Hearing Rehabilitation Implementing a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device: Single-Center Experience

Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Jun;100(3_suppl):199S-203S. doi: 10.1177/0145561319870481. Epub 2019 Sep 29.

Abstract

Bone conduction implants based on percutaneous abutment acoustic transmission have been implemented in patients with satisfactory outcomes. However, adverse soft tissue outcomes present a limitation. Transcutaneous bone conduction devices (t-BCDs) are an alternative that may mitigate these complications. A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent implantation of a t-BCD from 2013 to 2017. Surgical outcomes were reviewed including wound complications, frequency of device use, patient concerns regarding the device, and reported patient satisfaction. A total of 37 patients were implanted with the bone-anchored hearing aids, BAHA Attract (Cochlear™ Baha® Implant System). Average follow-up time was 271.8 days. Postoperatively, 7 (18.9%) patients complained of soft tissue changes or issues with wound healing. Twelve (32.4%) patients requested adjustment of their devices. The t-BCD is an excellent option for hearing rehabilitation. Overall, the complication rate is low, patient satisfaction is high, and successful conversion from a percutaneous device is possible with minimal risk.

Keywords: BAHA; bone anchored hearing aid; hearing loss.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Bone Conduction
  • Correction of Hearing Impairment / instrumentation*
  • Correction of Hearing Impairment / methods
  • Female
  • Hearing Aids*
  • Hearing Loss, Conductive / physiopathology
  • Hearing Loss, Conductive / rehabilitation*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Prosthesis Implantation / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult