Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More.

Logo of gutGutVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Gut. 1999 May; 44(5): 608–614.
doi: 10.1136/gut.44.5.608
PMCID: PMC1727517
PMID: 10205194

The effects of glutamine on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in parenterally fed rats

N Mandir and R Goodlad
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Several papers have indicated that glutamine is a preferred fuel for the enterocyte and that it can increase intestinal epithelial cell proliferation.
AIMS—To investigate the effects of glutamine on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in the parenterally fed rat.
METHODS—Five groups of six rats were fed parenterally; a group of orally fed rats was also studied. Crypt cell proliferation was studied after six days using native mitoses in microdissected crypts and bromodeoxyuridine labelling.
RESULTS—No effect of treatment was seen on intestinal weight; however, the weights of the small intestine, caecum, and colon were all significantly heavier in the orally fed group than in the total parenteral nutrition groups (p<0.001). There was no effect of any of the glutamine treatments on mitotic activity in the small intestine. In the colon there was a small increase in native mitoses with glutamine (p=0.03). There was also an indication of increased proliferative activity in the first fifth of the small intestine and colon with glutamine. Little effect of glutamine on bromodeoxyuridine labelling in either site was observed, but there was a small but significant reduction in growth fraction of the colon of the glutamine treated group. The labelling distribution curve from sections and the mitotic distribution curve obtained from crypt squashes showed a good correlation.
CONCLUSION—Glutamine has a small, but significant effect on mitotic activity but only in the colon. Modest effects on the distribution of labelled cells were also seen.

