NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM1254659 Query DataSets for GSM1254659
Status Public on Jan 21, 2015
Title Picea glauca-xylem-August-rep 5
Sample type RNA
 
Source name Picea glauca xylem, August
Organism Picea glauca
Characteristics tissue: xylem
slide batch: LA001
month of sampling: August
biological repetition: 5
internal ^sample: E172-01-40-2X
Growth protocol 4-year old seedlings obtained from nursery planting stock (open-pollinated seed lots) as 3-year-old seedlings of Picea glauca and Picea abies. Upon reception they were transferred to 8-inch pots and grown in a tunnel under natural light conditions for one year. Sampling of xylem was done in June, July, August and September as described (Pavy et al. 2008). 6 trees were sampled on each date, for each specie.
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol All of the tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after removal from the trees and stored at -80°C. Tissues were ground using a Mixer Mill MM 300 (Retsch, Haan, Germany) and total RNA was extracted following Chang et al. (1993) as described in Pavy et al. (2008) for all of the samples.
Label Alexa 555
Label protocol Total RNA (1 µg) was transcribed in-vitro by using the Amino Allyl MessageAmp II aRNA Amplification kit (Ambion by Life Technologies, Austin, TX, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The aaRNA (10 ug per sample) was labeled using Alexa Fluor 555 dyes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and purified as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Dye incorporation efficiency was determined by using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
 
Hybridization protocol Each microarray was hybridized with one sample labelled with one dye. The samples were mixed and the volume was reduced to ~10 µl by evaporating excess water in a DNA 120 speedvac (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Labelled aRNAs were fragmented for 15 minutes at 70°C using Ambion’s ”RNA Fragmentation Reagents“, placed on ice for 1 minute, denatured for 2 minutes at 95°C, put on ice for 2 min and resuspended in 120 µl hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5X SSC, 0,1% SDS, 0,1 mg/mL Herring sperm DNA) preheated to 55°C. Samples were kept in a heating block at 50°C until hybridization. Hybridizations were performed in HS400Pro hybridization stations (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland). The slides were heated at 80°C for 10 minutes, then washed once at 37°C with 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS for 20 seconds and once at 50°C with 2X SSC, 0.5% SDS for 20 seconds, and prehybridized for 1 hour at 65°C in 5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 0.1 mg/ml Herring Sperm DNA. Next the slides were washed at 55°C with 2X SSC, 0.5% SDS for 1 minute with a 30 seconds soak and washed again at 45°C for 1 minute with the same solution. The resuspended labelled targets were injected into the chambers and hybridized for 16 hours at 45°C with sample agitation. The slides were then washed as follows: 2 times 1 minute 30 seconds at 45°C with 30 seconds soaking in 2X SSC, 0.5% SDS, 1 time 1 minute at 45° in 2X SSC, 0.5% SDS, 2 times 1 minute 30 seconds at 45°C with 30 seconds soaking in 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 1 time 1 minute at 37°C with 20 seconds soaking in 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 1 time 1 minute at 23°C with 20 seconds soaking in 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 1 time 1 minute 30 seconds at 23°C with 30 seconds soaking in 0.1X SSC, 1 time 30 seconds at 23°C in 0.1X SSC and 2 times 30 seconds at 23°C in milliQ filtered water. Finally slides were dried for 2 minutes 30 seconds with nitrogen gaz.
Scan protocol Slide scanning was performed at 5 micron resolution on a PowerScanner (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland) microarray scanner at 50% laser power with the autogain funtion on to automatically adjust PMT level. Image analysis was carried out using ArrayPro Analyzer v. 6.3 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Description LA001-18213
Data processing Median intensity and local background were obtained for each spot on the array. Bad spots resulting from dust, high local background or saturation were flagged. Net intensity was calculated by subtracting trimmed background from median intensity. Data analyses were performed using customized scripts for R and Bioconductor (http://www.r-project.org and http://www.bioconductor.org). Spots that were flagged as presenting abnormal morphology during the image processing were replaced by mean value of the remaining spots of the same probe from the other slides from the same sample type. Background-subtracted data were log2-transformed and quantile normalization was used to normalize intensity distributions between arrays.
 
Submission date Oct 30, 2013
Last update date Jan 21, 2015
Contact name John MacKay
E-mail(s) john.mackay@sbf.ulaval.ca
Organization name Université Laval
Department Centre d'étude de la forêt
Lab Dr. John MacKay
Street address 1030, avenue de la Médecine, Pavillon C.-E. Marchand
City Québec
State/province Québec
ZIP/Postal code G1V 0A6
Country Canada
 
Platform ID GPL15033
Series (1)
GSE51884 Transcriptome-wide analysis of active xylem in White Spruce and Norway Spruce during the growth season

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
VALUE Background-subtracted and normalized (quantile) single-channel signal intensity

Data table
ID_REF VALUE
1 6.813647602
2 2.442943496
3 8.010090965
4 6.088346575
5 2.442943496
6 10.47856951
7 2.442943496
8 5.375039431
9 2.442943496
10 6.088346575
11 8.779633869
12 2.442943496
13 6.813647602
14 2.442943496
15 2.442943496
16 4.846012672
17 9.059541629
18 5.375039431
19 2.442943496
20 2.442943496

Total number of rows: 34992

Table truncated, full table size 604 Kbytes.




Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSM1254659_000000018213-532-E172-E175-2012-01-20.txt.gz 830.5 Kb (ftp)(http) TXT
Processed data included within Sample table

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap