Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012; 2012: 5–7.
Published online 2012 Nov 3.
PMCID: PMC3540522

Electronic Tools for Cognitive Support During Resident Handoffs: State of the Practice and Future Directions

Karen Dunn Lopez, PhD, MPH, RN,1 Vineet Arora, MD, MPP,2 Andrew Johnson, PhD,3 Andrew D. Boyd, MD,4 Gail M. Keenan, PhD, RN,1 and Diana Wilkie, PhD, RN, FAAN1

Abstract

In the years following reduced resident work hours, single resident accountability for patient care has disappeared and replaced by frequent care transitions and shared responsibility between residents as the necessary paradigm for delivery of care in acute care settings. With this change, there has been increasing patient acuity and complexity as well as increased cognitive demands for clinicians, potential for miscommunication at care transitions, and preventable errors. Importantly, forgetting to transmit needed information during handoffs is a major contribution to overall suboptimal care processes including: delays in diagnosis and treatment, task omissions, work redundancies and near misses. To address these quality and safety problems, electronic tools embedded in the electronic health record are beginning to emerge. These tools when designed to provide cognitive support for intradisciplinary sharing of care can play a role in reducing information overload, miscommunication, and omission of patient care tasks. Less common are electronic tools that are designed for interdisciplinary information sharing. These interdisciplinary tools have greater potential for decreasing system inefficiencies and improving the overall quality of care delivery than intra-disciplinary tools. This presentation will provide an overview of existing electronic handoff tools and the design implications for future tools.

Description

This presentation will provide an overview of resident handoff literature, key electronic tool design principles, and existing electronic tools for resident handoffs. Tool screen shots and demonstration of interactive prototypes for selected tools will be presented as data visualization examples. Strengths and weaknesses of the existing tools will be discussed. This will lead to substantive discussion of the need for additional information sharing interdisciplinary electronic tools.

We will also present work with which our multidisciplinary team of nurses, physicians, and computer scientists1 has been engaged to further develop an interface for interdisciplinary information sharing. This interface will include: patient care needs, goals, interventions provided, progress toward meeting goals, and tasks that need to be done in the next shift. The long term goal of this research is to provide a framework for the electronic health records (EHRs) that provides a highly useable platform for the integration of key patient data for all clinicians to complete their discipline specific work.

Outline of Presentation

  1. Overview of resident hand off research literature24
    1. Hand off definition and goals
    2. Information needs
    3. Error potential
  2. Overview of key design principles57
    1. Computer supported collaborative work tools
    2. Cooperative task management
    3. Human Computer Interface
    4. Data visualization
    5. Human factors
    6. User centered design
    7. Interoperability
  3. III. Review of existing electronic hand off tools
    1. Patient Hand-off Tool8,9
    2. UW cores10
    3. VA Physician Hand off Tool11
    4. SynopSIS12
    5. LPCH sign out13
  4. IV. Overall critique and best practices for electronic hand off tools
  5. IV. Future Directions
    1. Interdisciplinary information exchange 1418
    2. Common data elements_ENREF_9_ENREF_9
    3. Needed features
      1. Patient listing options
      2. Task Lists
      3. Flexibility

Educational Goals

  • The learner will describe problems in patient care quality associated with increased resident care transitions.
  • The learner will identify strengths and weaknesses in existing electronic tools for resident handoffs.
  • The learner will discuss the potential benefits of interdisciplinary electronic tools.
  • The learner will identify design strategies for design of future electronic hand-off tools.

Who should attend

Physicians

Nurses

Residency directors

Interface Designers

Chief Medical Informatics Officers

Chief Nursing Informatics Officers

Handoff domain experts

References

1. Keenan G, Yao Y, Wlikie D, Johnson A, Ansari R, Khokhar A. Describing, Contrasting and Visualizing End of Life Care in the 21st Century. National Institute for Nursing Research; 2011. [Google Scholar]
2. Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Massucci JL, et al. Residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2009;84:1775–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Vidyarthi AR, Auerbach AD, Wachter RM, Katz PP. The impact of duty hours on resident self reports of errors. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:205–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Arora V. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvment: a critical incident analysis. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Reiman R, Cooper A, Cronin D. About Face 3: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Indianapolis: Willey; 2007. [Google Scholar]
6. Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Berkely: New Riders; 2007. [Google Scholar]
7. Stead W, Lin H, editors. Computational technology for effective health care: immediate steps and strategic directions. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
8. Flanagan ME, Patterson ES, Frankel RM, Doebbeling BN. Evaluation of a physician informatics tool to improve patient handoffs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:509–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Van Eaton EG, McDonough K, Lober WB, Johnson EA, Pellegrini CA, Horvath KD. Safety of using a computerized rounding and sign-out system to reduce resident duty hours. Acad Med. 2010;85:1189–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Pellegrini CA. Organizing the transfer of patient care information: the development of a computerized resident sign-out system. Surgery. 2004;136:5–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Anderson J, Shroff D, Curtis A, et al. The Veterans Affairs shift change physician-to-physician handoff project. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:62–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Sarkar U, Carter JT, Omachi TA, et al. SynopSIS: integrating physician sign-out with the electronic medical record. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:336–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Bernstein JA, Imler DL, Sharek P, Longhurst CA. Improved physician work flow after integrating sign-out notes into the electronic medical record. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:72–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Dunn Lopez K, Keenan G, editors. Current Issues in Nursing. 8th Edition. St. Louis: Elsivier Health Sciences; 2010. 2010. Beyond Collaboration: Work Relationships Between Nurses and Physicians. [Google Scholar]
15. Keenan G, Yakel E. Promoting Safe Nursing Care by Bringing Visibility to the Disciplinary Aspects of Interdisciplinary Care. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2005. pp. 385–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Collins SA, Mamykina L, Jordan D, et al. In search of common ground in handoff documentation in an Intensive Care Unit. J Biomed Inform. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Collins SA, Stein DM, Vawdrey DK, Stetson PD, Bakken S. Content overlap in nurse and physician handoff artifacts and the potential role of electronic health records: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:704–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Sidlow R, Katz-Sidlow RJ. Using a computerized sign-out system to improve physician-nurse communication. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:32–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association