nerve sparing - PMC

Result Filters

You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 34475

<< First< Prev

Page of 1724

Next >Last >>

Select item 107419341.

Functional Impact of Neuro-Vascular Bundle Preservation in High Risk Prostate Cancer without Compromising Oncological Outcomes: A Propensity-Modelled Analysis

Marc A. Furrer, Niranjan Sathianathen, Brigitta Gahl, Patrick Y. Wuethrich, Gianluca Giannarini, Niall M. Corcoran, George N. Thalmann

Cancers (Basel) 2023 Dec; 15(24): 5839. Published online 2023 Dec 14. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245839

PMCID:: PMC10741934

Article PDF–3.5M

Select item 71890832.

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the precision surgery for cervical cancer

Noriaki Sakuragi, Gen Murakami, Yosuke Konno, Masanori Kaneuchi, Hidemichi Watari

J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May; 31(3): e49. Published online 2020 Jan 21. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e49

PMCID:: PMC7189083

Article PDF–10M

Select item 89969223.

Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes

Iason Kyriazis, Theodoros Spinos, Arman Tsaturyan, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Jens Uwe Stolzenburg, Evangelos Liatsikos

Cancers (Basel) 2022 Apr; 14(7): 1601. Published online 2022 Mar 22. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071601

PMCID:: PMC8996922

Article PDF–2.6M

Select item 107957484.

Surgical Anatomy and Dissection of the Hypogastric Plexus in Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy

Stoyan Kostov, Yavor Kornovski, Angel Yordanov, Rafał Watrowski, Stanislav Slavchev, Yonka Ivanova, Tosho Ganev, Hakan Yalçın, Ilker Selçuk

Diagnostics (Basel) 2024 Jan; 14(1): 83. Published online 2023 Dec 29. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010083

PMCID:: PMC10795748

Article PDF–32M

Select item 63709175.

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa)

Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Apiwat Aue‐aungkul, Khadra Galaal, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon, Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro‐oncology and Orphan Cancer Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2019(2): CD012828. Published online 2019 Feb 12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012828.pub2

PMCID:: PMC6370917

Article PDF–575K

Select item 51610206.

Nerve-sparing techniques and results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu, Omer Aytac, Fatih Atug

Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Dec; 57(Suppl 2): S172–S184. Published online 2016 Dec 8. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.S2.S172

PMCID:: PMC5161020

Article PDF–19M

Select item 95572377.

Sural-sparing pattern: A study against electrodiagnostic subtypes of Guillain–Barre syndrome

Nath Pasutharnchat, Varis Ratanasirisawad, Manasawan Santananukarn, Chamaiporn Taychargumpoo, Jakkrit Amornvit, Chaipat Chunharas

Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2022; 7: 266–272. Published online 2022 Sep 21. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.09.001

PMCID:: PMC9557237

Article PDF–221K

Select item 53276358.

Direct Administration of Nerve-Specific Contrast to Improve Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

Connor W. Barth, Summer L. Gibbs

Theranostics. 2017; 7(3): 573–593. Published online 2017 Jan 7. doi: 10.7150/thno.17433

PMCID:: PMC5327635

Article PDF–3.7M

Select item 99315459.

Oncological and functional outcomes of organ‐preserving cystectomy versus standard radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Reece Clay, Raghav Shaunak, Siddarth Raj, Alexander Light, Sachin Malde, Ramesh Thurairaja, Oussama El‐Hage, Prokar Dasgupta, Muhammed Shamim Khan, Rajesh Nair

BJUI Compass. 2023 Mar; 4(2): 135–155. Published online 2022 Oct 3. doi: 10.1002/bco2.189

PMCID:: PMC9931545

Article PDF–1.6M

Select item 922024510.

Osteoarthritis-Induced Metabolic Alterations of Human Hip Chondrocytes

Annett Eitner, Simon Sparing, Felix C. Kohler, Sylvia Müller, Gunther O. Hofmann, Thomas Kamradt, Hans-Georg Schaible, Matthias Aurich

Biomedicines. 2022 Jun; 10(6): 1349. Published online 2022 Jun 8. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061349

PMCID:: PMC9220245

Article PDF–1.7M

Select item 1088548111.

Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peng Xiang, Zhen Du, Di Guan, Wei Yan, Mingdong Wang, Danyang Guo, Dan Liu, Yuexin Liu, Hao Ping

World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22: 66. Published online 2024 Feb 23. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6

PMCID:: PMC10885481

Article PDF–1.4M

Select item 687104912.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies

Roland Sparing, Dorothee Buelte, Ingo G. Meister, Tomás Pauš, Gereon R. Fink

Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jan; 29(1): 82–96. Published online 2007 Feb 22. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20360

PMCID:: PMC6871049

Article PDF–476K

Select item 979659213.

NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve‐sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome

Margaretha A. van der Slot, Michael A. den Bakker, Tamara S. C. Tan, Sebastiaan Remmers, Martijn B. Busstra, Melanie Gan, Sjoerd Klaver, John B. W. Rietbergen, Charlotte F. Kweldam, Mike Kliffen, Karen E. Hamoen, Leo M. Budel, Natascha N. T. Goemaere, Jozien Helleman, Chris H. Bangma, Monique J. Roobol, Geert J. L. H. van Leenders, the Anser Prostate Cancer Network

BJU Int. 2022 Nov; 130(5): 628–636. Published online 2022 Jun 5. doi: 10.1111/bju.15771

PMCID:: PMC9796592

Article PDF–763K

Select item 865024114.

Intralesional nerve-sparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment for giant cell tumor of the sacrum

Shinji Tsukamoto, Nikolin Ali, Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Kanya Honoki, Yasuhito Tanaka, Paolo Spinnato, Davide Maria Donati, Costantino Errani

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 1023. Published online 2021 Dec 6. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04907-0

PMCID:: PMC8650241

Article PDF–934K

Select item 879931115.

Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: Kobayashi's Method

Hiroyuki Yoshikawa

Surg J (N Y) 2021 Dec; 7(Suppl 2): S70–S76. Published online 2021 Sep 30. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728751

PMCID:: PMC8799311

Article PDF–554K

Select item 997846416.

Anatomical location of the surgically identifiable bladder branch of the inferior hypogastric plexus for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

Kentaro Sekiyama, Shingo Fujii, Masaki Mandai

Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Apr; 46: 101152. Published online 2023 Feb 18. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101152

PMCID:: PMC9978464

Article PDF–16M

Select item 907296417.

Significance of Nerve Plane for Inferior Mesenteric Plexus Preservation in Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery

Kai Li, Junjie Zeng, Pengcheng Pang, Hua Cheng, Xiaobo He, Fengyu Cao, Qiang Luo, Shilun Tong, Yongbin Zheng

Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 853662. Published online 2022 Apr 22. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.853662

PMCID:: PMC9072964

Article PDF–1.9M

Select item 824497918.

Sex-Dependent Reduction in Mechanical Allodynia in the Sural-Sparing Nerve Injury Model in Mice Lacking Merkel Cells

Sang-Min Jeon, Dennis Chang, Aleksander Geske, David D. Ginty, Michael J. Caterina

J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 30; 41(26): 5595–5619. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1668-20.2021

PMCID:: PMC8244979

Article PDF–9.8M

Select item 940803019.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Iliopsoas Plane Block: A Scoping Review of Quadriceps Weakness after Two Proclaimed Motor-Sparing Hip Blocks

Shang-Ru Yeoh, Yen Chou, Shun-Ming Chan, Jin-De Hou, Jui-An Lin

Healthcare (Basel) 2022 Aug; 10(8): 1565. Published online 2022 Aug 18. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081565

Correction in:: Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep; 10(9): 1804.

PMCID:: PMC9408030

Article PDF–3.0M

Select item 825973820.

Clinical Studies and Pre-clinical Animal Models on Facial Nerve Preservation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration Following Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Surgery–A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

Isabel C. Hostettler, Narayan Jayashankar, Christos Bikis, Stefan Wanderer, Edin Nevzati, Ravindran Karuppiah, Vicknes Waran, Daniel Kalbermatten, Luigi Mariani, Serge Marbacher, Raphael Guzman, Srinivas Madduri, Michel Roethlisberger

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9: 659413. Published online 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.659413

PMCID:: PMC8259738

Article PDF–5.5M

<< First< Prev

Page of 1724

Next >Last >>

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Manage Filters

PMC Images search for nerve sparing

Figure 3Recurrence-free (A), metastatic-free (B), and survival (C) probability in patients randomized to prostate capsule sparing and nerve sparing cystectomy

Prostate capsule sparing and nerve sparing patients demonstrated no differences in recurrence-free, metastatic-free, or survival probability (all p>0.05). P value generated by the log-rank test.

Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial

J Urol. ;193(1):64-70.
Figure 2Antegrade prostate dissection including bilateral nerve sparing (radical retropubic prostatectomy).

Antegrade nerve sparing of right lateral side

Open radical prostatectomy reproducing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Involving antegrade nerve sparing and continuous anastomosis

Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Nov-Dec;43(6):1043-1051.
Figure 2Change in sexual function stratified by SHIM score for patients randomized to prostate capsule sparing and nerve sparing cystectomy

In the nerve sparing cohort, 10 patients had a SHIM ≤21 and 10 patients had a SHIM >21. In the prostate capsule sparing cohort, 11 patients had a SHIM ≤21 and 9 patients had a SHIM >21. Average sexual function at 12 months compared with baseline decreased by 1±11 points for prostate capsule sparing patients and decreased by 23±30 points for nerve sparing patients. There was no difference in sexual function between the two approaches (p=0.06). P value generated from Wilcoxon Rank test.

Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial

J Urol. ;193(1):64-70.
Figure 1Change in urinary function for patients randomized to prostate capsule sparing and nerve sparing cystectomy

Average urinary function at 12 months compared with baseline decreased by 13±30 points for prostate capsule sparing patients and decreased by 28±33 points for nerve sparing patients. There was no difference in urinary function between the two approaches (p=0.10). P value generated from Wilcoxon Rank test.

Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial

J Urol. ;193(1):64-70.