Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15; 105(2): 600–604.
Published online 2008 Jan 10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711063105
PMCID: PMC2206582
PMID: 18187577

Isotopic evidence for omnivory among European cave bears: Late Pleistocene Ursus spelaeus from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania

Michael P. Richards,*† Martina Pacher,‡ Mathias Stiller,§ Jérôme Quilès, Michael Hofreiter,§ Silviu Constantin,‖ João Zilhão,** and Erik Trinkaus††‡‡
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Previous bone collagen carbon and nitrogen isotopic studies of Late Pleistocene European cave bears (Ursus spelaeus) have shown that these bears frequently had low nitrogen isotope values, similar to those of herbivores and indicating either unusual physiology related to hibernation or a herbivorous diet. Isotopic analysis of animal bone from the Peştera cu Oase (Cave with Bones), Romania, shows that most of its cave bears had higher nitrogen isotope values than the associated herbivores and were, therefore, omnivorous. The Oase bears are securely identified as cave bears by both their morphology and DNA sequences. Although many cave bear populations may have behaved like herbivores, the Oase isotopic data demonstrate that cave bears were capable of altering their diets to become omnivores or even carnivores. These data therefore broaden the dietary profile of U. spelaeus and raise questions about the nature of the carnivore guild in Pleistocene Europe.

Keywords: carbon isotopes, nitrogen isotopes, diets, ancient DNA

Late Pleistocene cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) diet and physiology is not well known, although based on skull, mandible, and tooth morphology, they have been inferred to have been largely herbivorous (1–4). Moreover, isotopic studies of central and western European cave bears have shown that, in most cases where their values are compared with herbivores and carnivores from the same site, they have δ15N values that plot with, or lower than, herbivores (Table 1). These dietary inferences are in the context of bears that had a period of dormancy, similar to modern black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos), given the abundance of hibernation nests in European caves. This pattern has been interpreted in several ways.

Table 1.

Previously determined isotope values of European cave bears, with the mean ± SD for N > 2

SiteRegionδ13Cδ13C rangeδ15Nδ15N rangeNAge, cal ka*Ref
LiñaresNW Spain−21.1 ± 0.3−21.7 to −20.63.0 ± 0.42.1–3.620405
EirósNW Spain−21.1 ± 0.3−21.3 to −20.45.1 ± 0.34.4–5.58296
AldèneS France−20.8 ± 0.4−21.3 to −20.53.1 ± 1.52.1–4.83<307
MialetS France−20.2 ± 0.4−20.7 to −19.62.8 ± 1.60.8–4.45—7
OlaskoaPyrenees−20.5−20.52.72.71127
ChauvetS France−20.5 ± 0.3−21.2 to −20.13.8 ± 0.93.1–4.81627.3–42.18
Scladina-1ABelgium−22.1 ± 0.2−22.5 to −21.84.9 ± 1.23.0–6.17449
Scladina-4Belgium−23.2 ± 0.3−23.6 to −23.03.6 ± 0.63.0–4.54120–13010
Divje BabeSlovenia−20.5 ± 0.4−19.9 to −21.01.9 ± 0.70.6–3.3115211
RameschAustria−22.5−22.52.42.4145–4812
HerdengelAustria−22.0, −22.1−22.1 to −22.02.3, 2.52.3–2.5241.4–43.812
SchwabenreithAustria−22.9−22.92.52.5155–12112
LiegllochAustria−20.1, −20.2−20.2 to −20.12.8, 4.12.8–4.1230–4012
HartelsgrabenAustria−20.8, −21.0−21.0 to −20.80.8, 3.40.8–3.4232–4712
ConturinesItaly−22.3 ± 0.9−23.3 to −21.62.0 ± 0.51.6–2.5345.3–51.312
Potočka ZijalkaSlovenia−20.4−20.44.24.213512
VindijaCroatia−20.7, −21.1−21.1 to −20.71.3, 1.51.3–1.52>3413
Muierii†Romania20.4 ± 0.2−20.7 to −20.25.1 ± 1.63.4–7.3444–53
Cioclovina†Romania−20.3, −20.4−20.3 to −20.43.1, 4.33.1–4.3236, 45
VariousEurope−21.5 ± 0.5−22.0 to −20.68.4 ± 0.57.7–9.110—14‡

All isotope data are from bone samples derived from mature individuals; data from teeth and immature individuals are not included here or in Fig. 3. The individual values are provided in SI Table 3.

