U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.365G>A (p.Arg122Gln) AND not provided

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (2 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Dec 27, 2022
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001559116.4

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.365G>A (p.Arg122Gln)]

NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.365G>A (p.Arg122Gln)

Gene:
PIGO:phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class O [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
9p13.3
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.365G>A (p.Arg122Gln)
HGVS:
  • NC_000009.12:g.35095201C>T
  • NG_031990.1:g.6401G>A
  • NM_001201484.2:c.365G>A
  • NM_032634.4:c.365G>AMANE SELECT
  • NM_152850.4:c.365G>A
  • NP_001188413.1:p.Arg122Gln
  • NP_116023.2:p.Arg122Gln
  • NP_690577.2:p.Arg122Gln
  • NC_000009.11:g.35095198C>T
  • NM_032634.3:c.365G>A
Protein change:
R122Q
Links:
dbSNP: rs756043994
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs756043994
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001201484.2:c.365G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_032634.4:c.365G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_152850.4:c.365G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
none provided
Identifiers:
MedGen: C3661900

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV001781195GeneDx
criteria provided, single submitter

(GeneDx Variant Classification Process June 2021)
Uncertain significance
(Mar 5, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV004229840Athena Diagnostics
criteria provided, single submitter

(Athena Diagnostics Criteria)
Uncertain significance
(Dec 27, 2022)
unknownclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedunknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders.

Karbassi I, Maston GA, Love A, DiVincenzo C, Braastad CD, Elzinga CD, Bright AR, Previte D, Zhang K, Rowland CM, McCarthy M, Lapierre JL, Dubois F, Medeiros KA, Batish SD, Jones J, Liaquat K, Hoffman CA, Jaremko M, Wang Z, Sun W, Buller-Burckle A, et al.

Hum Mutat. 2016 Jan;37(1):127-34. doi: 10.1002/humu.22918. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
26467025
PMCID:
PMC4737317

Details of each submission

From GeneDx, SCV001781195.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Athena Diagnostics, SCV004229840.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1unknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024