U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.302A>C (p.Glu101Ala) AND Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Nov 1, 2023
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000820452.6

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.302A>C (p.Glu101Ala)]

NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.302A>C (p.Glu101Ala)

Gene:
FLCN:folliculin [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
17p11.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.302A>C (p.Glu101Ala)
HGVS:
  • NC_000017.11:g.17226270T>G
  • NG_008001.2:g.15919A>C
  • NM_001353229.2:c.302A>C
  • NM_001353230.2:c.302A>C
  • NM_001353231.2:c.302A>C
  • NM_144606.7:c.302A>C
  • NM_144997.7:c.302A>CMANE SELECT
  • NP_001340158.1:p.Glu101Ala
  • NP_001340159.1:p.Glu101Ala
  • NP_001340160.1:p.Glu101Ala
  • NP_653207.1:p.Glu101Ala
  • NP_659434.2:p.Glu101Ala
  • LRG_325t1:c.302A>C
  • LRG_325:g.15919A>C
  • NC_000017.10:g.17129584T>G
  • NM_144997.5:c.302A>C
Protein change:
E101A
Links:
dbSNP: rs958255980
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs958255980
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001353229.2:c.302A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001353230.2:c.302A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001353231.2:c.302A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_144606.7:c.302A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_144997.7:c.302A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome
Synonyms:
BHD syndrome; Birt Hogg Dubé syndrome
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0800444; MedGen: C0346010; Orphanet: 122; OMIM: PS135150

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000961165Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Aug 23, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV004171385St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
criteria provided, single submitter

(St. Jude Assertion Criteria 2020)
Uncertain significance
(Nov 1, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV004199774Baylor Genetics
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Oct 25, 2023)
unknownclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedunknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240-242.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee..

Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25741868
PMCID:
PMC4544753

Details of each submission

From Invitae, SCV000961165.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 101 of the FLCN protein (p.Glu101Ala). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with FLCN-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 485597). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C35"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, SCV004171385.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

The FLCN c.302A>C (p.Glu101Ala) missense change is absent in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a deleterious effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Baylor Genetics, SCV004199774.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1unknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2024