*Radiocarbon ages were converted to calendar years by using CalPal (www.calpal.de).

†The Muierii and Cioclovina data are from OxA in the context of radiocarbon dating (15, 16).

‡The individual various European specimens are from Hilderbrand et al. (14) and were provided by Hilderbrand (personal commmunication).

Based on comparisons of cave bear δ15N values to herbivore values from three Late Pleistocene sites in France and to modern bear isotope data, Bocherens et al. (7) concluded that the cave bears were herbivores. They ruled out the possibility that hibernation had an effect on δ15N values of modern bears, and by inference, it should not have affected cave bear δ15N values.

Fernández et al. (12) analyzed δ13C and δ15N data from central and western European cave bears and hypothesized that the δ15N values could be linked to climate. They found a link between δ15N values and temperature, with cave bears from colder environments having lower δ15N values. Although there are connections between climate and plant δ15N values (17) that show that colder environments often have lower δ15N values, they argued instead that the lower δ15N values observed in Alpine cave bears were linked to hibernation. They argued that, because dormancy may result in lower cave bear δ15N values, following Nelson et al. (11), colder environments require periods of longer dormancy that results in lower δ15N values.

An alternative possibility (18) is that they had a dietary preference for nitrogen-fixing plants, which have lower δ15N values. Such a diet might result in the very low δ15N values seen in some cave bear samples (Table 1). However, there are dietary constraints in terms of potential protein intake, feeding rates, and digestibility of plant matter for at least modern brown bears (19–21), suggesting that a dependence on such plants does not fully explain the cave bear δ15N pattern.

A fourth possibility, proposed by Hilderbrand et al. (14, 22) on the basis of higher δ15N values from a diverse sample of cave bears (Table 1), is that some cave bears were largely herbivorous, as are some modern bears, but that other cave bears were more carnivorous and hence exhibit δ15N values similar to those of many modern omnivorous U. arctos and U. americanus. In this interpretation, the variation in trophic level indicated by δ15N values would reflect ecological plasticity among U. spelaeus, in which they were more or less carnivorous depending on available food resources, body-size requirements, interspecific competition, seasonality, and temperature.

Regardless of the cause, 86.1% of the available individual European adult cave bear δ15N values (n = 101) are <6.0‰, and hence within the basically vegetarian range [the number rises to 95.6%, n = 91 without Hilderbrand et al.'s (14) 10 specimens] (Table 1). In the context of this distribution of δ15N values, routine isotopic assessment of a cave bear metapodial associated with an early modern human cranium in the Late Pleistocene Peştera cu Oase, Caraş-Severin, southwestern Romania (23–27) [supporting information (SI) Text and SI Figs. 4 and 5], provided an anomalously high δ15N value of 7.8‰ (SI Table 2, Oase O34-232). To further evaluate this result and address the cause of the generally low cave bear δ15N values, we measured the isotope values of cave bears and associated fauna from the Peştera cu Oase.

Affinities of the Peştera cu Oase Ursid Remains.

Because the primary concern of isotope analysis of Late Pleistocene U. spelaeus remains relates to the persistently low δ15N values obtained for them, in contrast to the variable but generally higher (more omnivorous) values generally found for U. arctos (7, 28–30), it is essential to establish the taxonomic affinities of the bear bones from the Peştera cu Oase.

Morphological Affinities.

A series of morphological contrasts between cave and brown bears are well established (31–34). These include, for U. spelaeus, broad molars with heavily wrinkled surfaces and additional cusps, loss of the first three premolars, pronounced doming of the forehead (especially in large males) (Fig. 1), large masseteric fossae and sagittal crests, large temporomandibular articulations, more robust long bones and metapodials, shorter extremities, pronounced tibial torsion, medial humeral curvature, and aspects of pedal facet morphology. All of these characteristics are found in all of the diagnostic bear remains from the Peştera cu Oase, and their morphology shows no distinctive differences from other cave bear samples that cannot be easily accommodated within models of normal, intraspecific temporal and spatial variation (25). There are no U. arctos in the sample.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is zpq0010889290001.jpg

Left anterolateral views of Peştera cu Oase adult U. spelaeus crania. From top to bottom, N32.1 (female), O34.62b (female), N32.21 (male), and N37.49 (male). The protuberance on the N32.21 dorsal neurocranium is a stalagmite.

Genetic Affinities.

To provide additional confirmation of the morphological evidence, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was extracted, amplified, and sequenced from 19 ursid samples (SI Table 2). All 19 individual sequences of the Peştera cu Oase ursids show clear affinity to central European cave bear sequences (35) rather than to brown bears. They do not form a monophyletic group within cave bear mtDNA variation, and the range of the Oase bear haplotypes is spread throughout most of the variability known for central European cave bear populations from southern Germany, Austria, Croatia, and Slovakia (35–37).

Stable Isotopes of the Peştera cu Oase U. spelaeus Remains.

The Peştera cu Oase faunal isotope data are in Fig. 2 and SI Table 2. The herbivores (Capra ibex and Cervus elaphus) have values similar to those observed elsewhere for herbivores in Pleistocene Europe (38–40), with δ15N values ranging between 2.2‰ and 5.4‰. The higher Canis lupus δ15N values are similar to those for European carnivores (9, 10, 41, 42). Whereas the wolf and deer remains come from the same time period as the bears, the ibex remains are more recent. There is fluctuation in faunal δ15N values over the past 50,000 years (38), and it is not necessarily valid to compare fauna from different time periods. The variation observed in European fauna occurs principally at ≈13 thousand years before the present (ka BP) and in the Holocene, where herbivores have reduced δ15N values; this may have affected the ibex scapula but probably not the other samples.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is zpq0010889290002.jpg

Isotope data for cave bears and other fauna from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania. Filled diamonds, U. spelaeus; open squares, C. lupus; filled triangles, C. elaphus; open triangles, C. ibex. S-EVA values are used except for the specimens for which only OxA data are available.

The Oase cave bear isotope data (Fig. 2 and SI Table 2) are shifted negatively in δ13C values (-21.5 ± 0.4‰, n = 21), but in this they match the values of most of the other European cave bear samples (Table 1 and SI Table 3). However, the Oase bear δ15N values are principally between the relatively “carnivorous” values of 5.7–9.8‰, with one “herbivorous” value of 3.6‰ (7.8 ± 1.4‰, n = 21; 8.0 ± 1.1‰, n = 20 without the one low value). A Wilcoxon nonparametric comparison of the pooled herbivore versus cave bear δ15N values for the Oase sample provides a P < 0.001 (P = 0.001 if the more recent ibex scapula is deleted from the sample); P = 0.036 between the Oase bears and more carnivorous wolf δ15N values. These cave bear isotopic values cannot be the product of diagenesis, because the other fauna, including the contemporaneous canid and cervid remains, have expected δ15N values, and all have expected C/N values.

These Oase bear data contrast strongly with all previously published cases of cave bear δ15N values associated with herbivore data from the same site, in which the cave bears have δ15N values that are similar to, or lower than, herbivores from the same site. Most of the unpublished specimens from the Romanian sites of Cioclovina and Muierii (15–16) follow the same pattern (Table 1 and SI Table 3), although two specimens (Muierii 05-6 and 05-11) have δ15N values of 6.0‰ and 7.3‰, and three specimens from Scladina 1A [δ15N of 5.7‰, 6.0‰, and 6.1‰ (9)] are close (Fig. 3). The museum-derived cave bear sample analyzed by Hilderbrand et al. (14) produced δ15N values similar to the Oase ones, although that may be due in part to selection for large (“museum quality”) specimens (22) because the degree of carnivory (and hence δ15N values) tends to correlate with size, at least among North American brown bears (29).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is zpq0010889290003.jpg

Distributions of δ15N values for U. spelaeus remains from European OIS 4–2 Late Pleistocene sites (Table 1) and the Peştera cu Oase (SI Table 2). Samples: Liñares (1), Eirós (2), southern France and Pyrenees (3), Chauvet (4), Scladina 1A (5), Divje Babe (6), eastern Alps (7), Muierii and Cioclovina (8), European (9), and Oase (10).

There is a modest inverse relationship between δ13C and δ15N values in the Oase cave bears (r = −0.708, P < 0.001; without the one low outlier, r = −0.554, P = 0.011). This pattern is occasionally observed in isotopic studies, and it is often interpreted as a mixing line between two food sources (43). In this case, it would indicate that the cave bears had two distinct dietary protein sources, one being plant foods and the other being animals with low δ13C and high δ15N values. None of the Oase herbivore species could be the main source of animal protein for the cave bears, because the δ13C values are too different (there is almost no shift in δ13C value between prey and consumer). Whatever the source of the animal protein, it is apparent from the Oase cave bear isotope data that U. spelaeus, as with U. arctos, was not strictly vegetarian.

