Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Aug; 59(8): 4424–4428.
Published online 2015 Jul 16. Prepublished online 2015 May 18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00581-15
PMCID: PMC4505228
PMID: 25987632

Superior Serum Concentrations with Posaconazole Delayed-Release Tablets Compared to Suspension Formulation in Hematological Malignancies

Abstract

Posaconazole (PCZ), approved for prophylaxis against invasive fungal disease in high-risk patients, is commercially available orally as a suspension formulation (PCZ-susp) and as a delayed-release tablet (PCZ-tab). We evaluated the serum steady-state concentrations (Css) of PCZ stratified by the administered formulation for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with myeloid malignancies (n = 150). The primary outcome was the attainment rate of the target Css of ≥700 ng/ml. Secondary outcomes included toxicity assessment (hepatotoxicity and corrected QT [QTc] interval prolongation) and breakthrough fungal infections. Patients who received the PCZ-susp (n = 118) or PCZ-tab (n = 32) and had PCZ Css assessment after at least 7 days of therapy were eligible. The median Css in the PCZ-susp group was 390 ng/ml (range, 51 to 1,870 ng/ml; mean, 436 ng/ml) compared to 1,740 ng/ml (range, 662 to 3,350 ng/ml; mean, 1,781 ng/ml) in the PCZ-tab group (P < 0.0001). The percentages of patients achieving the target goal of ≥700 ng/ml were 17% versus 97%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Hepatotoxicity (grade 2 or higher) occurred in 1 patient in each group. QTc interval measurements were available for 32 patients in the PCZ-susp group and for 12 patients in the PCZ-tab group, and prolonged intervals of grade 2 or higher were noted in 9% (n = 3) and 17% (n = 2), respectively (P = 0.6). Breakthrough fungal infections in the PCZ-susp and PCZ-tab groups were 7% (n = 8) and 3% (n = 1), respectively (P = 0.68). We conclude that the use of PCZ-tab was associated with higher Css and with the probability of achieving therapeutic goals without worsening of adverse effects.

INTRODUCTION

Posaconazole (PCZ) is a triazole antifungal agent that is approved for invasive fungal disease prophylaxis in high-risk patients. Oral formulations of PCZ are commercially available as a suspension (PCZ-susp) and as delayed-release tablets (PCZ-tab) (1). Several studies have shown that the gastrointestinal absorption and bioavailability of PCZ-susp are unpredictable and dependent on various factors, including food intake and concomitant acid suppressants (2,7). Due to its superior oral bioavailability, the PCZ-tab can be administered without regard to food intake and seems less likely to be affected by concomitant acid-suppressing medications (8,11).

PCZ concentrations follow dose-dependent pharmacokinetics at steady state with saturation of absorption of the PCZ-susp occurring at 800 mg/day (12). The current guidelines recommend as a goal steady-state concentrations (Css) of ≥700 ng/ml in the prophylaxis setting (13). Comparative studies evaluating the PCZ-susp and the newer PCZ-tab are not available. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis comparing the serum concentrations of the two formulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient population.

For this study, 152 consecutive patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who were admitted to the inpatient hematologic malignancy service at West Virginia University Hospital between February 2008 and December 2014 were considered. Adult patients with AML or high-risk MDS undergoing systemic therapy and expected to have prolonged neutropenia (defined as an expected nadir absolute neutrophil count [ANC] of <500/μl and duration of ≥7 to 10 days) and receiving PCZ prophylaxis were included. Patients received PCZ-susp (600 to 800 mg/day) between February 2008 and December 2013 and PCZ-tab (300 mg twice daily on day 1 and then 300 mg once daily) between January 2014 and December 2014. Serum PCZ concentrations were routinely obtained at our institution after at least 7 days of therapy to allow the drug to reach the Css. The posaconazole doses were administered and witnessed in the inpatient setting. Patients taking concomitant medications (other than agents used for stress ulcer prophylaxis) associated with known significant drug interactions with PCZ were excluded (n = 2; drugs were phenytoin and carbamazepine), and thus 150 patients were eligible for this analysis (1). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at West Virginia University.

Study definitions and data collection.

The primary study outcome was evaluation of the attainment rate of the target PCZ Css of 700 ng/ml in both groups (13). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of toxicities (hepatotoxicity and QTc prolongation) and breakthrough fungal infections in each group. Of note, the QTc prolongation was not routinely assessed in our patients and was only reported in patients receiving evaluation. The potential impacts of age, obesity, nutritional supplementation, diarrhea, vomiting, and mucositis and the concomitant use of acid-suppressing medications (proton pump inhibitors [PPI] and histamine antagonists [H2A]) on the PCZ Css were also evaluated.

Food intake and nutritional supplementation were evaluated by a dietitian, who stratified patients into three categories. Category 1 included patients who consumed >75% of meals or >2 nutritional supplements/day, category 2 included patients who consumed 50 to 75% of meals or 1 to 2 nutritional supplements/day, and category 3 included patients who consumed <50% of meals or had no nutritional supplements/day.

Statistical analysis.

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the baseline patient characteristics. Categorical data were described using contingency tables. Continuous variables were summarized using means with standard deviations or medians with ranges. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the independence between two categorical variables, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess differences between the 2 groups for continuous variables. Linear regression models were used to assess the PCZ concentrations for the potential impacts of age, dietary status, diarrhea, vomiting, mucositis, and concomitant stress ulcer prophylaxis use. In the multivariate analysis, a multivariable linear model was used to assess the PCZ concentrations with an interaction term of acid suppression and treatment group. Statistical inferences were based on two-sided tests at a significance level of P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and S-PLUS version 7.0 (Insightful Corp., Seattle, WA) software.

Serum posaconazole analysis.

A single serum sample was collected from patients receiving PCZ prophylaxis after a minimum of 7 days of therapy to determine the Css. All serum samples were collected approximately 4 h after the morning dose. Single serum samples were deemed suitable for this study, given the long half-life and minimal daily fluctuation of the drug (2, 14). Serum concentrations of PCZ were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay (National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO, or Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN).

Assessment of posaconazole-associated toxicity.

Toxicity was defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) version 4.03 (15). All patients were monitored for the occurrence of hepatotoxicity with liver function tests obtained at least twice a week while receiving PCZ prophylaxis. Grade 2 or higher hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) to 3 times the upper limit of normal and a 30% increase in the baseline value while receiving PCZ prophylaxis (15). QT prolongation was not routinely monitored with an electrocardiogram (ECG) unless clinically indicated. Electrocardiograms performed on patients while receiving PCZ were reviewed, and a corrected QT (QTc) interval of >480 ms was considered clinically significant (grade 2 or higher) (15).

Assessment of breakthrough infections.

While not a primary outcome of this therapeutic drug monitoring study, the occurrence of breakthrough fungal infections in patients was evaluated. For suspected pneumonia, serum samples for measurement of levels of fungal markers (galactomannan and/or 1,3-β-d-glucan assay) and chest computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained, along with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples, as indicated. Galactomannan levels were also measured in the BAL fluid samples, when possible. Routine surveillance of serum fungal markers was not performed without a clinical suspicion of a fungal infection. Blood and sterile cultures positive for yeast or Candida species were considered indicators of breakthrough infections. Standard definitions of invasive fungal infections were used to determine breakthrough fungal infections (16).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics.

The baseline characteristics of all 150 patients stratified into 2 groups, PCZ-susp (n = 118) and PCZ-tab (n = 32), are described in Table 1. The two groups were similar for all baseline variables considered, including age, gender, diagnosis, body mass index, nutritional status, presence of vomiting/diarrhea/mucositis, chemotherapy regimen, and concomitant acid suppressant use (P > 0.05).

TABLE 1

Patient characteristics

CharacteristicSuspension patients (n = 118)Tablet patients (n = 32)P
Age (yr) (median [range])57 (18–84)52 (20–75)0.22
Male gender (no. [%])59 (50)17 (53)0.84
Weight (kg) (median [range])84 (38–175)90 (61–194)0.13
BMIa (kg/m2) (median [range])30 (15–65)29.8 (22–59)0.75
BMI of >30 g/m2 (no. [%])58 (49)16 (50)0.99
Diagnosis (no. [%])
    Acute myeloid leukemia115 (97)30 (94)0.29
    MDSb3 (3)2 (6)
Chemotherapy regimen (no. [%])
    Cytarabine-anthracycline (7 + 3)80 (68)23 (72)
    High-dose cytarabine based14 (12)0 (0)
    Clofarabine based8 (7)4 (13)0.18
    Mitoxantrone-etoposide5 (4)2 (6)
    Other11 (9)3 (9)
Mucositis (no. [%])23 (19)4 (13)0.45
Diarrhea (no. [%])24 (20)6 (19)0.99
Vomiting (no. [%])14 (12)5 (16)0.56
Nutritional status (no. [%])
    Category 143 (36)19 (59)
    Category 241 (35)10 (31)0.13
    Category 318 (15)2 (6)
    Unknown16 (14)1 (3)
Acid suppression (no. [%])
    Proton pump inhibitor44 (37)11 (34)
    H2 antagonist69 (58)21 (66)0.62
    None5 (4)0 (0)
aBMI, body mass index.
bMDS, myelodysplastic syndrome.

Posaconazole concentrations.

After initiation of PCZ, serum concentration measurements were obtained at a median of 8 days (range, 7 to 19 days) in the PCZ-susp group and 7 days (range, 7 to 12 days) in the PCZ-tab group. The median Css values in the PCZ-susp and PCZ-tab groups were 390 ng/ml (range, 51 to 1,870 ng/ml; mean, 463 ± 309 ng/ml) and 1,740 ng/ml (range, 662 to 3,350 ng/ml; mean, 1,740 ± 706 ng/ml), respectively (P < 0.0001). Figure 1 illustrates the Css distributions in the two groups. The percentages of patients achieving the target goal level of ≥700 ng/ml were 17% (n = 20) versus 97% (n = 32) in the two groups, respectively (P < 0.001). By univariate analysis, only poor nutritional status (category 3) adversely affected the PCZ concentrations (Table 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zac0081541780001.jpg

Box plot of PCZ serum concentrations by treatment group (P < 0.0001).

TABLE 2

Linear regression models of the relation between PCZ serum concentration and treatment group, age, body mass index, mucositis, diarrhea, vomiting, nutrition status, and acid suppression

CharacteristicPCZ concn effecta (SE)P
PCZ treatment group
    Tablet1,318 (85)<0.0001
    SuspensionRefb
Age3 (4)0.45
Gender (male)18 (113)0.88
BMIc of >30 kg/m268 (112)0.55
Mucositis−194 (146)0.19
Diarrhea−179 (140)0.20
Vomiting19 (169)0.91
Nutrition status
    Category 1Ref
    Category 2−183 (133)0.17
    Category 3−439 (181)0.02
Acid suppression
    Proton pump inhibitorRef
    H2 antagonist27 (118)0.82
    None−407 (321)0.21
aEffect, estimated mean difference.
bRef, reference.
cBMI, body mass index.

To assess the effect of concomitant PPI or H2A agents, we included an interaction term in the multivariate linear regression model to determine if there is an association and found it to be statistically significant (P = 0.001), which implies that the PCZ concentration was significantly different when it was stratified by the type of acid suppression (PPI or H2A) between the suspension and tablet groups. In particular, the mean PCZ concentration in the suspension group was lower in the PPI patients (403 ng/ml) than in the H2A patients (510 ng/ml), while the mean PCZ concentration in the tablet group was higher in the PPI patients (2,095 ng/ml) than in the H2A patients (1,617 ng/ml) (Fig. 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zac0081541780002.jpg

Linear regression model of PCZ concentrations stratified by acid suppression and treatment group. The PCZ concentration was significantly different when it was stratified by acid suppression (PPI or H2A) and treatment group (suspension or tablet) with a P value of 0.001 from the interaction term in the linear regression model. In particular, the median PCZ concentration in the suspension group was lower in PPI patients (330 ng/ml) than in H2A patients (410 ng/ml), while the median PCZ concentration in the tablet group was higher in PPI patients (2,190 ng/ml) than in H2A patients (1,470 ng/ml).

Toxicity and breakthrough infections.

Clinically significant hepatotoxicity occurred in only 1 patient in each group (both grade 2), and both were thought to be related to PCZ. The PCZ-susp patient had a Css of 390 ng/ml, and the PCZ-tab patient had a Css of 3,350 ng/ml, which was the highest concentration in the tablet patient group. Measurements of the QTc interval with ECG during therapy were available for 32 patients in the PCZ-susp group and for 12 patients in the PCZ-tab group. Of these, clinically significant (grade 2 or higher) prolongations were noted in 9% (n = 3) and 17% (n = 2) in the PCZ-susp and PCZ-tab groups, respectively (P = 0.6). While 1 patient in each group had grade 3 QTc prolongation, no grade 4 prolongation or arrhythmia was noted in any patients. The PCZ Css values were 231, 426, and 1,200 ng/ml in the three PCZ-susp patients with a prolonged QTc interval and were 2,090 and 2,190 ng/ml in the two PCZ-tab patients with a prolonged QTc interval.

Breakthrough fungal infections were documented in 7% (n = 8) and 3% (n = 1) in the PCZ-susp and PCZ-tab groups, respectively (P = 0.68). In the PCZ-susp group, breakthrough infections were classified as proven in 3 cases (2 patients with Candida glabrata and 1 patient with Alternaria species and concomitant galactomannan-positive BAL fluid), as probable in 1 patient, and as possible in 4 patients. The median PCZ Css for these 8 patients was 382 ng/ml (range, 190 to 741 ng/ml). The breakthrough infection in the patient in the PCZ-tab group was documented as possible. This patient had a CT scan showing a large pulmonary nodule, which was unresponsive to broad-spectrum antibiotics. His serum galactomannan and 1,3-β-d-glucan assays were both negative, and he also underwent bronchoalveolar lavage with negative cultures and galactomannan assay. His PCZ Css was 2,350 ng/ml.

DISCUSSION

In this study, 150 patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies undergoing inpatient chemotherapy and receiving PCZ as antifungal prophylaxis were included. Noting that the baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, in this report, we clearly show superior Css with the use of the delayed-release PCZ-tab compared to that with the PCZ-susp, likely due to better absorption and oral bioavailability of the tablets. The serum steady-state concentrations and the percentage of patients achieving the target therapeutic concentrations (≥700 ng/ml) were significantly higher in the PCZ-tab group. Notwithstanding the higher Css in PCZ-tab group, the toxicities did not appear different between the groups. This might be explained by the relatively smaller sample size in the PCZ-tab group and the lack of uniform ECG monitoring in all patients and needs to be evaluated further in a larger patient cohort. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest comparative clinical study to date evaluating the 2 oral formulations of PCZ. In the only other published report, Jung et al. (17) evaluated crossover in 12 leukemia patients from the PCZ suspension to the tablet form and found better PCZ exposure without significant toxicity with the PCZ-tab, similar to our data.

We assessed the interactions between the PCZ formulation and concomitant acid suppressant therapy and found significantly higher PCZ drug levels with the tablet formulation irrespective of the type of acid suppressant used. In line with other reports (8,11), our study suggests limited effects on bioavailability and drug-drug interactions with concomitant acid suppression and the PCZ-tab, most likely related to the enhanced delivery system of the PCZ-tab and the delayed-release formulation. This has very important clinical implications since stress ulcer prophylaxis is often considered in this clinical setting due to the gastrointestinal effects of cytotoxic agents and concomitant thrombocytopenia.

It may be noted that in the PCZ-susp cohort, the dosing range was 600 to 800 mg/day (200 mg three times daily or 400 mg twice daily). The 800-mg/day dose (higher than the FDA-approved prophylaxis dose) was institutionally implemented when the first 21 patients receiving 600 mg/day of PCZ suspension had subtherapeutic levels (median, 400 ng/ml; range, 100 to 860; mean, 377 ng/ml). The subsequent 97 patients all received 400 mg of PCZ-susp orally twice daily, resulting in a median Css of 390 ng/ml (range, 51 to 1,870; mean, 482 ng/ml). Despite the higher daily dose of PCZ-susp, our data show substantially inferior Css with PCZ-susp than with PCZ-tab, thus reiterating the importance of the formulation in achieving adequate drug levels.

Two patients included in the analysis had previously received the PCZ-susp and subsequently received the PCZ-tab. The first patient had a PCZ Css of 260 ng/ml when receiving the suspension formulation and their concentration increased to 1,070 ng/ml after switching to the tablets. The second patient increased from a PCZ Css of 567 ng/ml to a concentration of 1,980 ng/ml with the PCZ-tab.

In conclusion, in this retrospective analysis, the PCZ-tab formulation was associated with improved absorption, leading to better Css and a higher probability of achievement of therapeutic goals than with the suspension without significantly affecting toxicities and breakthrough infections. Also noted in our study was the finding that concomitant PPI use did not affect the absorption or Css of PCZ tablets. While additional studies in larger patient cohorts are needed to confirm our results, given that no prospective head-to-head comparative studies of these two formulations are available or likely to be performed in the near future, we conclude that the delayed-release tablet formulation seems to be the better option for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

S.W. acknowledges support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (grant U54GM104942).

We declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Merck & Co., Inc. 2012. Noxafil (posaconazole) package insert. Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ. [Google Scholar]
2. Krishna G, Abu Tarif M, Xuan F, Martinho M, Angulo D, Cornely OA. 2008. Pharmacokinetics of oral posaconazole in neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myeloplastic syndrome. Pharmacotherapy 28:1223–1232. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.10.1223. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Lebeaux D, Lanternier F, Elie C, Suarez F, Buzyn A, Viard JP, Bougnoux ME, Lecuit M, Jullien V, Lortholary O. 2009. Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole: a monocentric study with 54 adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5224–5229. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00939-09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. AbuTarif MA, Krishna G, Statkevich P. 2010. Population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Curr Med Res Opin 26:397–405. doi: 10.1185/03007990903485056. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Kohl V, Muller C, Cornely OA, Abduljalil K, Fuhr U, Vehreschild JJ, Scheid C, Hallek M, Rüping MJ. 2010. Factors influencing pharmacokinetics of prophylactic posaconazole in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:207–212. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01027-09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Courtney R, Wexler D, Radwanski E, Lim J, Laughlin M. 2004. Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol 57:218–222. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01977.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Ross AL, Slain D, Cumpston A, Bryant AM, Hamadani M, Craig M. 2012. Evaluation of an alternative posaconazole prophylaxis regimen in haematological malignancy patients receiving concomitant stress ulcer prophylaxis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 40:557–561. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.09.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Kraft WK, Chang PS, van Iersel ML, Waskin H, Krishna G, Kersemaekers WM. 2014. Posaconazole tablet pharmacokinetics: lack of effect of concomitant medications altering gastric pH and gastric motility in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4020–4025. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02448-13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Krishna G, Ma L, Martinho M, O'Mara E. 2012. Single-dose phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in new tablet and capsule formulations relative to oral suspension. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4196–4201. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00222-12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Krishna G, Ma L, Martinho M, Preston RA, O'Mara E. 2012. A new solid oral tablet formulation of posaconazole: a randomized clinical trial to investigate rising single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2725–2730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Duarte RF, López-Jiménez J, Cornely OA, Laverdiere M, Helfgott D, Haider S, Chandrasekar P, Langston A, Perfect J, Ma L, van Iersel ML, Connelly N, Kartsonis N, Waskin H. 2014. Phase 1b study of new posaconazole tablet for prevention of invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients with neutropenia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5758–5765. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03050-14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Courtney RS, Pai S, Laughlin M, Lim J, Batra V. 2003. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral posaconazole administered in single and multiple doses in healthy adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:2788-2895. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2788-2795.2003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Ashbee HR, Barnes RA, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Gorton R, Hope WW. 2014. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1162–1176. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt508. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Heinz WJ, Zirkel J, Kuhn A, Schirmer D, Lenker U, Keller D, Klinker H. 2011. Relevance of timing for determination of posaconazole plasma concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3621–3623. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00062-11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. National Cancer Institute. 2009. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), v4.0. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
16. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Muñoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 46:1813–1821. doi: 10.1086/588660. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Jung DS, Tverdek FP, Kontoyiannis DP. 2014. Switching from posaconazole suspension to tablets increases serum drug levels in leukemia patients without clinically relevant hepatotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6993–6995. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04035-14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)