Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Sep; 59(9): 749–754.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036517
PMCID: PMC1733152
PMID: 16100312

Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences

M. Bellis, K. Hughes, S. Hughes, and J. Ashton
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

Paternal discrepancy (PD) occurs when a child is identified as being biologically fathered by someone other than the man who believes he is the father. This paper examines published evidence on levels of PD and its public health consequences. Rates vary between studies from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%, n = 17). Using information from genetic and behavioural studies, the article identifies those who conceive younger, live in deprivation, are in long term relationships (rather than marriages), or in certain cultural groups are at higher risk. Public health consequences of PD being exposed include family break up and violence. However, leaving PD undiagnosed means cases having incorrect information on their genetics and fathers continuing to suspect that children may not be theirs. Increasing paternity testing and use of DNA techniques in clinical and judicial procedures means more cases of PD will be identified. Given developing roles for individual's genetics in decisions made by health services, private services (for example, insurance), and even in personal lifestyle decisions, the dearth of intelligence on how and when PD should be exposed urgently needs addressing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Lucassen A, Parker M. Revealing false paternity: some ethical considerations. Lancet. 2001 Mar 31;357(9261):1033–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spriggs M. IVF mixup: white couple have black babies. J Med Ethics. 2003 Apr;29(2):65–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chiche Jean-Daniel, Cariou Alain, Mira Jean-Paul. Bench-to-bedside review: fulfilling promises of the Human Genome Project. Crit Care. 2002 Jun;6(3):212–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson JF, Weale ME, Smith AC, Gratrix F, Fletcher B, Thomas MG, Bradman N, Goldstein DB. Population genetic structure of variable drug response. Nat Genet. 2001 Nov;29(3):265–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jobling Mark A, Gill Peter. Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Oct;5(10):739–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ross Lainie Friedman. Disclosing misattributed paternity. Bioethics. 1996 Apr;10(2):114–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cerda-Flores RM, Barton SA, Marty-Gonzalez LF, Rivas F, Chakraborty R. Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999 Jul;109(3):281–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brock DJ, Shrimpton AE. Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. Lancet. 1991 Nov 2;338(8775):1151–1151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dowdell Elizabeth Burgess. Grandmother caregivers and caregiver burden. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;29(5):299–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner CH, Weir BS. Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor Popul Biol. 2003 May;63(3):173–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hsu CM, Huang NE, Tsai LC, Kao LG, Chao CH, Linacre A, Lee JC. Identification of victims of the 1998 Taoyuan Airbus crash accident using DNA analysis. Int J Legal Med. 1999;113(1):43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sykes B, Irven C. Surnames and the Y chromosome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr;66(4):1417–1419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helgason Agnar, Hrafnkelsson Birgir, Gulcher Jeffrey R, Ward Ryk, Stefánsson Kári. A populationwide coalescent analysis of Icelandic matrilineal and patrilineal genealogies: evidence for a faster evolutionary rate of mtDNA lineages than Y chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jun;72(6):1370–1388. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Macintyre S, Sooman A. Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. Lancet. 1991 Oct 5;338(8771):869–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson AM, Mercer CH, Erens B, Copas AJ, McManus S, Wellings K, Fenton KA, Korovessis C, Macdowall W, Nanchahal K, et al. Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet. 2001 Dec 1;358(9296):1835–1842. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Finer LB, Darroch JE, Singh S. Sexual partnership patterns as a behavioral risk factor for sexually transmitted diseases. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):228–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cherkas Lynn F, Oelsner Elizabeth C, Mak YT, Valdes Anna, Spector Tim D. Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Twin Res. 2004 Dec;7(6):649–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schofield MJ, Minichiello V, Mishra GD, Plummer D, Savage J. Sexually transmitted infections and use of sexual health services among young Australian women: women's health Australia study. Int J STD AIDS. 2000 May;11(5):313–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Low N, Sterne JA, Barlow D. Inequalities in rates of gonorrhoea and chlamydia between black ethnic groups in south east London: cross sectional study. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Feb;77(1):15–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • du Toit ED, May RM, Halliday IL, Schlaphoff T, Taljaard DG. Paternity exclusion using 18 genetic systems in 2124 cases in four South African population groups. S Afr Med J. 1989 Feb 4;75(3):103–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bellis Mark A, Hughes Karen, Ashton John R. The promiscuous 10%? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Nov;58(11):889–890. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Steen CD. Cystic fibrosis: inheritance, genetics and treatment. Br J Nurs. 6(4):192–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Winkelmann BR, Hager J, Kraus WE, Merlini P, Keavney B, Grant PJ, Muhlestein JB, Granger CB. Genetics of coronary heart disease: current knowledge and research principles. Am Heart J. 2000 Oct;140(4):S11–S26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frank Steven A. Genetic predisposition to cancer - insights from population genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Oct;5(10):764–772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummings David E, Schwartz Michael W. Genetics and pathophysiology of human obesity. Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:453–471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Evans JP, Skrzynia C, Burke W. The complexities of predictive genetic testing. BMJ. 2001 Apr 28;322(7293):1052–1056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marteau TM, Lerman C. Genetic risk and behavioural change. BMJ. 2001 Apr 28;322(7293):1056–1059. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mansfield C, Hopfer S, Marteau TM. Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. European Concerted Action: DADA (Decision-making After the Diagnosis of a fetal Abnormality). Prenat Diagn. 1999 Sep;19(9):808–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Burke Wylie. Genetic testing. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1867–1875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ashton JR. Pater semper. Lancet. 1973 Aug 25;2(7826):451–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soderdahl Douglas W, Rabah Danny, McCune Thomas, Colonna John, French Roland, Robey Edwin, Fabrizio Michael D. Misattributed paternity in a living related donor: to disclose or not to disclose? Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):590–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ritter MM. Genetic testing and paternity. Lancet. 2001 Jul 21;358(9277):241–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wade Terrance J, Pevalin David J. Marital transitions and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Jun;45(2):155–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Amato PR. Children of divorce in the 1990s: an update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol. 2001 Sep;15(3):355–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Braver Sanford L, Ellman Ira M, Fabricius William V. Relocation of children after divorce and children's best interests: new evidence and legal considerations. J Fam Psychol. 2003 Jun;17(2):206–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Asch DA, Hershey JC, Dekay ML, Pauly MV, Patton JP, Jedrziewski MK, Frei F, Giardine R, Kant JA, Mennuti MT. Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: costs and clinical outcomes. Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2):202–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raithatha Nick, Smith Richard D. Disclosure of genetic tests for health insurance: is it ethical not to? Lancet. 2004 Jan 31;363(9406):395–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valentin J. Exclusions and attributions of paternity: practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):420–431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Houtz TD, Wenk RE, Brooks MA, Dawson RB. Laboratory evidence of unsuspected parental consanguinity among cases of disputed paternity. Forensic Sci Int. 1982 Nov-Dec;20(3):207–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mickey MR, Gjertson DW, Terasaki PI. Empirical validation of the Essen-Möller probability of paternity. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Jul;39(1):123–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helminen P, Ehnholm C, Lokki ML, Jeffreys A, Peltonen L. Application of DNA "fingerprints" to paternity determinations. Lancet. 1988 Mar 12;1(8585):574–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeffreys AJ, Turner M, Debenham P. The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 May;48(5):824–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helminen P, Sajantila A, Johnsson V, Lukka M, Ehnholm C, Peltonen L. Amplification of three hypervariable DNA regions by polymerase chain reaction for paternity determinations: comparison with conventional methods and DNA fingerprinting. Mol Cell Probes. 1992 Feb;6(1):21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Krawczak M, Böhm I, Nürnberg P, Hampe J, Hundrieser J, Pöche H, Peters C, Slomski R, Kwiatkowska J, Nagy M, et al. Paternity testing with oligonucleotide multilocus probe (CAC)5/(GTG)5: a multicenter study. Forensic Sci Int. 1993 May;59(2):101–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strom CM, Rechitsky S, Ginsberg N, Verlinsky O, Verlinsky Y. Prenatal paternity testing with deoxyribonucleic acid techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;174(6):1849–1854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moliaka Iu K, Ovchinnikov IV, Shlenskii AB, Korovaitseva GI, Rogaev EI. Genotiposkopiia DNK v opredelenii spornogo ottsovstva: ispol'zovanie gibridizatsionnykh zondov. Genetika. 1997 Jun;33(6):831–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Geada H, Brito RM, Ribeiro T, Espinheira R. Portuguese population and paternity investigation studies with a multiplex PCR--the AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Jan 24;108(1):31–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SUSSMAN LN, SCHATKIN SB. Blood-grouping tests in undisputed paternity proceedings. J Am Med Assoc. 1957 May 18;164(3):249–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peritz E, Rust PF. On the estimation of the nonpaternity rate using more than one blood-group system. Am J Hum Genet. 1972 Jan;24(1):46–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Neel JV, Weiss KM. The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. XII. Biodemographic studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 Jan;42(1):25–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ashton GC. Mismatches in genetic markers in a large family study. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Jul;32(4):601–613. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Salmon D, Seger J, Salmon C. Expected and observed proportion of subjects excluded from paternity by blood phenotypes of a child and its mother in a sample of 171 families. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):432–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lathrop GM, Hooper AB, Huntsman JW, Ward RH. Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Mar;35(2):241–262. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peñaloza R, Núez C, Alatorre S, Lagunes R, García Escobar B, Salamanca F, Zavala C. Frecuencia de paternidad extraconyugal en una muestra de la población Mexicana. Rev Invest Clin. 1986 Jul-Sep;38(3):287–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Roux MG, Pascal O, Andre MT, Herbert O, David A, Moisan JP. Non-paternity and genetic counselling. Lancet. 1992 Sep 5;340(8819):607–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poon MC, Anand S, Fraser BM, Hoar DI, Sinclair GD. Hemophilia B carrier determination based on family-specific mutation detection by DNA single-strand conformation analysis. J Lab Clin Med. 1993 Jul;122(1):55–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sasse G, Müller H, Chakraborty R, Ott J. Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Hum Hered. 1994 Nov-Dec;44(6):337–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chataway J, Sawcer S, Feakes R, Coraddu F, Broadley S, Jones HB, Clayton D, Gray J, Goodfellow PN, Compston A. A screen of candidates from peaks of linkage: evidence for the involvement of myeloperoxidase in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1999 Aug 3;98(2):208–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
Feedback