U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1680-886A>G AND not specified

Germline classification:
Pathogenic (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Nov 16, 2017
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000781239.2

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1680-886A>G]

NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1680-886A>G

Gene:
CFTR:CF transmembrane conductance regulator [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
7q31.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1680-886A>G
Other names:
1811+1.6kbA->G; c.1679+1634A>G; 1812-886A>G; p.?
HGVS:
  • NC_000007.14:g.117589467A>G
  • NG_016465.4:g.128684A>G
  • NG_056131.3:g.2422A>G
  • NM_000492.4:c.1680-886A>GMANE SELECT
  • LRG_663t1:c.1680-886A>G
  • LRG_663:g.128684A>G
  • NC_000007.13:g.117229521A>G
  • NM_000492.3:c.1680-886A>G
Links:
dbSNP: rs397508266
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000492.4:c.1680-886A>G - intron variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001627]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000919144Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Pathogenic
(Nov 16, 2017)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (2)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A novel donor splice site in intron 11 of the CFTR gene, created by mutation 1811+1.6kbA-->G, produces a new exon: high frequency in Spanish cystic fibrosis chromosomes and association with severe phenotype.

Chillón M, Dörk T, Casals T, Giménez J, Fonknechten N, Will K, Ramos D, Nunes V, Estivill X.

Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Mar;56(3):623-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
7534040
PMCID:
PMC1801150

Defining the disease liability of variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene.

Sosnay PR, Siklosi KR, Van Goor F, Kaniecki K, Yu H, Sharma N, Ramalho AS, Amaral MD, Dorfman R, Zielenski J, Masica DL, Karchin R, Millen L, Thomas PJ, Patrinos GP, Corey M, Lewis MH, Rommens JM, Castellani C, Penland CM, Cutting GR.

Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1160-7. doi: 10.1038/ng.2745. Epub 2013 Aug 25.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
23974870
PMCID:
PMC3874936

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV000919144.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (2)

Description

Variant summary: The CFTR c.1679+1634A>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide and 4/5 splice prediction tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing (creation of a novel splicing donor site). cDNA studies proved the aberrant splicing (Chillon_1995). This variant is absent in 30882 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This variant has been reported in many affected individuals. Functional studies showed that individuals with genotype deltaF508/c.1679+1634A>G have only 1%-3% of normal CFTR mRNA. This loss of 97% of normal CFTR mRNA must be responsible for the pancreatic insufficiency and for the severe CF phenotype in these patients (Chillion_1995 and Sosnay_2013). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as pathogenic. Taken together, this variant is classified as pathogenic.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Modify your search Search (all fields optional) Clear all
Advanced Search