal outcomes
106. On the other hand, medication-assisted withdrawal, that is detoxification by gradually reducing the dose of an opioid substitute medication, is associated with a high opioid relapse rate and higher fetal morbidity and mortality rates
106. Buprenorphine has recently emerged as another potential therapy for opioid use in pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial that compared methadone and buprenorphine in pregnant opioid users showed that infants whose mothers received buprenorphine needed less treatment for NAS, substantially lower doses of morphine to treat NAS symptoms, and had shorter stays in hospital, compared to the infants of women given methadone
107. Notably, buprenorphine had lower retention rates with flexibly delivered doses and low fixed doses compared to methadone
108. However, buprenorphine and methadone are equally effective when given as fixed medium or high doses
108. CM has likewise been reported to be effective in treating opioid use in pregnancy, by significantly increasing abstinence and treatment attendance compared to controls
109. Thus, CM appears to be an important addition to methadone or buprenorphine treatment in pregnant women.
Breastfeeding and postpartum substance use
Breastfeeding has the potential to be a useful tool for substance use in the postpartum period. Breastfeeding is the only available intervention shown to reduce NAS severity in opioid-exposed newborns
110,
111. Breastfeeding might also be protective for postpartum relapse. For example, among breastfeeding smokers, 10% stop breastfeeding because of smoking, and over half of recent or current smokers reported that smoking affected their infant feeding decision
112. In addition, non-current smokers are more likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding compared to current smokers
113,
114. Therefore, the promotion of breastfeeding might prevent or delay postpartum relapse.
While studies evaluating the potential role of breastfeeding as an intervention for substance use postpartum are limited, the rationale for such interventions is clear. Lactation reduces the HPA response to physical stress
115. A behavior that promotes relaxation and reduces stress would be helpful to women with substance use disorders since psychosocial stress increases cravings
116. While hormones released during lactation may mediate stress reduction, such hormones have other properties that may help women cope with addiction. Considerable attention has been dedicated to oxytocin, a hormone released during delivery and lactation. Oxytocin administration is under investigation for treatment of drug and alcohol use disorders
116–
118. In addition, lactation is positively associated with cognitive and motor development in the infant
119. It is well known that stable attachment among children increases resiliency and protects against the development of addiction later in life
120,
121. Thus, an intervention that promotes lactation and intimacy through skin-to-skin contact may enhance stable attachment, and have the intergenerational benefit of protecting offspring from the development of addictive and other problematic behaviors
120,
122,
123.
Conclusions
Substance use in pregnancy remains a significant public health problem, which can lead to several harmful maternal and neonatal outcomes. Which drug is being used and the degree of use, as well as the point of exposure, all influence the effects of drug use in pregnancy. In addition to the direct effects of drug exposure in utero, several other variables are associated with deleterious maternal and infant consequences, including psychiatric comorbidity, polysubstance use, limited prenatal care, environmental stressors and disrupted parental care. In conjunction, these factors can negatively influence pregnancy and infant outcomes, and should be taken in to account when developing interventions for prenatal substance use treatments. Many of the health problems associated with substance use in the prenatal period could be avoided given effective and well-timed medical care or intervention. Empirically-driven interventions for prenatal substance are needed. While there are few treatment options for substance use in pregnancy, CM seems to show the greatest promise as an effective therapy for the substances in which it has been studied. Future research needs to focus on developing tailored, safe, and acceptable treatments that can capitalize on pregnancy as a “teachable” moment that can motivate women to adopt risk-reducing health behaviors
124–
127.
Notes
[version 1; referees: 2 approved]
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Notes
Editorial Note on the Review Process
F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious
F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).
The referees who approved this article are:
Kirsten A Donald, Division of Developmental Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
No competing interests were disclosed.
Oscar Garcia-Algar, Unitat de Recerca Infància i Entorn (URIE), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
No competing interests were disclosed.
References
1.
Stinson FS, Grant BF, Dawson DA, et al. :
Comorbidity between DSM-IV alcohol and specific drug use disorders in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2005;80(1):105–16.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.03.009
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]2.
Compton WM, Thomas YF, Stinson FS, et al. :
Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2007;64(5):566–576.
10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.566
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]3.
United States Department of H, Human Services. Substance A, Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health S Quality:
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2012. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor].2013.
10.3886/ICPSR34933.v3
[Cross Ref]4.
(EMCDDA) EMCfDaDA:
The State of the Drugs Problem in Europe.Luxembourg.2011.
