An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet].
Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013.
Top results in this bookTable of Contents
Clinical Data as the Basic Staple of Health Learning: Creating and Protecting a Public Good: Workshop Summary.
Institute of Medicine (US) Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010.
Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2005.
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health.
Raine R, Fitzpatrick R, Barratt H, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 May. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 4.16.)
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide [Internet]. 4th edition.
Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, Dreyer NA, editors.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Sep.
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide [Internet]. 3rd edition.
Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB, editors.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Apr.
Updating Systematic Reviews.
Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Sep. (Technical Reviews, No. 16.)
Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet].
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
The assessment and appraisal of regenerative medicines and cell therapy products: an exploration of methods for review, economic evaluation and appraisal.
Hettle R, Corbett M, Hinde S, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Feb. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 21.7.)
Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 2: Diabetes Care).
Shojania KG, Ranji SR, Shaw LK, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2004 Sep. (Technical Reviews, No. 9.2.)
Empirical Evaluation of the Association Between Methodological Shortcomings and Estimates of Adverse Events.
Chou R, Fu R, Carson S, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Oct. (Technical Reviews, No. 13.)
Effects of Eicosapentanoic Acid and Docosahexanoic Acid on Mortality Across Diverse Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Prospective Cohorts: Nutritional Research Series, Vol. 4.
Trikalinos TA, Lee J, Moorthy D, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Feb. (Technical Reviews, No. 17.4.)
Neuroscience Trials of the Future: Proceedings of a Workshop.
Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Health and Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Aug 19.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on