Keywords: glutamine; parenteral nutrition; cell proliferation; intestine

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (119K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Goodlad RA, Wilson TJ, Lenton W, Gregory H, McCullagh KG, Wright NA. Intravenous but not intragastric urogastrone-EGF is trophic to the intestine of parenterally fed rats. Gut. 1987 May;28(5):573–582. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Buchman AL, Moukarzel AA, Bhuta S, Belle M, Ament ME, Eckhert CD, Hollander D, Gornbein J, Kopple JD, Vijayaroghavan SR. Parenteral nutrition is associated with intestinal morphologic and functional changes in humans. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995 Nov-Dec;19(6):453–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Roediger WE. Utilization of nutrients by isolated epithelial cells of the rat colon. Gastroenterology. 1982 Aug;83(2):424–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman MA, Grahn MF, Giamundo P, O'Connell PR, Onwu D, Hutton M, Maudsley J, Norton B, Rogers J, Williams NS. New technique to measure mucosal metabolism and its use to map substrate utilization in the healthy human large bowel. Br J Surg. 1993 Apr;80(4):445–449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Dwyer ST, Smith RJ, Hwang TL, Wilmore DW. Maintenance of small bowel mucosa with glutamine-enriched parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1989 Nov-Dec;13(6):579–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Newsholme E, Hardy G. Supplementation of diets with nutritional pharmaceuticals. Nutrition. 1997 Sep;13(9):837–839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haque SM, Chen K, Usui N, Iiboshi Y, Okuyama H, Masunari A, Cui L, Nezu R, Takagi Y, Okada A. Alanyl-glutamine dipeptide-supplemented parenteral nutrition improves intestinal metabolism and prevents increased permeability in rats. Ann Surg. 1996 Mar;223(3):334–341. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia-Arumi E, Schwartz S, Lopez-Hellin J, Arbos MA, Andreu AL, Farriol M. Addition of glutamine does not improve protein synthesis and jejunal mucosa morphology in non-hypercatabolic stress. Physiol Res. 1995;44(4):233–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klimberg VS, Souba WW, Dolson DJ, Salloum RM, Hautamaki RD, Plumley DA, Mendenhall WM, Bova FJ, Khan SR, Hackett RL, et al. Prophylactic glutamine protects the intestinal mucosa from radiation injury. Cancer. 1990 Jul 1;66(1):62–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yagi M, Sakamoto K, Hasebe K, Ito H, Onishi I, Tani T, Hashimoto T, Shimizu K, Miwa K. Effect of a glutamine-enriched diet on small bowel allograft during immunosuppressive therapy. Nutrition. 1997 Sep;13(9):778–782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Michail S, Mohammadpour H, Park JH, Vanderhoof JA. Effect of glutamine-supplemented elemental diet on mucosal adaptation following bowel resection in rats. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995 Nov;21(4):394–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderhoof JA, Blackwood DJ, Mohammadpour H, Park JH. Effects of oral supplementation of glutamine on small intestinal mucosal mass following resection. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992 Apr;11(2):223–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goodlad RA, Lee CY, Wright NA. Cell proliferation in the small intestine and colon of intravenously fed rats: effects of urogastrone-epidermal growth factor. Cell Prolif. 1992 Sep;25(5):393–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goodlad RA, Wilson TJ, Lenton W, Gregory H, McCullagh KG, Wright NA. Intravenous but not intragastric urogastrone-EGF is trophic to the intestine of parenterally fed rats. Gut. 1987 May;28(5):573–582. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chwalinski S, Potten CS, Evans G. Double labelling with bromodeoxyuridine and [3H]-thymidine of proliferative cells in small intestinal epithelium in steady state and after irradiation. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1988 Sep;21(5):317–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheppach W, Dusel G, Kuhn T, Loges C, Karch H, Bartram HP, Richter F, Christl SU, Kasper H. Effect of L-glutamine and n-butyrate on the restitution of rat colonic mucosa after acid induced injury. Gut. 1996 Jun;38(6):878–885. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spaeth G, Gottwald T, Haas W, Holmer M. Glutamine peptide does not improve gut barrier function and mucosal immunity in total parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993 Jul-Aug;17(4):317–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scolapio JS, Camilleri M, Fleming CR, Oenning LV, Burton DD, Sebo TJ, Batts KP, Kelly DG. Effect of growth hormone, glutamine, and diet on adaptation in short-bowel syndrome: a randomized, controlled study. Gastroenterology. 1997 Oct;113(4):1074–1081. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths RD. Outcome of critically ill patients after supplementation with glutamine. Nutrition. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(7-8):752–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Higashiguchi T, Hasselgren PO, Wagner K, Fischer JE. Effect of glutamine on protein synthesis in isolated intestinal epithelial cells. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993 Jul-Aug;17(4):307–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarac TP, Seydel AS, Ryan CK, Bessey PQ, Miller JH, Souba WW, Sax HC. Sequential alterations in gut mucosal amino acid and glucose transport after 70% small bowel resection. Surgery. 1996 Sep;120(3):503–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wirén ME, Permert J, Skullman SP, Wang F, Larsson J. No differences in mucosal adaptive growth one week after intestinal resection in rats given enteral glutamine supplementation or deprived of glutamine. Eur J Surg. 1996 Jun;162(6):489–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Savidge TC, Walker-Smith JA, Phillips AD. Novel insights into human intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in health and disease using confocal microscopy. Gut. 1995 Mar;36(3):369–374. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Figures and Tables

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is 98909.f1.jpg

The weights of the stomach (A), small intestine (B), caecum (C), and colon (D), expressed as a percentage of total body weight. ***p<0.001 versus TPN + alanine.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is 98909.f2.jpg

Native mitoses counts in crypt squash preparations in the small intestine and colon: (A) 50% small intestine; (B) 10% colon; (C) 50% colon; (D) 90% colon. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 versus TPN + alanine.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is 98909.f3.jpg

Data from sections reformatted to express the proportion of labelled cells within five equal zones of the crypt and the distribution of mitotic figures scored by superimposing a grid over the individual microdissected crypts for the small intestine. The top shows the mean number of labelled cells or mitoses per zone. The bottom shows the proportion of labelled cells or mitoses in the zones. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 versus TPN + alanine.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is 98909.f4.jpg

Data from sections reformatted to express the proportion of labelled cells within five equal zones of the crypt and the distribution of mitotic figures scored by superimposing a grid over the individual microdissected crypts for the colon. The top shows the mean number of labelled cells or mitoses per zone. The bottom shows the proportion of labelled cells or mitoses in the zones. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 versus TPN + alanine.

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group