Discussion

The Peştera cu Oase isotopic results indicate that cave bears do not always have low δ15N values when compared with herbivores from the same site. Moreover, this pattern is evident, although less dominant, in samples from Muierii and Scladina 1A. Therefore, cave bears had the ability to consume animal protein and behaved like omnivores or even carnivores, even if in many cases they were herbivorous.

This inferred dietary flexibility for cave bears is evident in the stable isotope values within some samples, including Oase, Muierii, and Scladina 1A, as well as between samples. In this variation U. spelaeus closely parallels the range of isotopic values seen for modern European and North American brown bears (5, 7, 28–30) and the few data available for Late Pleistocene brown bears (10, 42).

As a consequence of these δ15N values, the dietary ecology of modern, higher-latitude bears (excluding polar bears) is relevant for that of cave bears, especially the North American brown bears (U. arctos, including the Kodiak and grizzly bears) given their high-latitude range, body-size variation, occupation of regions with less human ecological impact than most of Eurasia, and extensive database. Brown bear diets range from almost completely vegetarian, including ones with substantial amounts of fruit/berries, to ones containing a substantial amount of fish and/or ungulate meat (19–21, 29, 30, 44, 45). All aspects of their omnivorous diets have limitations in availability, potential feeding rates, and nutritional value in any given environment; adequate weight gain for survival, reproduction, and hibernation therefore depends on a mix of as many food resources as are available (19, 21). Meat consumption, in particular, varies widely among and within brown bear populations, due, among nonmaritime bears, to the availability of ungulate fauna (29, 30, 44, 45). Large adult males also appear to be more carnivorous than females or subadult bears (28, 29). North American black bears (U. americanus) appear to have similar plant/meat dietary proportions as brown bears (29), except that the larger brown bears are frequently more carnivorous when the prime meat is maritime (e.g., salmon) (46). This ecological flexibility of modern brown bears therefore makes an appropriate model to understand the range of isotopic values now available for European cave bears, both within and between site-specific samples.

The Oase bear isotope data also indicate that there is no need to invoke special species-wide effects, such as a dormancy effect or a reliance on specific plant foods, to explain the frequently low δ15N for European Late Pleistocene cave bears.

These isotopic data also imply that U. spelaeus participated, at least occasionally, in the European Late Pleistocene carnivore guild. This would have brought it into competition with the purer carnivores, especially cave lions and hyenas, as well as the more omnivorous ones such as brown bears and wolves. A very large bear obtaining much of its protein from vertebrate prey would have a serious effect on the dynamics of that guild. Moreover, contemporaneous European humans, both late archaic and early modern, consistently exhibit high δ15N values (13, 47, 48), and an additional large-bodied carnivore would have further intensified any human–carnivore interactions within the ecosystem.

Conclusions

Isotopic analysis of the Late Pleistocene cave bears from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania demonstrates that at least this bear population had omnivorous dietary adaptations. This is in contrast to most of the other published cave bear isotope data, which have been taken to show that they were herbivorous. The Oase data confirm that cave bears, as with modern brown bears, were omnivorous, although they may have frequently had dietary regimes that were primarily herbivorous. In an ecological context containing an abundance of large social carnivores, such as Late Pleistocene Europe, bears would have needed the dietary flexibility that is emerging from these stable isotope data. The U. spelaeus stable isotope data from the Peştera cu Oase, in conjunction with the data for cave bears elsewhere in Europe, now permit us to view them in a broader dietary framework and thereby raise questions as to their roles within the ecosystems of Pleistocene Europe.

Materials and Methods

The Peştera cu Oase Ursid Sample.

The overall assessment of the Peştera cu Oase ursid sample is based principally on those remains excavated from the Panta Strǎmoşilor, supplemented by surface materials in the other galleries of the Peştera cu Oase (see SI Text, SI Fig. 4 and 5). For isotopic and ancient DNA analysis, 22 ursid, and 10 other large mammals remains were selected from both the excavated and surface remains (see SI Table 2). Fifteen of the bear bones derive from excavations in the Panta Strǎmoşilor, whereas the others come from the surfaces of the adjacent galleries, some from hibernation nests. Other faunal species are rare within the Peştera cu Oase; sufficiently preserved bones for isotopic analysis include wolf (n = 4), ibex (n = 4), and red deer (n = 2). All of the specimens are bone and derive from fully mature individuals.

