An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
StatPearls [Internet].
Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-.
Top results in this bookTable of Contents
Evidence reviews for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review I.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2019 Apr. (NICE Guideline, No. 123.)
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet].
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-.
Faecal Incontinence: The Management of Faecal Incontinence in Adults.
London: National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care (UK); 2007. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 49.)
Evidence reviews for lifestyle and conservative management options for pelvic organ prolapse: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review H.
Evidence review for management of mesh complications: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review L.
Non-drug therapies for the management of chronic constipation in adults: the CapaCiTY research programme including three RCTs.
Knowles CH, Booth L, Brown SR, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Nov. (Programme Grants for Applied Research, No. 9.14.)
Nursing Health Promotion [Internet].
Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, Christman E Dr, editors.
Eau Claire (WI): Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2025.
Evidence review for assessing pelvic organ prolapse: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review G.
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study – results from the PROSPECT Study.
Glazener C, Breeman S, Elders A, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Dec. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 20.95.)
Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review Update [Internet].
Balk E, Adam GP, Kimmel H, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Aug. (Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 212.)
Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2018-2021: Diagnostic Imaging - IDKD Book [Internet].
Hodler J, Kubik-Huch RA, von Schulthess GK, editors.
Cham (CH): Springer; 2018.
Evidence review for assessing mesh complications after pelvic floor mesh surgery: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review K.
Evidence reviews for surgical and physical management of stress urinary incontinence: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review E.
Evidence review for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: Evidence review J.
Physical devices for the management of pelvic floor dysfunction: Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevention and non-surgical management: Evidence review N.
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Dec. (NICE Guideline, No. 210.)
Assessment in non-specialist care: Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevention and non-surgical management: Evidence review I.
Medical Terminology [Internet]. 2nd edition.
Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, Christman E, editors.
Eau Claire (WI): Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2024.
Clinical effectiveness of subsensory sacral neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: the SUBSoNIC crossover RCT and mechanistic study.
Vollebregt PF, Goh YL, Chan CL, et al.
Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2024 Nov. (Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation, No. 11.19.)
Benefits of aldosterone receptor antagonism in chronic kidney disease: the BARACK-D RCT.
Hobbs FDR, McManus R, Taylor C, et al.
Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2025 Mar. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 29.05.)
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on