An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
StatPearls [Internet].
Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-.
Top results in this bookTable of Contents
Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program [Internet].
Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2010-.
Management of Primary Headaches in Pregnancy [Internet].
Saldanha IJ, Roth JL, Chen KK, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Nov. (Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 234.)
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
Nursing Health Promotion [Internet].
Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, Christman E Dr, editors.
Eau Claire (WI): Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2025.
Some Thyrotropic Agents.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans.
Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2001. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 79.)
Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet].
Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013.
IRIS Toxicological Review of Inorganic Arsenic CASRN 7440-38-2.
Davis JA, Lee JS, Druwe IL, et al.
Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2025 Jan.
Developmental follow-up of children and young people born preterm.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2017 Aug. (NICE Guideline, No. 72.)
Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Smith GCS, Moraitis AA, Wastlund D, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Feb. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 25.15.)
Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 6th edition.
Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, et al., editors.
Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2003.
Evidence reviews for sepsis: Intrapartum care for women with existing medical conditions or obstetric complications and their babies: Evidence review M.
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2019 Mar. (NICE Guideline, No. 121.)
GeneReviews® [Internet].
Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors.
Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.
Does progesterone prophylaxis to prevent preterm labour improve outcome? A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (OPPTIMUM).
Norman JE, Marlow N, Messow CM, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2018 Jun. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 22.35.)
Application of Systematic Review Methods in an Overall Strategy for Evaluating Low-Dose Toxicity from Endocrine Active Chemicals.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Endocrine-Related Low-Dose Toxicity.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017 Jul 18.
Cerebral palsy in under 25s: assessment and management.
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2017 Jan. (NICE Guideline, No. 62.)
Rapid fetal fibronectin testing to predict preterm birth in women with symptoms of premature labour: a systematic review and cost analysis.
Deshpande SN, van Asselt ADI, Tomini F, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2013 Sep. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 17.40.)
National Vital Statistics Reports [Internet].
Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2024 Jul-.
Three biomarker tests to help diagnose preterm labour: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Varley-Campbell J, Mújica-Mota R, Coelho H, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Mar. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 23.13.)
Birth Settings in America: Outcomes, Quality, Access, and Choice.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on Assessing Health Outcomes by Birth Settings; Backes EP, Scrimshaw SC, editors.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2020 Feb 6.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on