Given the mixed nature of the skeletal remains, there may be some duplication of individuals within species. The bear mtDNA haplotypes provide a minimum number of individuals of eight. The radiocarbon ages for the ibex provide a minimum of three individuals. The cervid hemimandibles, however, are right and left specimens, morphologically similar, may represent the same individual, and have similar isotopic values and radiocarbon ages; they are nonetheless plotted separately.

Morphological Assessment.

The faunal remains from the Peştera cu Oase were determined to skeletal element and species based on morphological characteristics. Apart from a few fragments, morphological and morphometric species identification was readily apparent for the >5,000 bear remains excavated in the Panta Strǎmoşilor and collected from the cave surfaces.

Sample Collection.

The analytical samples were derived from mature bone diaphyseal, rib, palatal, and basal mandibular cortical bone and removed by using a stainless-steel blade on a Dremel tool.

Ancient DNA.

Ancient DNA was extracted from 170 to 750 mg of bone material as described in Hofreiter et al. (36) and Rohland and Hofreiter (49, 50). Two hundred eight-five base pairs (bp) of the mitochondrial control region were amplified by using regular PCR with primers and amplification conditions from Hofreiter et al. (35) or under multiplex PCR conditions as described by Rompler et al. (51) by using primers from Hofreiter et al. (35, 36). Amplification products were cloned by using the TOPO-TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) by following supplier recommendations. Four to eight clones of each amplification product were sequenced on an ABI 3730 by using the BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing kit and M13 universal primers. Clone sequences were aligned by using BioEdit (52) and merged to reconstruct the complete 285-bp sequence for each individual. Every sequence position was determined from clone sequences derived from at least two primary amplification products to avoid errors caused by ancient DNA template damage (53, 54). In cases of consistent differences among clones derived from independent amplification products, a third primary amplification was used to clarify the correct state for each position.

Stable Isotopes.

The key assumption behind the analysis of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes is that bone collagen is formed throughout a mammal's life, and the carbon and nitrogen in collagen is ultimately derived from dietary protein (55–57). The isotope ratios of the two stable isotopes of carbon (13C/12C or δ13C) and nitrogen (15N/14N or δ15N) in dietary protein are commonly well preserved in European Late Pleistocene mammal bone collagen. Therefore, measurement of the δ13C and δ15N values of mammal bone collagen can be used to determine the main sources of dietary protein over the lifetime of that mammal. The bone collagen isotope values likely reflect dietary protein consumed over the past 10–20 years of life for an adult long-lived mammal (58). Although used to assess whether the dietary protein carbon is derived from marine versus terrestrial sources or from C3 or C4 plants, it is the trophic level of the protein consumed that is of interest here. Because the δ15N of bone collagen is ≈2‰ to ≈4‰ higher than dietary protein (59, 60), one can use it to determine the main protein sources in the diets of cave bears, especially compared with other fauna from the same site, to see whether dietary protein derived mainly from plants, as indicated by other isotopic studies of cave bears, or from higher trophic level protein sources. Of particular relevance here, experimental work with living bears (14) has shown that bone collagen δ15N values are an accurate reflection of diet.

A potential source of error for paleontological samples is postdepositional collagen bacterial and/or chemical diagenesis. Bone samples were therefore pretreated to remove exogenous carbon and isolate the original collagen. The resulting collagen extract is measured for a number of collagen quality indicators, including collagen yield, C/N ratio, percent C, and percent N in the collagen extract (61, 62).

We extracted collagen from 26 mammalian bones from the Oase site using standard extraction procedures [i.e., modified Longin (63) method (64) with the addition of an ultrafiltration step (65)]. Isotope measurements were made by using a ThermoFinnigan elemental analyzer coupled to a Delta Plus XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. Carbon isotope ratio measurements (δ13C) were made relative to the vPDB standard, and the nitrogen isotope ratio measurements (δ15N) were made relative to the AIR standard. All samples were measured in duplicate, and the errors (1σ) are better than ±0.2‰.

Additional isotopic data produced at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU) during sample pretreatment for radiocarbon dating were included for 12 specimens. The ORAU extraction procedures are similar to those that we used, including ultrafiltration [Brown et al. (65)]. All of the data reported here have C/N ratios that are within the accepted range of 2.9–3.6 (61).

In addition, 15 of the same specimens were AMS radiocarbon dated, principally by ORAU (OxA); two specimens were dated by the University of Vienna laboratory (VERA), one by using ultrafiltration and the other of an intact molar, which experience has shown provides results similar to bone dates run with ultrafiltration.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information:

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.

Fieldwork at the Peştera cu Oase was undertaken through the Institutul de Speologie “Emil Racovitǎ,” Academia Românǎ; with the permission of the Direcţia Monumente Istorice Si Muzee, Ministerul Culturii si Cultelor (authorizations 181/2004 and 47/2005) and supported by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-0409194, Wenner–Gren Foundation Grant 7111, Washington University, the Leakey Foundation, the Instituto Português de Arqueologia, the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Romanian National Council for Academic Research Grant CNCSIS 1258/2005), and Romanian Ministry for Education and Research Grant CEEX 627/2005). The fieldwork was made possible through the efforts of the Pro Acva Grup (Ş. Milota, M. Gherase, and L. Sarcinǎ) and O. Moldovan. G. V. Hilderbrand provided their original cave bear isotopic data. The Max Planck Society funded the isotopic and aDNA research. To all we are grateful.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. EU289394–EU289402).

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0711063105/DC1.

