Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from Books

Fecal DNA testing in screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults

Author(s):
Lin, Jennifer, 1974-
United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center
Effective Health Care Program (US)
Title(s):
Fecal DNA testing in screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk adultsĀ [electronic resource] / prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth M Webber, Tracy L Beil, Katrina A Goddard, Evelyn P Whitlock.
Series:
Comparative effectiveness review ; no. 52
AHRQ publication ; no. 12-EHC022-EF
Country of Publication:
United States
Publisher:
Rockville, MD : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, [2012]
Description:
1 online resource (1 PDF file (various pagings)) : ill.
Language:
English
Electronic Links:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91369/
Summary:
OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence on fecal DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk for colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and the Health Technology Assessments Database from 2000 through August 11, 2011 and grey literature including recent conference abstracts, regulatory documents, unpublished information from the manufacturer, and expert suggestions. REVIEW METHODS: Two investigators independently reviewed all abstracts and full-text articles against a set of a priori inclusion criteria and assessed the quality of included articles using established criteria. Disagreements were resolved through consultation of a third investigator. We evaluated and summarized clinical and methodological characteristics and internal and external validity of studies. Finally, we assessed the overall strength of evidence for each outcome based on risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision of the evidence. RESULTS: Despite the availability of numerous excluded initial validation studies of fecal DNA testing, we found only three studies that examined the test accuracy of fecal DNA testing in screening populations. Initial validation studies were excluded due to their use of highly selected patient populations. Two fair-quality diagnostic accuracy studies (n=5004) evaluating a multi-marker fecal DNA found differing sensitivities to detect CRC (25 percent [95% CI, 5 to 57 percent] versus 51.6 percent, [95% CI, 34.8 to 68.0]). Sensitivity for advanced adenomas was similarly low in both studies. Another small study and a subset analysis of one of the larger studies were both poor quality and evaluated different tests. We found no studies that specifically evaluated the harms of fecal DNA testing. While three poor-quality analytic validity studies showed that technological advances can improve the analytic sensitivity of assays, it is unclear if these advances are applicable to the currently available test. Six fair-to poor-quality studies that evaluated acceptability found that fecal DNA testing is generally acceptable, although an important test attribute for acceptability appears to be the test's accuracy (which is yet unknown). No studies have evaluated the relative acceptability of fecal DNA tests to FIT tests. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal DNA tests have insufficient evidence about its diagnostic accuracy to screen for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk patients. There is also insufficient evidence for the harms, analytic validity, and acceptability of testing in comparison to other screening modalities. Existing evidence has little or no applicability to currently available fecal DNA testing.
MeSH:
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis*
Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control*
Feces/chemistry
Mass Screening/methods
Occult Blood
Sensitivity and Specificity
United States
Publication Type(s):
Meta-Analysis
Notes:
"February 2012."
Includes bibliographical references.
Contract No. HHS-290-2007-10057-I.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed on Apr. 19, 2012).
NLM ID:
101581813 [Electronic Resource]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center