U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination
You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 139

1.
Differences in the reporting of conflicts of interest and sponsorships in systematic reviews with meta-analyses in dentistry: an examination of factors associated with their reporting
Jonas Heymann, Naichuan Su, Clovis Mariano Faggion, Jr
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024; 9: 10. Published online 2024 Sep 30. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00150-y
PMCID:
PMC11443767
AbstractArticlePDF–1.0M
2.
Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal
Krishna Subedi, Nuwadatta Subedi, Rebicca Ranjit
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024; 9: 9. Published online 2024 Aug 23. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00149-5
PMCID:
PMC11342615
AbstractArticlePDF–718K
3.
Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols
David Blanco, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio, Aïda Cadellans-Arróniz
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024; 9: 6. Published online 2024 May 31. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00147-7
PMCID:
PMC11140857
AbstractArticlePDF–2.5M
4.
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training
Ariel Maia Lyons-Warren, Whitley W. Aamodt, Kathleen M. Pieper, Roy E. Strowd
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024; 9: 3. Published online 2024 Mar 8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00143-x
PMCID:
PMC10921741
AbstractArticlePDF–1.3M
5.
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Montoya, Barbara McGillivray, Charlotte R. Pennington, Chase H. Harrison, Crystal N. Steltenpohl, Jan Philipp Röer, Katherine S. Corker, Lisa M. Charron, Mahmoud Elsherif, Mario Malicki, Rachel Hayes-Harb, Sandra Grinschgl, Tess Neal, Thomas Rhys Evans, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, William L. D. Krenzer, Anabel Belaus, David Moreau, Debora I. Burin, Elizabeth Chin, Esther Plomp, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Jared Lyle, Jonathan M. Adler, Julia G. Bottesini, Katherine M. Lawson, Kathleen Schmidt, Kyrani Reneau, Lars Vilhuber, Ludo Waltman, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Paul E. Plonski, Sakshi Ghai, Sean Grant, Thu-Mai Christian, William Ngiam, Moin Syed
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024; 9: 2. Published online 2024 Feb 16. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5
PMCID:
PMC10870631
AbstractArticlePDF–1.1M
6.
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance
Irina Ibragimova, Helen Fulbright
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024; 9: 1. Published online 2024 Jan 19. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00142-4
PMCID:
PMC10797710
AbstractArticlePDF–1.0M
7.
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Thomas Perneger
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 13. Published online 2023 Sep 5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00137-1
PMCID:
PMC10478343
AbstractArticlePDF–1.2M
8.
Reporting quality of abstracts and inconsistencies with full text articles in pediatric orthopedic publications
Sherif Ahmed Kamel, Tamer A. El-Sobky
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 11. Published online 2023 Aug 23. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00135-3
PMCID:
PMC10463470
AbstractArticlePDF–1.1M
9.
Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals – a case study of 456 trials from the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection
Fabrice Frank, Nans Florens, Gideon Meyerowitz-katz, Jérôme Barriere, Éric Billy, Véronique Saada, Alexander Samuel, Jacques Robert, Lonni Besançon
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 9. Published online 2023 Aug 3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00134-4
PMCID:
PMC10398994
AbstractArticlePDF–1.3M
10.
A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank
Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J. Lee, Elena A. Erosheva
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 10. Published online 2023 Jul 24. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7
PMCID:
PMC10367367
AbstractArticlePDF–2.0M
11.
Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: perspectives from Kenyan research regulators
Edwin Were, Jepchirchir Kiplagat, Eunice Kaguiri, Rose Ayikukwei, Violet Naanyu
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 8. Published online 2023 Jul 12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00132-6
PMCID:
PMC10337100
AbstractArticlePDF–1.0M
12.
Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot
Ben W. Mol, Shimona Lai, Ayesha Rahim, Esmée M. Bordewijk, Rui Wang, Rik van Eekelen, Lyle C. Gurrin, Jim G. Thornton, Madelon van Wely, Wentao Li
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 6. Published online 2023 Jun 20. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00130-8
PMCID:
PMC10280869
AbstractArticlePDF–879K
13.
Responsible research practices could be more strongly endorsed by Australian university codes of research conduct
Yi Kai Ong, Kay L Double, Lisa Bero, Joanna Diong
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 5. Published online 2023 Jun 6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00129-1
PMCID:
PMC10242962
AbstractArticlePDF–1.2M
14.
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P. J. M. Horbach
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 4. Published online 2023 May 18. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5
Correction in:
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023; 8: 7.
PMCID:
PMC10191680
AbstractArticlePDF–1.0M
15.
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report
Jodi Schneider, Nathan D. Woods, Randi Proescholdt, the RISRS Team
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 6. Published online 2022 Sep 19. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x
PMCID:
PMC9483880
AbstractArticlePDF–951K
16.
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Danielle B. Rice, Ba’ Pham, Justin Presseau, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 5. Published online 2022 Jul 13. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y
Corrects:
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 1.
PMCID:
PMC9281154
CorrectionPDF–640K
17.
Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia
Omar Dewidar, Nour Elmestekawy, Vivian Welch
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 4. Published online 2022 Jul 4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00123-z
PMCID:
PMC9251949
AbstractArticlePDF–1.2M
18.
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol
William T. Gattrell, Amrit Pali Hungin, Amy Price, Christopher C. Winchester, David Tovey, Ellen L. Hughes, Esther J. van Zuuren, Keith Goldman, Patricia Logullo, Robert Matheis, Niall Harrison
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 3. Published online 2022 Jun 7. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0
PMCID:
PMC9171734
AbstractArticlePDF–1.4M
19.
Individual versus general structured feedback to improve agreement in grant peer review: a randomized controlled trial
Jan-Ole Hesselberg, Knut Inge Fostervold, Pål Ulleberg, Ida Svege
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 12. Published online 2021 Sep 30. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00115-5
PMCID:
PMC8485516
AbstractArticlePDF–1.1M
20.
Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam
Tamarinde Haven, Joeri Tijdink, Brian Martinson, Lex Bouter, Frans Oort
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 7. Published online 2021 May 3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00110-w
PMCID:
PMC8094603
AbstractArticlePDF–606K

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Find related data

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
You are here: NCBI > Literature > PubMed Central (PMC)
Support Center