References

1. Kurtén B. The Cave Bear Story. New York: Columbia Univ Press; 1976. [Google Scholar]
2. Mattson DJ. Diet and morphology of extant and recently extinct northern bears. Ursus. 1998;10:479–496. [Google Scholar]
3. Rabeder G, Nagel D, Pacher M. Der Höhlenbär. Stuttgart: Thorbecke; 2000. [Google Scholar]
4. Grandal A, López F. Sexual dimorphism and autogenetic variation in the skull of the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus Rosenmüller) of the European Upper Pleistocene. Geobios. 2005;38:325–338. [Google Scholar]
5. Vila M, Fernández D, López F, Grandal A, Vidal JR. Paleoecological implications inferred from stable isotopic signatures (δ13C, δ15N) in bone collagen of Ursus spelaeus ROS.-HEIN. Cab Lab Xeol Laxe. 1999;24:73–87. [Google Scholar]
6. Fernández D. Biogeoquímica isotópica (δ13C, δ15N) del Ursus Spelaeus del yacimiento de Cova Eirós, Lugo. Cab Lab Xeol Laxe. 1998;23:237–249. [Google Scholar]
7. Bocherens H, Fizet M, Mariotti A. Diet, physiology and ecology of fossil mammals as inferred from stable carbon and nitrogen isotope biogeochemistry: Implications for Pleistocene bears. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1994;107:213–225. [Google Scholar]
8. Bocherens H, Drucker DE, Billiou D, Geneste JM, van der Plicht J. Bears and humans in Chauvet Cave (Vallon-Pont-d'Arc, Ardèche, France): Insights from stable isotopes and radiocarbon dating of bone collagen. J Hum Evol. 2006;50:370–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Bocherens H, et al. Paleobiological implications of the isotopic signatures (13C, 15N) of the fossil mammal collagen in Scladina cave (Sclayn, Belgium). Quatern Res. 1997;48:370–380. [Google Scholar]
10. Bocherens H, Billiou D, Mariotti A. Palaeoenvironmental and palaeodietary implications of isotopic biogeochemistry of Last Interglacial Neanderthal and mammal bones in Scladina Cave (Belgium). J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26:599–607. [Google Scholar]
11. Nelson DE, Angerbjörn A, Liden K, Turk I. Stable isotopes and the metabolism of the European cave bear. Oecologia. 1998;116:177–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Fernández D, Vila M, Grandal A. Stable isotopes data (delta 13C, delta 15N) from the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus): A new approach to its palaeoenvironment and dormancy. Proc R Soc Biol Sci. 2001;268B:1159–1164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Richards MP, et al. Neanderthal diet at Vindija and Neanderthal predation: The evidence from stable isotopes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7663–7666. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Hilderbrand GV, et al. Use of stable isotopes to determine diets of living and extinct bears. Can J Zool. 1996;74:2080–2088. [Google Scholar]
15. Soficaru A, Doboş A, Trinkaus E. Early modern humans from the Peştera Muierii, Baia de Fier, Romania. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17196–17201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Soficaru A, Petrea C, Doboş A, Trinkaus E. The human cranium from the Peştera Cioclovina Uscatǎ, Romania: Context, age, taphonomy, morphology and paleopathology. Curr Anthropol. 2007;48:611–619. [Google Scholar]
17. Amundson R, et al. Global patterns of the isotopic composition of soil and plant nitrogen. Global Biogeochem Cyc. 2003;17:10311–10318. [Google Scholar]
18. Vila M, Fernández D, Grandal A. Cave bear's diet: A new hypothesis based on stable isotopes. Cab Lab Xeol Laxe. 2001;26:431–439. [Google Scholar]
19. Rode KD, Robbins CT. Why bears consume mixed diets during fruit abundance. Can J Zool. 2000;78:1640–1645. [Google Scholar]
20. Welch CA, Keay J, Kendall KC, Robbins CT. Constraints on frugivory by bears. Ecology. 1997;78:1105–1119. [Google Scholar]
21. Rode KD, Robbins CT, Shipley LA. Constraints on herbivory by grizzly bears. Oecologia. 2001;128:62–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Hilderbrand GV, Robbins CT, Farley SD. Response: Use of stable isotopes to determine diets of living and extinct bears. Can J Zool. 1998;76:2301–2303. [Google Scholar]
23. Trinkaus E, et al. An early modern human from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:11231–11236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Trinkaus E, Milotaş, Rodrigo R, Gherase M, Moldovan O. Early modern human cranial remains from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania. J Hum Evol. 2003;45:245–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Quilès J, et al. Cave bears (Ursus spelaeus) from the Peştera cu Oase (Banat, Romania): Paleobiology and taphonomy. Comptes Rendus Palévol. 2006;5:927–934. [Google Scholar]
26. Rougier H, et al. Peştera cu Oase 2 and the cranial morphology of early modern Europeans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:1164–1170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Zilhão J, et al. In: Rethinking the Human Revolution. Mellars P, Boyle K, Bar-Yosef O, Stringer C, editors. Cambridge UK: McDonald Institute; 2007. pp. 249–262. [Google Scholar]
28. Hilderbrand GV, et al. The importance of meat, particularly salmon, to body size, population productivity, and conservation of North American brown bears. Can J Zool. 1999;77:132–138. [Google Scholar]
29. Jacoby ME, et al. Trophic relations of brown and black bears in several western North American ecosystems. J Wildlife Manag. 1999;63:921–929. [Google Scholar]
30. Mowat G, Heard DC. Major components of grizzly bear diet across North America. Can J Zool. 2006;84:473–489. [Google Scholar]
31. Altuna J. Hallazgos de Oso Pardo (Ursus arctos, Mammalia) en cuevas del País Vasco. Munibe. 1973;25:121–157. [Google Scholar]
32. Torres T, Quintero I, Gomez E, Mansilla H, Martinez C. Estudio comparativo de las mandibulas de Ursus spelaeus, Rosenmüller-Heinroth—Ursus deningeri, Von Reichenau y Ursus arctos, Linneo. Bol Geol Min. 1978;89–III:203–222. [Google Scholar]
33. Torres T. Osos (Mammalia, Carnivora, Ursidae) del Pleistoceno Ibérico (U. deningeri von Reichenau, U spelaeus Rösenmüller Heinroth y U arctos Linneo) Bol Geol Min. 1988;99:1–316. [Google Scholar]
34. Chagneau J. Contribution à l'étude des os des extremités des pattes d'Ursus deningeri romeviensis. Comparaison avec Ursus arctos et Ursus spelaeus. Bull Soc Anthropol Sud-Ouest. 1985;20:1–85. [Google Scholar]
35. Hofreiter M, et al. Ancient DNA analyses reveal high mitochondrial DNA sequence diversity and parallel morphological evolution of Late Pleistocene cave bears. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:1244–1250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Hofreiter M, et al. Evidence for reproductive isolation between cave bear populations. Curr Biol. 2004;14:40–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Hofreiter M, et al. Lack of phylogeography in European mammals before the last glaciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12963–12968. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Richards MP, Hedges REM. Bone collagen d13C and d15N values of fauna from northwest Europe reflect palaeoclimatic variation over the last 40,000 years. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2003;193:261–267. [Google Scholar]
39. Drucker D, Bocherens H, Bridault A, Billiou D. Carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of red deer (Cervus elaphus) collagen as a tool for tracking palaeoenvironmental change during late glacial and early Holocene in northern Jura (France). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2003;195:375–388. [Google Scholar]
40. Hedges REM, Stevens RE, Richards MP. Bone as a stable isotope archive for local climatic information. Quatern Sci Rev. 2004;23:959–965. [Google Scholar]
41. Ambrose SH. In: Neanderthals and Modern Humans in Western Asia. Akazawa T, Aoki K, Bar-Yosef O, editors. New York: Plenum; 1998. pp. 277–289. [Google Scholar]
42. Jacobi RM, Higham TFG, Bronk Ramsey C. AMS radiocarbon dating of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic bone in the British Isles: Improved reliability by using ultrafiltration. J Quatern Sci. 2006;21:557–573. [Google Scholar]
43. Schwarcz HP. Some theoretical aspects of isotope paleodiet studies. J Archaeol Sci. 1991;18:261–275. [Google Scholar]
44. Gau RJ, Case R, Penner DF, McLoughlin PD. Feeding patterns of barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian arctic. Arctic. 2002;56:339–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. MacHutchon AG, Wellwood DW. Grizzly bear food habits in the northern Yukon, Canada. Ursus. 2003;14:225–235. [Google Scholar]
46. Belant JL, Kielland K, Follmann EH, Adams LG. Interspecific resource partitioning in sympatric ursids. Ecol Appl. 2006;16:2333–2343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Richards MP, Pettitt PB, Stiner MC, Trinkaus E. Stable isotope evidence for increasing dietary breadth in the European mid-Upper Paleolithic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6528–6532. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Beauval C, Lacrampe-Cuyaubère F, Maureille B, Trinkaus E. Direct radiocarbon dating and stable isotopes of the Neandertal femur from Les Rochers-de-Villeneuve (Lussac-les-Châteaux, Vienne). Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris. 2006;18:35–42. [Google Scholar]
49. Rohland N, Hofreiter M. Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth. Nature Prot. 2007;2:1756–1762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Rohland N, Hofreiter M. Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction. Biotech. 2007;42:343–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Stiller M, et al. Multiplex amplification of ancient DNA. Nat Prot. 2006;1:720–728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Hall TA. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
53. Hofreiter M, Jaenicke V, Serre D, Haeseler A, Pääbo S. DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artifacts induced by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:4793–4799. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Stiller M, et al. Patterns of nucleotide misincorporations during enzymatic amplification and direct large-scale sequencing of ancient DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:13578–13584. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Sealy J. In: Handbook of Archaeological Sciences. Brothwell DR, Pollard AM, editors. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2001. pp. 269–279. [Google Scholar]
56. Katzenberg MA. In: The Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton. Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR, editors. New York: Wiley; 2000. pp. 305–327. [Google Scholar]
57. Ambrose SH, Norr L. In: Prehistoric Human Bone: Archaeology at the Molecular Level. Lambert J, Grupe G, editors. New York: Springer; 1993. pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
58. Wild EM, et al. 14C dating with the bomb peak: An application to forensic medicine. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res. 2000;172B:944–950. [Google Scholar]
59. Schoeninger M, DeNiro M. Nitrogen and carbon isotopic composition of bone collagen from marine and terrestrial animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1984;48:625–639. [Google Scholar]
60. Schwarcz H, Schoeninger M. Stable isotope analyses in human nutritional ecology. Yrbk Phys Anthropol. 1991;34:283–321. [Google Scholar]
61. DeNiro MJ. Post-mortem preservation and alteration of in vivo bone collagen isotope ratios in relation to paleodietary reconstruction. Nature. 1985;317:806–809. [Google Scholar]
62. Ambrose SH. Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. J Archaeol Sci. 1990;17:431–451. [Google Scholar]
63. Longin R. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature. 1971;230:241–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Richards MP, Hedges REM. Stable isotope evidence for similarities in the types of marine foods used by Late Mesolithic humans at sites along the Atlantic coast of Europe. J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26:717–722. [Google Scholar]
65. Brown TA, Nelson DE, Vogel JS, Southon JR. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon. 1988;30:171–177. [Google Scholar]
Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences