U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000245.4(MET):c.2209A>G (p.Ser737Gly) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Feb 24, 2022
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001844258.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000245.4(MET):c.2209A>G (p.Ser737Gly)]

NM_000245.4(MET):c.2209A>G (p.Ser737Gly)

Gene:
MET:MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
7q31.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000245.4(MET):c.2209A>G (p.Ser737Gly)
HGVS:
  • NC_000007.14:g.116758565A>G
  • NG_008996.1:g.91161A>G
  • NM_000245.4:c.2209A>GMANE SELECT
  • NM_001127500.3:c.2209A>G
  • NM_001324401.3:c.2209A>G
  • NM_001324402.2:c.919A>G
  • NP_000236.2:p.Ser737Gly
  • NP_001120972.1:p.Ser737Gly
  • NP_001311330.1:p.Ser737Gly
  • NP_001311331.1:p.Ser307Gly
  • LRG_662t1:c.2209A>G
  • LRG_662:g.91161A>G
  • NC_000007.13:g.116398619A>G
  • NM_001127500.1:c.2209A>G
  • NM_001127500.2:c.2209A>G
Protein change:
S307G
Links:
dbSNP: rs755571526
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs755571526
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000245.4:c.2209A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001127500.3:c.2209A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001324401.3:c.2209A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001324402.2:c.919A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV002103587Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Feb 24, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Genomic profiling of Chinese patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Yang B, Zhao X, Wan C, Ma X, Niu S, Guo A, Wang J, Wang J, Sun D, Jiao S.

BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07829-1.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
33588785
PMCID:
PMC7885246

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV002103587.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Variant summary: MET c.2209A>G (p.Ser737Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the 2nd IPT (Ig-like, plexins, transcription factors) domain (IPR002909) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 249220 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.2209A>G, has been reported in the literature as a germline variant in an individual affected with bladder carcinoma. This report however does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2025