NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM1220965 Query DataSets for GSM1220965
Status Public on May 29, 2014
Title e9.5 vs. embryos (MvF)
Sample type genomic
 
Channel 1
Source name Trophoblast giant cells - e9.5
Organism Mus musculus
Characteristics strain: C57BL/6
Stage: e9.5
gender: male
Treatment protocol Pregnant C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River. Copulation was determined by the presence of a vaginal plug the morning after mating, and embryonic day 0.5 (e0.5) was defined as noon of that day. TGCs and embryos were dissected in 1X PBS (1:10 10X PBS, pH=7.4; Gibco) and stored on ice until further processing. TGCs were dissected away from the placental disk, decidua, and, if possible, Reichert’s membrane. For gathering 2N genomic DNA, at e9.5-10.5, the embryo body, after removal of obvious organs and head (removed at otic vesicle), was collected; and at later stages, limbs, or a mixture of limbs and the tail, were collected. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the APLAC protocol and the institutional guidelines set by the Veterinary Service Center at Stanford University.
Extracted molecule genomic DNA
Extraction protocol Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh tissue and cultured cells using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Before column purification, we digested in vivo and in vitro samples with proteinase-K (600 mAU/ml solution or 40 mAU/mg protein) overnight and for 10 minutes, respectively, at 56C, followed by 4 minute incubation with RNase A (100 mg/mL) (Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit). For arrays performed on DNA from TGCs and embryonic controls, genomic DNA from two individuals in the same litter were pooled for each condition. For megakaryocyte arrays, cells derived from 5-6 livers from a single litter were pooled for each condition. For controls for the megakaryocyte array, three embryos (subset of the litter from which livers were collected from) were pooled for each condition. For arrays performed on DNA from cultured cells, two replicates from different passages were used (5 million cells each).
Label Cy5
Label protocol For each condition, approximately 4 μg DNA was sent to the Biomedical Genomics Core at the Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (Columbus, OH) for processing with the SurePrint G3 Mouse CGH Microarray Kit, 4x180k (Agilent). When possible (ie: all arrays performed on DNA from in vivo tissue), to ensure that the arrays detect copy number variation, duplicates consist of 1) female test versus male control and 2) male test versus female control.
 
Channel 2
Source name Embryo - e9.5
Organism Mus musculus
Characteristics strain: C57BL/6
Stage: e9.5
gender: female
Treatment protocol Pregnant C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River. Copulation was determined by the presence of a vaginal plug the morning after mating, and embryonic day 0.5 (e0.5) was defined as noon of that day. TGCs and embryos were dissected in 1X PBS (1:10 10X PBS, pH=7.4; Gibco) and stored on ice until further processing. TGCs were dissected away from the placental disk, decidua, and, if possible, Reichert’s membrane. For gathering 2N genomic DNA, at e9.5-10.5, the embryo body, after removal of obvious organs and head (removed at otic vesicle), was collected; and at later stages, limbs, or a mixture of limbs and the tail, were collected. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the APLAC protocol and the institutional guidelines set by the Veterinary Service Center at Stanford University.
Extracted molecule genomic DNA
Extraction protocol Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh tissue and cultured cells using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Before column purification, we digested in vivo and in vitro samples with proteinase-K (600 mAU/ml solution or 40 mAU/mg protein) overnight and for 10 minutes, respectively, at 56C, followed by 4 minute incubation with RNase A (100 mg/mL) (Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit). For arrays performed on DNA from TGCs and embryonic controls, genomic DNA from two individuals in the same litter were pooled for each condition. For megakaryocyte arrays, cells derived from 5-6 livers from a single litter were pooled for each condition. For controls for the megakaryocyte array, three embryos (subset of the litter from which livers were collected from) were pooled for each condition. For arrays performed on DNA from cultured cells, two replicates from different passages were used (5 million cells each).
Label Cy3
Label protocol For each condition, approximately 4 μg DNA was sent to the Biomedical Genomics Core at the Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (Columbus, OH) for processing with the SurePrint G3 Mouse CGH Microarray Kit, 4x180k (Agilent). When possible (ie: all arrays performed on DNA from in vivo tissue), to ensure that the arrays detect copy number variation, duplicates consist of 1) female test versus male control and 2) male test versus female control.
 
 
Hybridization protocol The standard steps of the Agilent arrayCGH hybridization protocol were performed by the Biomedical Genomics Core at the Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (Columbus, OH) using the SurePrint G3 Mouse CGH Microarray Kit, 4x180k (Agilent).
Scan protocol The standard steps of the Agilent arrayCGH scan protocol were performed by the Biomedical Genomics Core at the Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (Columbus, OH) using the SurePrint G3 Mouse CGH Microarray Kit, 4x180k (Agilent).
Data processing The standard steps of the Agilent arrayCGH data processing were performed by the Biomedical Genomics Core at the Research Institute at Nationwide Childrens Hospital (Columbus, OH). Log ratios from the data were then transformed into normalized log 2 ratios.
 
Submission date Sep 03, 2013
Last update date May 30, 2014
Contact name Roberta L Hannibal
E-mail(s) robertah@stanford.edu
Organization name Stanford University
Department Genetics
Street address 300 Pasteur Drive
City Stanford
State/province CA
ZIP/Postal code 94305
Country USA
 
Platform ID GPL10449
Series (2)
GSE50543 Trophoblast giant cell underrepresentation (CGH)
GSE50585 Trophoblast giant cell underrepresentation

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
VALUE Normalized Log2 ratio of test/control.

Data table
ID_REF VALUE
107727 0.007468806
12603 -0.159898126
150389 -0.019689018
28542 0.050823825
45744 0.013336828
43647 -0.034383923
106336 0.052773398
33635 0.030533714
69025 -0.039859516
156371 -0.100055581
172930 -0.085243436
121051 -0.116191771
65236 -0.122954323
71850 -0.009511939
48015 -0.155823276
77199 -0.062766083
160308 -0.137257286
61971 -0.008621136
13072 -0.042817188
54347 -0.104598183

Total number of rows: 174305

Table truncated, full table size 3178 Kbytes.




Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSM1220965_US85103615_252741110295_S01_CGH_1010_Sep10_1_4.txt.gz 18.7 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
Processed data included within Sample table

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap