U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_001103.4(ACTN2):c.1864G>A (p.Asp622Asn) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Likely benign (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Sep 23, 2019
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000036887.13

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_001103.4(ACTN2):c.1864G>A (p.Asp622Asn)]

NM_001103.4(ACTN2):c.1864G>A (p.Asp622Asn)

Gene:
ACTN2:actinin alpha 2 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
1q43
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_001103.4(ACTN2):c.1864G>A (p.Asp622Asn)
Other names:
p.D622N:GAT>AAT
HGVS:
  • NC_000001.11:g.236753971G>A
  • NG_009081.2:g.94831G>A
  • NM_001103.4:c.1864G>AMANE SELECT
  • NM_001278343.2:c.1864G>A
  • NM_001278344.2:c.1240G>A
  • NP_001094.1:p.Asp622Asn
  • NP_001094.1:p.Asp622Asn
  • NP_001265272.1:p.Asp622Asn
  • NP_001265273.1:p.Asp414Asn
  • LRG_436t1:c.1864G>A
  • LRG_436:g.94831G>A
  • LRG_436p1:p.Asp622Asn
  • NC_000001.10:g.236917271G>A
  • NG_009081.1:g.72502G>A
  • NM_001103.2:c.1864G>A
  • NM_001103.3:c.1864G>A
  • c.1864G>A
Protein change:
D414N
Links:
dbSNP: rs138452803
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs138452803
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001103.4:c.1864G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001278343.2:c.1864G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001278344.2:c.1240G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
Observations:
5

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000060542Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
criteria provided, single submitter

(LMM Criteria)
Likely benign
(Jan 29, 2015)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV001362351Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Likely benign
(Sep 23, 2019)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Citation Link,

SCV001919707Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center - VKGL Data-share Consensus

See additional submitters

no assertion criteria provided
Benigngermlineclinical testing

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlinenot provided55not providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A systematic approach to assessing the clinical significance of genetic variants.

Duzkale H, Shen J, McLaughlin H, Alfares A, Kelly MA, Pugh TJ, Funke BH, Rehm HL, Lebo MS.

Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):453-63. doi: 10.1111/cge.12257.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
24033266
PMCID:
PMC3995020

Genetic basis and outcome in a nationwide study of Finnish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Jääskeläinen P, Vangipurapu J, Raivo J, Kuulasmaa T, Heliö T, Aalto-Setälä K, Kaartinen M, Ilveskoski E, Vanninen S, Hämäläinen L, Melin J, Kokkonen J, Nieminen MS; FinHCM Study Group., Laakso M, Kuusisto J.

ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):436-445. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12420. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
30775854
PMCID:
PMC6437444

Details of each submission

From Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, SCV000060542.5

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not provided5not providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

p.Asp622Asn in exon 16 of ACTN2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (33/10562) of African chromos omes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs138452803).

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlinenot providednot providednot providednot provided5not provided5not provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001362351.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Variant summary: ACTN2 c.1864G>A (p.Asp622Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Spectrin repeat domain (IPR002017) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 251418 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 9.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ACTN2 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1864G>A has been reported in the literature at-least once in sequencing studies of individuals affected with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy (Jaaskelainen_2019). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments of likely benign (n=3) and uncertain significance (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center - VKGL Data-share Consensus, SCV001919707.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024