10.2810/44330
[Cross Ref]5.
El Marroun H, Tiemeier H, Jaddoe VW, et al. :
Demographic, emotional and social determinants of cannabis use in early pregnancy: the Generation R study.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2008;98(3):218–226.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.010
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]6.
Passey ME, Sanson-Fisher RW, D'Este CA, et al. :
Tobacco, alcohol and cannabis use during pregnancy: clustering of risks.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2014;134:44–50.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.008
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]7.
Ebrahim SH, Gfroerer J:
Pregnancy-related substance use in the United States during 1996–1998.
Obstet Gynecol.
2003;101(2):374–379.
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02588-7
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]8.
Howell EM, Heiser N, Harrington M:
A review of recent findings on substance abuse treatment for pregnant women.
J Subst Abuse Treat.
1999;16(3):195–219.
10.1016/S0740-5472(98)00032-4
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]9.
Forray A, Merry B, Lin H, et al. :
Perinatal substance use: a prospective evaluation of abstinence and relapse.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2015;150:147–155.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.027
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.
Hayes MJ, Brown MS:
Epidemic of prescription opiate abuse and neonatal abstinence.
JAMA.
2012;307(18):1974–1975.
10.1001/jama.2012.4526
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]11.
Desai RJ, Hernandez-Diaz S, Bateman BT, et al. :
Increase in prescription opioid use during pregnancy among Medicaid-enrolled women.
Obstet Gynecol.
2014;123(5):997–1002.
10.1097/AOG.0000000000000208
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]12.
Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, et al. :
Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000–2009.
JAMA.
2012;307(18):1934–1940.
10.1001/jama.2012.3951
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]13.
Caleyachetty R, Tait CA, Kengne AP, et al. :
Tobacco use in pregnant women: analysis of data from Demographic and Health Surveys from 54 low-income and middle-income countries.
Lancet Glob Health.
2014;2(9):e513–e520.
10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70283-9
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]14.
Organization WH:
World Drug Report.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime;2012.
Reference Source
15.
Petersen Williams P, Jordaan E, Mathews C, et al. :
Alcohol and Other Drug Use during Pregnancy among Women Attending Midwife Obstetric Units in the Cape Metropole, South Africa.
Adv Prev Med.
2014;2014: 871427.
10.1155/2014/871427
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]16.
Jones HE, Browne FA, Myers BJ, et al. :
Pregnant and nonpregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa: drug use, sexual behavior, and the need for comprehensive services.
Int J Pediatr.
2011;2011: 353410.
10.1155/2011/353410
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]17.
Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, et al. :
Global burden of disease attributable to illicit drug use and dependence: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
Lancet.
2013;382(9904):1564–1574.
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61530-5
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]18.
Higgins PG, Clough DH, Frank B, et al. :
Changes in health behaviors made by pregnant substance users.
Int J Addict.
1995;30(10):1323–1333.
10.3109/10826089509105137
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]19.
Armstrong BG, McDonald AD, Sloan M:
Cigarette, alcohol, and coffee consumption and spontaneous abortion.
Am J Public Health.
1992;82(1):85–87.
10.2105/AJPH.82.1.85
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]20.
O'Leary C, Jacoby P, D'Antoine H, et al. :
Heavy prenatal alcohol exposure and increased risk of stillbirth.
BJOG.
2012;119(8):945–952.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03333.x
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]21.
Strandberg-Larsen K, Grønboek M, Andersen AM, et al. :
Alcohol drinking pattern during pregnancy and risk of infant mortality.
Epidemiology.
2009;20(6):884–891.
10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181bbd46c
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]22.
Rosett HL, Weiner L, Lee A, et al. :
Patterns of alcohol consumption and fetal development.
Obstet Gynecol.
1983;61(5):539–546.
[PubMed]23.
Passaro KT, Little RE, Savitz DA, et al. :
The effect of maternal drinking before conception and in early pregnancy on infant birthweight. The ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood.
Epidemiology.
1996;7(4):377–383.
[PubMed]24.
Sulaiman ND, Florey CD, Taylor DJ, et al. :
Alcohol consumption in Dundee primigravidas and its effects on outcome of pregnancy.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed).
1988;296(6635):1500–1503.
10.1136/bmj.296.6635.1500
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]25.
O'Leary CM, Nassar N, Kurinczuk JJ, et al. :
The effect of maternal alcohol consumption on fetal growth and preterm birth.
BJOG.
2009;116(3):390–400.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02058.x
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]26.
Mills JL, Graubard BI, Harley EE, et al. :
Maternal alcohol consumption and birth weight. How much drinking during pregnancy is safe?
JAMA.
1984;252(14):1875–1879.
10.1001/jama.1984.03350140021018
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]27.
Whitehead N, Lipscomb L:
Patterns of alcohol use before and during pregnancy and the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth.
Am J Epidemiol.
2003;158(7):654–662.
10.1093/aje/kwg201
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]28.
Henderson J, Gray R, Brocklehurst P:
Systematic review of effects of low-moderate prenatal alcohol exposure on pregnancy outcome.
BJOG.
2007;114(3):243–252.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01163.x
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]29.
Lundsberg LS, Illuzzi JL, Belanger K, et al. :
Low-to-moderate prenatal alcohol consumption and the risk of selected birth outcomes: a prospective cohort study.
Ann Epidemiol.
2015;25(1):46–54.e3.
10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.10.011
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]30.
Srikartika VM, O'Leary CM:
Pregnancy outcomes of mothers with an alcohol-related diagnosis: a population-based cohort study for the period 1983–2007.
BJOG.
2015;122(6):795–804.
10.1111/1471-0528.12983
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]31.
DeVido J, Bogunovic O, Weiss RD:
Alcohol use disorders in pregnancy.
Harv Rev Psychiatry.
2015;23(2):112–121.
10.1097/HRP.0000000000000070
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]32.
Waterman EH, Pruett D, Caughey AB:
Reducing fetal alcohol exposure in the United States.
Obstet Gynecol Surv.
2013;68(5):367–378.
10.1097/OGX.0b013e31828736d5
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]33.
Hankin JR:
Fetal alcohol syndrome prevention research.
Alcohol Res Health.
2002;26(1):58–65.
[PubMed]34.
Esper LH, Furtado EF:
Identifying maternal risk factors associated with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: a systematic review.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
2014;23(10):877–889.
10.1007/s00787-014-0603-2
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]35.
Fox DJ, Pettygrove S, Cunniff C, et al. :
Fetal alcohol syndrome among children aged 7-9 years - Arizona, Colorado, and New York, 2010.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.
2015;64(3):54–57.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]36.
Vall O, Salat-Batlle J, Garcia-Algar O:
Alcohol consumption during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
J Epidemiol Community Health.
2015;69(10):927–9.
10.1136/jech-2014-203938
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]37.
Green CR, Roane J, Hewitt A, et al. :
Frequent behavioural challenges in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a needs-based assessment reported by caregivers and clinicians.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol.
2014;21(3):e405–420.
[PubMed]38.
Bakoyiannis I, Gkioka E, Pergialiotis V, et al. :
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and cognitive functions of young children.
Rev Neurosci.
2014;25(5):631–639.
10.1515/revneuro-2014-0029
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]39.
O'Keeffe LM, Greene RA, Kearney PM:
The effect of moderate gestational alcohol consumption during pregnancy on speech and language outcomes in children: a systematic review.
Syst Rev.
2014;3:1.
10.1186/2046-4053-3-1
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]40.
Fuglestad AJ, Whitley ML, Carlson SM, et al. :
Executive functioning deficits in preschool children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.
Child Neuropsychol.
2015;21(6):716–31.
10.1080/09297049.2014.933792
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]41.
Rangmar J, Hjern A, Vinnerljung B, et al. :
Psychosocial outcomes of fetal alcohol syndrome in adulthood.
Pediatrics.
2015;135(1):e52–58.
10.1542/peds.2014-1915
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]42.
Rua Ede A, Porto ML, Ramos JP, et al. :
Effects of tobacco smoking during pregnancy on oxidative stress in the umbilical cord and mononuclear blood cells of neonates.
J Biomed Sci.
2014;21:105.
10.1186/s12929-014-0105-z
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]43.
Pineles BL, Park E, Samet JM:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of miscarriage and maternal exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy.
Am J Epidemiol.
2014;179(7):807–823.
10.1093/aje/kwt334
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]44.
Horne AW, Brown JK, Nio-Kobayashi J, et al. :
The association between smoking and ectopic pregnancy: why nicotine is BAD for your fallopian tube.
PLoS One.
2014;9(2):e89400.
10.1371/journal.pone.0089400
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]45.
Salihu HM, Wilson RE:
Epidemiology of prenatal smoking and perinatal outcomes.
Early Hum Dev.
2007;83(11):713–720.
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.08.002
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]46.
Cnattingius S:
The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes.
Nicotine Tob Res.
2004;6(Suppl 2):S125–140.
10.1080/14622200410001669187
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]47.
Quesada O, Gotman N, Howell HB, et al. :
Prenatal hazardous substance use and adverse birth outcomes.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
2012;25(8):1222–1227.
10.3109/14767058.2011.602143
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]48.
Tikkanen M, Nuutila M, Hiilesmaa V, et al. :
Prepregnancy risk factors for placental abruption.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2006;85(1):40–44.
10.1080/00016340500324241
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]49.
Ion R, Bernal AL:
Smoking and Preterm Birth.
Reprod Sci.
2015;22(8):918–926.
10.1177/1933719114556486
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]50.
DiFranza JR, Aligne CA, Weitzman M:
Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children's health.
Pediatrics.
2004;113(4 Suppl):1007–1015.
[PubMed]51.
Ratner PA, Johnson JL, Bottorff JL:
Smoking relapse and early weaning among postpartum women: is there an association?
Birth.
1999;26(2):76–82.
10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00076.x
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]52.
Jaques SC, Kingsbury A, Henshcke P, et al. :
Cannabis, the pregnant woman and her child: weeding out the myths.
J Perinatol.
2014;34(6):417–424.
10.1038/jp.2013.180
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]53.
Hayatbakhsh MR, Flenady VJ, Gibbons KS, et al. :
Birth outcomes associated with cannabis use before and during pregnancy.
Pediatr Res.
2012;71(2):215–9.
10.1038/pr.2011.25
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]54.
Warner TD, Roussos-Ross D, Behnke M:
It's not your mother's marijuana: effects on maternal-fetal health and the developing child.
Clin Perinatol.
2014;41(4):877–894.
10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.009
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]55.
Addis A, Moretti ME, Ahmed Syed F, et al. :
Fetal effects of cocaine: an updated meta-analysis.
Reprod Toxicol.
2001;15(4):341–369.
10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00136-8
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]56.
Gouin K, Murphy K, Shah PS:
Effects of cocaine use during pregnancy on low birthweight and preterm birth: systematic review and metaanalyses.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2011;204(4):340.e1–e12.
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.013
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]57.
Chaplin TM, Freiburger MB, Mayes LC, et al. :
Prenatal cocaine exposure, gender, and adolescent stress response: a prospective longitudinal study.
Neurotoxicol Teratol.
2010;32(6):595–604.
10.1016/j.ntt.2010.08.007
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]58.
Bandstra ES, Vogel AL, Morrow CE, et al. :
Severity of prenatal cocaine exposure and child language functioning through age seven years: a longitudinal latent growth curve analysis.
Subst Use Misuse.
2004;39(1):25–59.
10.1081/JA-120027765
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]59.
Frank DA, Augustyn M, Knight WG, et al. :
Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review.
JAMA.
2001;285(12):1613–1625.
10.1001/jama.285.12.1613
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]60.
Mansoor E, Morrow CE, Accornero VH, et al. :
Longitudinal effects of prenatal cocaine use on mother-child interactions at ages 3 and 5 years.
J Dev Behav Pediatr.
2012;33(1):32–41.
10.1097/DBP.0b013e31823968ab
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]61.
Strathearn L, Mayes LC:
Cocaine addiction in mothers: potential effects on maternal care and infant development.
Ann N Y Acad Sci.
2010;1187:172–183.
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05142.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]62.
Hull L, May J, Farrell-Moore D, et al. :
Treatment of cocaine abuse during pregnancy: translating research to clinical practice.
Curr Psychiatry Rep.
2010;12(5):454–461.
10.1007/s11920-010-0138-2
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]63.
Wright TE, Schuetter R, Tellei J, et al. :
Methamphetamines and pregnancy outcomes.
J Addict Med.
2015;9(2):111–117.
10.1097/ADM.0000000000000101
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]64.
Brecht ML, Herbeck DM:
Pregnancy and fetal loss reported by methamphetamine-using women.
Subst Abuse.
2014;8:25–33.
10.4137/SART.S14125
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]65.
Dyk J, Ramanjam V, Church P, et al. :
Maternal methamphetamine use in pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental and behavioral deficits in children.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol.
2014;21(2):e185–196.
[PubMed]66.
Gorman MC, Orme KS, Nguyen NT, et al. :
Outcomes in pregnancies complicated by methamphetamine use.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2014;211(4):429.e1–7.
10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.005
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]67.
Minozzi S, Amato L, Bellisario C, et al. :
Maintenance agonist treatments for opiate-dependent pregnant women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2013;12: CD006318.
10.1002/14651858.CD006318.pub3
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]68.
Hudak ML, Tan RC, COMMITTEE ON DRUGS et al. :
Neonatal drug withdrawal.
Pediatrics.
2012;129(2):e540–560.
10.1542/peds.2011-3212
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]69.
Jones HE, Heil SH, Tuten M, et al. :
Cigarette smoking in opioid-dependent pregnant women: neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2013;131(3):271–277.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.11.019
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]70.
Chisolm MS, Tuten M, Brigham EC, et al. :
Relationship between cigarette use and mood/anxiety disorders among pregnant methadone-maintained patients.
Am J Addict.
2009;18(5):422–429.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]71.
Tuten M, Heil SH, O'Grady KE, et al. :
The impact of mood disorders on the delivery and neonatal outcomes of methadone-maintained pregnant patients.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse.
2009;35(5):358–363.
10.1080/00952990903108231
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]72.
Benningfield MM, Arria AM, Kaltenbach K, et al. :
Co-occurring psychiatric symptoms are associated with increased psychological, social, and medical impairment in opioid dependent pregnant women.
Am J Addict.
2010;19(5):416–421.
10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00064.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]73.
Havens JR, Simmons LA, Shannon LM, et al. :
Factors associated with substance use during pregnancy: results from a national sample.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2009;99(1–3):89–95.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.07.010
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]74.
Hutchins E, DiPietro J:
Psychosocial risk factors associated with cocaine use during pregnancy: a case-control study.
Obstet Gynecol.
1997;90(1):142–147.
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00181-6
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]75.
Chang G, McNamara TK, Orav EJ, et al. :
Brief intervention for prenatal alcohol use: a randomized trial.
Obstet Gynecol.
2005;105(5 Pt 1):991–998.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000157109.05453.84
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]76.
Osterman RL, Carle AC, Ammerman RT, et al. :
Single-session motivational intervention to decrease alcohol use during pregnancy.
J Subst Abuse Treat.
2014;47(1):10–19.
10.1016/j.jsat.2014.01.009
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]77.
Rendall-Mkosi K, Morojele N, London L, et al. :
A randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing to prevent risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Addiction.
2013;108(4):725–732.
10.1111/add.12081
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]78.
Wilton G, Moberg DP, Van Stelle KR, et al. :
A randomized trial comparing telephone versus in-person brief intervention to reduce the risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy.
J Subst Abuse Treat.
2013;45(5):389–394.
10.1016/j.jsat.2013.06.006
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]79.
O'Connor MJ, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Tomlinson M, et al. :
Screening for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders by nonmedical community workers.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol.
2014;21(3):e442–452.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]80.
van der Wulp NY, Hoving C, Eijmael K, et al. :
Reducing alcohol use during pregnancy via health counseling by midwives and internet-based computer-tailored feedback: a cluster randomized trial.
J Med Internet Res.
2014;16(12):e274.
10.2196/jmir.3493
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]81.
Crawford-Williams F, Fielder A, Mikocka-Walus A, et al. :
A critical review of public health interventions aimed at reducing alcohol consumption and/or increasing knowledge among pregnant women.
Drug Alcohol Rev.
2015;34(2):154–161.
10.1111/dar.12152
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]82.
Agboola S, McNeill A, Coleman T, et al. :
A systematic review of the effectiveness of smoking relapse prevention interventions for abstinent smokers.
Addiction.
2010;105(8):1362–1380.
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02996.x
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]83.
Heckman CJ, Egleston BL, Hofmann MT:
Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tob Control.
2010;19(5):410–416.
10.1136/tc.2009.033175
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]84.
Levitt C, Shaw E, Wong S, et al. :
Systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: effectiveness of interventions for smoking relapse prevention, cessation, and reduction in postpartum women.
Birth.
2007;34(4):341–347.
10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00194.x
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]85.
Reitzel LR, Vidrine JI, Businelle MS, et al. :
Preventing postpartum smoking relapse among diverse low-income women: a randomized clinical trial.
Nicotine Tob Res.
2010;12(4):326–335.
10.1093/ntr/ntq001
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]86.
Oncken CA, Kranzler HR:
What do we know about the role of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation before or during pregnancy?
Nicotine Tob Res.
2009;11(11):1265–1273.
10.1093/ntr/ntp136
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]87.
Essex HN, Parrott S, Wu Q, et al. :
Cost-Effectiveness of Nicotine Patches for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy: A Placebo Randomized Controlled Trial (SNAP).
Nicotine Tob Res.
2015.17(6):636–42.
10.1093/ntr/ntu258
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]88.
El-Mohandes AA, Windsor R, Tan S, et al. :
A randomized clinical trial of trans-dermal nicotine replacement in pregnant African-American smokers.
Matern Child Health J.
2013;17(5):897–906.
10.1007/s10995-012-1069-9
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]89.
Cooper S, Lewis S, Thornton JG, et al. :
The SNAP trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy--clinical effectiveness and safety until 2 years after delivery, with economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess.
2014;18(54):1–128.
10.3310/hta18540
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]90.
Coleman T, Cooper S, Thornton JG, et al. :
A randomized trial of nicotine-replacement therapy patches in pregnancy.
N Engl J Med.
2012;366(9):808–818.
10.1056/NEJMoa1109582
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]91.
Chamberlain C, O'Mara-Eves A, Oliver S, et al. :
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2013;10: CD001055.
10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]92.
Higgins ST, Washio Y, Heil SH, et al. :
Financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant and newly postpartum women.
Prev Med.
2012;55(Suppl):S33–S40.
10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.016
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]93.
Ierfino D, Mantzari E, Hirst J, et al. :
Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a single-arm intervention study assessing cessation and gaming.
Addiction.
2015;110(4):680–688.
10.1111/add.12817
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]94.
Higgins ST, Bernstein IM, Washio Y, et al. :
Effects of smoking cessation with voucher-based contingency management on birth outcomes.
Addiction.
2010;105(11):2023–2030.
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03073.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]95.
Hoch E, Bühringer G, Pixa A, et al. :
CANDIS treatment program for cannabis use disorders: findings from a randomized multi-site translational trial.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2014;134:185–193.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.028
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]96.
Hoch E, Noack R, Henker J, et al. :
Efficacy of a targeted cognitive-behavioral treatment program for cannabis use disorders (CANDIS).
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol.
2012;22(4):267–280.
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.014
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]97.
Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Simpson EE:
Treating adult marijuana dependence: a test of the relapse prevention model.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
1994;62(1):92–99.
10.1037/0022-006X.62.1.92
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]98.
Carroll KM, Nich C, Lapaglia DM, et al. :
Combining cognitive behavioral therapy and contingency management to enhance their effects in treating cannabis dependence: less can be more, more or less.
Addiction.
2012;17(9):1650–1659.
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03877.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]99.
Copeland J, Swift W, Roffman R, et al. :
A randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive-behavioral interventions for cannabis use disorder.
J Subst Abuse Treat.
2001;21(2):55–64; discussion 65–6.
10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00179-9
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]100.
Terplan M, Ramanadhan S, Locke A, et al. :
Psychosocial interventions for pregnant women in outpatient illicit drug treatment programs compared to other interventions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2015;4: Cd006037.
10.1002/14651858.CD006037.pub3
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]101.
Schottenfeld RS, Moore B, Pantalon MV:
Contingency management with community reinforcement approach or twelve-step facilitation drug counseling for cocaine dependent pregnant women or women with young children.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2011;118(1):48–55.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.02.019
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]102.
Yonkers KA, Forray A, Nich C, et al. :
Progesterone Reduces Cocaine Use in Postpartum Women with a Cocaine Use Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.
Lancet Psychiatry.
2014;1(5):360–367.
10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70333-5
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]103.
Jones HE, Myers B, O'Grady KE, et al. :
Initial feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive intervention for methamphetamine-using pregnant women in South Africa.
Psychiatry J.
2014;2014: 929767.
10.1155/2014/929767
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]104.
Jones HE, O'Grady KE, Tuten M:
Reinforcement-based treatment improves the maternal treatment and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients enrolled in comprehensive care treatment.
Am J Addict.
2011;20(3):196–204.
10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00119.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]105.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment: .
Chapter 13. Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction During Pregnancy.
Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 43.
. 2005 Reference Source106.
Jones HE, O'Grady KE, Malfi D, et al. :
Methadone maintenance vs. methadone taper during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Am J Addict.
