Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Tex Heart Inst J. 1986 Jun; 13(2): 247–251.
PMCID: PMC324635
PMID: 15227369

In Vivo Survival of Red Blood Cells Processed by a Bubble or Membrane Oxygenator During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

Abstract

A dual radioisotope labeling technique was utilized to assess red cell survival differences between cells processed by either a bubble oxygenator (eight patients) or membrane oxygenator (eight patients) in 16 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Cells processed by a bubble oxygenator consistently had a shortened survival. The 30-minute recovery of cells was not significantly different between oxygenators in contradiction to some previous studies using plasma hemoglobin as an indicator of hemolysis. The results of this investigation confirm previous studies that a membrane oxygenator provides a survival advantage to red cells during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (552K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Peirce EC., 2nd The membrane versus bubble oxygenator controversy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1980 Jun;29(6):497–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clark RE, Beauchamp RA, Magrath RA, Brooks JD, Ferguson TB, Weldon CS. Comparison of bubble and membrane oxygenators in short and long perfusions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Nov;78(5):655–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fenchel G, Seybold-Epting W, Schmidt K, Stunkat R, Hoffmeister HE. Clinical comparison between membrane and bubble oxygenators in cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1979 Jul-Aug;20(4):419–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hicks GL, Zwart HH, DeWall RA. Membrane vs bubble oxygenators: a prospective study of 52 patients. Arch Surg. 1979 Nov;114(11):1285–1287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hessel EA, 2nd, Johnson DD, Ivey TD, Miller DW., Jr Membrane versus bubble oxygenator for cardiac operations. A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Jul;80(1):111–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sade RM, Bartles DM, Dearing JP, Campbell LJ, Loadholt CB. A prospective randomized study of membrane versus bubble oxygenators in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 1980 Jun;29(6):502–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tabak C, Eugene J, Stemmer EA. Erythrocyte survival following extracorporeal circulation. A question of membrane versus bubble oxygenator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981 Jan;81(1):30–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • van den Dungen JJ, Karliczek GF, Brenken U, Homan van der Heide JN, Wildevuur CR. Clinical study of blood trauma during perfusion with membrane and bubble oxygenators. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Jan;83(1):108–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boers M, van den Dungen JJ, Karliczek GF, Brenken U, van der Heide JN, Wildevuur CR. Two membrane oxygenators and a bubbler: a clinical comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983 Apr;35(4):455–462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ansell J, Parrilla N, King M, Fournier L, Szymanski I, Doherty P, Vander Salm T, Cutler B. Survival of autotransfused red blood cells recovered from the surgical field during cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Sep;84(3):387–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute