A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalised adults in Asia

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 May;49(5):579-588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Abstract

Ceftazidime/avibactam comprises the broad-spectrum cephalosporin ceftazidime and the non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam. This phase 3, randomised, double-blind study (NCT01726023) assessed the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) in Asian countries. Subjects aged 18-90 years and hospitalised with cIAI requiring surgical intervention were randomised 1:1 to receive every 8 h either: ceftazidime/avibactam (2000/500 mg, 2-h infusion) followed by metronidazole (500 mg, 60-min infusion); or meropenem (1000 mg, 30-min infusion). Non-inferiority of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference in clinical cure rate was greater than -12.5% at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (28-35 days after randomisation) in the clinically evaluable (CE) population. Safety was also evaluated. Of 441 subjects randomised, 432 received at least one dose of study medication (ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole, n = 215; meropenem, n = 217). In the CE population at the TOC visit, non-inferiority of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem was demonstrated, with clinical cure reported for 93.8% (166/177) and 94.0% (173/184) of subjects, respectively (between-group difference, -0.2, 95% CI -5.53 to 4.97). The clinical cure rate with ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole was comparable in subjects with ceftazidime-non-susceptible and ceftazidime-susceptible isolates (95.7% vs. 92.1%, respectively). Adverse events were similar between the study groups. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole was non-inferior to meropenem in the treatment of cIAIs in Asian populations and was effective against ceftazidime-non-susceptible pathogens. No new safety concerns were identified.

Keywords: Asia; Ceftazidime/avibactam; Complicated intra-abdominal infection; Efficacy; Phase 3; Safety.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Asia
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / adverse effects
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / therapeutic use*
  • Ceftazidime / adverse effects
  • Ceftazidime / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
  • Female
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Intraabdominal Infections / drug therapy*
  • Intraabdominal Infections / microbiology
  • Male
  • Meropenem
  • Metronidazole / adverse effects
  • Metronidazole / therapeutic use*
  • Middle Aged
  • Thienamycins / adverse effects
  • Thienamycins / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult
  • beta-Lactamase Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • beta-Lactamase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Azabicyclo Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Thienamycins
  • avibactam, ceftazidime drug combination
  • beta-Lactamase Inhibitors
  • Metronidazole
  • Ceftazidime
  • Meropenem

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01726023