2008;17(5):372–386.
10.1080/10550490802266276
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]107.
Jones HE, Kaltenbach K, Heil SH, et al. :
Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure.
N Engl J Med.
2010;363(24):2320–2331.
10.1056/NEJMoa1005359
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]108.
Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, et al. :
Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2014;2: CD002207.
10.1002/14651858.CD002207.pub4
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]109.
Jones HE, Haug N, Silverman K, et al. :
The effectiveness of incentives in enhancing treatment attendance and drug abstinence in methadone-maintained pregnant women.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2001;61(3):297–306.
10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00152-6
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]110.
O'Connor AB, Collett A, Alto WA, et al. :
Breastfeeding rates and the relationship between breastfeeding and neonatal abstinence syndrome in women maintained on buprenorphine during pregnancy.
J Midwifery Womens Health.
2013;58(4):383–388.
10.1111/jmwh.12009
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]111.
Welle-Strand GK, Skurtveit S, Jansson LM, et al. :
Breastfeeding reduces the need for withdrawal treatment in opioid-exposed infants.
Acta Paediatr.
2013;102(11):1060–1066.
10.1111/apa.12378
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]112.
Bogen DL, Davies ED, Barnhart WC, et al. :
What do mothers think about concurrent breast-feeding and smoking?
Ambul Pediatr.
2008;8(3):200–204.
10.1016/j.ambp.2008.01.008
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]113.
Edwards N, Sims-Jones N, Breithaupt K:
Smoking in pregnancy and postpartum: relationship to mothers' choices concerning infant nutrition.
Can J Nurs Res.
1998;30(3):83–98.
[PubMed]114.
Liu J, Rosenberg KD, Sandoval AP:
Breastfeeding duration and perinatal cigarette smoking in a population-based cohort.
Am J Public Health.
2006;96(2):309–314.
10.2105/AJPH.2004.060798
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]115.
Altemus M, Deuster PA, Galliven E, et al. :
Suppression of hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to stress in lactating women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
1995;80(10):2954–2959.
10.1210/jcem.80.10.7559880
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]116.
McRae-Clark AL, Carter RE, Price KL, et al. :
Stress- and cue-elicited craving and reactivity in marijuana-dependent individuals.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2011;218(1):49–58.
10.1007/s00213-011-2376-3
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]117.
Pedersen CA, Smedley KL, Leserman J, et al. :
Intranasal oxytocin blocks alcohol withdrawal in human subjects.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2013;37(3):484–489.
10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01958.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]118.
Lee MR, Glassman M, King-Casas B, et al. :
Complexity of oxytocin's effects in a chronic cocaine dependent population.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol.
2014;24(9):1483–1491.
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.06.005
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]119.
Bernard JY, De Agostini M, Forhan A, et al. :
Breastfeeding duration and cognitive development at 2 and 3 years of age in the EDEN mother-child cohort.
J Pediatr.
2013;163(1):36–42.e1.
10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.090
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]120.
Strathearn L:
Maternal neglect: oxytocin, dopamine and the neurobiology of attachment.
J Neuroendocrinol.
2011;23(11):1054–1065.
10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02228.x
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]121.
Love TM:
Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
2014;119:49–60.
10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]122.
Tops M, Koole SL, Ijzerman H, et al. :
Why social attachment and oxytocin protect against addiction and stress: Insights from the dynamics between ventral and dorsal corticostriatal systems.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
2014;119:39–48.
10.1016/j.pbb.2013.07.015
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]123.
McGregor IS, Bowen MT:
Breaking the loop: oxytocin as a potential treatment for drug addiction.
Horm Behav.
2012;61(3):331–339.
10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.001
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]124.
Bloch M, Parascandola M:
Tobacco use in pregnancy: a window of opportunity for prevention.
Lancet Glob Health.
2014;2(9):e489–490.
10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70294-3
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]125.
Colman GJ, Joyce T:
Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy in ten states.
Am J Prev Med.
2003;24(1):29–35.
10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00574-3
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]126.
Heil SH, Herrmann ES, Badger GJ, et al. :
Examining the timing of changes in cigarette smoking upon learning of pregnancy.
Prev Med.
2014;68:58–61.
10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.034
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]127.
Kitsantas P, Gaffney KF, Wu H, et al. :
Determinants of alcohol cessation, reduction and no reduction during pregnancy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet.
2014;289(4):771–779.
10.1007/s00404-013-3056-9
[PubMed] [Cross Ref]