"Res Integr Peer Rev"[jour] - PMC

You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

<< First< Prev

Page of 6

Next >Last >>

Select item 92811541.

Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers

Danielle B. Rice, Ba’ Pham, Justin Presseau, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 5. Published online 2022 Jul 13. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y

Corrects:: Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 1.

PMCID:: PMC9281154

Correction PDF–640K Cite

Select item 88948282.

What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis

Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, Ksenia Crane, Katie Meadmore, Kathryn Fackrell, Hazel Church, Simon Fraser, Amanda Blatch-Jones

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022; 7: 2. Published online 2022 Mar 4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2

PMCID:: PMC8894828

Article PubReader PDF–848K Cite

Select item 86383543.

Peer review reduces spin in PCORI research reports

Evan Mayo-Wilson, Meredith L. Phillips, Avonne E. Connor, Kelly J. Vander Ley, Kevin Naaman, Mark Helfand

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 16. Published online 2021 Dec 1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00119-1

PMCID:: PMC8638354

Article PubReader PDF–861K Cite

Select item 86322004.

Gender disparity in publication records: a qualitative study of women researchers in computing and engineering

Mohammad Hosseini, Shiva Sharifzad

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 15. Published online 2021 Dec 1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00117-3

PMCID:: PMC8632200

Article PubReader PDF–1.2M Cite

Select item 81739775.

Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices

Evan Mayo-Wilson, Sean Grant, Lauren Supplee, Sina Kianersi, Afsah Amin, Alex DeHaven, David Mellor

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 9. Published online 2021 Jun 2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00112-8

PMCID:: PMC8173977

Article PubReader PDF–1.3M Cite

Select item 80946036.

Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Tamarinde Haven, Joeri Tijdink, Brian Martinson, Lex Bouter, Frans Oort

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 7. Published online 2021 May 3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00110-w

PMCID:: PMC8094603

Article PubReader PDF–606K Cite

Select item 80480297.

Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice

Elizabeth Wager, Sabine Kleinert, on behalf of the CLUE Working Group

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 6. Published online 2021 Apr 15. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3

PMCID:: PMC8048029

Article PubReader PDF–635K Cite

Select item 79235228.

Steps toward preregistration of research on research integrity

Klaas Sijtsma, Wilco H. M. Emons, Nicholas H. Steneck, Lex M. Bouter

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 5. Published online 2021 Mar 1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00108-4

PMCID:: PMC7923522

Article PubReader PDF–551K Cite

Select item 78852479.

Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review

Travis G. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Chi-Yeung Choi, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Jeff C. Clements, Joshua A. Rash

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 4. Published online 2021 Feb 16. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00107-x

PMCID:: PMC7885247

Article PubReader PDF–525K Cite

Select item 784910710.

Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts

Nick Kinney, Araba Wubah, Miguel Roig, Harold R. Garner

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 2. Published online 2021 Feb 1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00106-y

PMCID:: PMC7849107

Article PubReader PDF–1.6M Cite

Select item 780751611.

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) — a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science

Noémie Aubert Bonn, Wim Pinxten

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 1. Published online 2021 Jan 14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00104-0

PMCID:: PMC7807516

Article PubReader PDF–1.2M Cite

Select item 780749312.

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science

Noémie Aubert Bonn, Wim Pinxten

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021; 6: 3. Published online 2021 Jan 14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z

PMCID:: PMC7807493

Article PubReader PDF–1.3M Cite

Select item 773155013.

Survey study of research integrity officers’ perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct

Michael Kalichman

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020; 5: 17. Published online 2020 Dec 11. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00103-1

PMCID:: PMC7731550

Article PubReader PDF–560K Cite

Select item 770620714.

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, Victor G. S. Queiroz, Thiago C. Moulin, Carlos A. M. Carvalho, Clarissa B. Haas, Danielle Rayêe, David E. Henshall, Evandro A. De-Souza, Felippe E. Amorim, Flávia Z. Boos, Gerson D. Guercio, Igor R. Costa, Karina L. Hajdu, Lieve van Egmond, Martin Modrák, Pedro B. Tan, Richard J. Abdill, Steven J. Burgess, Sylvia F. S. Guerra, Vanessa T. Bortoluzzi, Olavo B. Amaral

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020; 5: 16. Published online 2020 Dec 1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3