"Immobilization" - Books

Result Filters

Results: 1 to 20 of 368 books (1888 items)

<< First< Prev

Page of 19

Next >Last >>

Select item 44036681.

StatPearls [Internet].

Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 26591822.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 53517623.

$Offer of a bandage versus rigid immobilisation in 4- to 15-year-olds with distal radius torus fractures: the FORCE equivalence RCT.$

Offer of a bandage versus rigid immobilisation in 4- to 15-year-olds with distal radius torus fractures: the FORCE equivalence RCT.

Perry DC, Achten J, Knight R, et al.; FORCE Trial Collaborators.

Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Jul. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 26.33.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 42109024.

Spinal Injury: Assessment and Initial Management.

National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK).

London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Feb. (NICE Guideline, No. 41.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 49035945.

Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Pandor A, Horner D, Davis S, et al.

Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Dec. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 23.63.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 50971546.

$Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT.$

Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT.

Dias J, Brealey S, Cook L, et al.

Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Oct. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 24.52.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 34012947.

Endotext [Internet].

Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al., editors.

South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 42100488.

Fractures (Non-Complex): Assessment and Management.

National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK).

London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Feb. (NICE Guideline, No. 38.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 34139709.

$The ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial – a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults.$

The ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial – a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults.

Handoll H, Brealey S, Rangan A, et al.

Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Mar. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 19.24.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 250723410.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy [Internet].

Tipton KN, Sullivan N, Bruening W, et al.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. (Comparative Effectiveness Technical Briefs, No. 6.)

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 145898411.

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors.

Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 483125212.

Review of the Final Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board; Committee on Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2019 Aug 15.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 482832813.

Avoidance of Physical Restraint Use among Hospitalized Older Adults: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet].

Lachance C, Wright MD.

Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 Feb 28.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 540024614.

Review of Fate, Exposure, and Effects of Sunscreens in Aquatic Environments and Implications for Sunscreen Usage and Human Health.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Ocean Studies Board; Committee on Environmental Impact of Currently Marketed Sunscreens and Potential Human Impacts of Changes in Sunscreen Usage.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2022 Aug 9.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 141528015.

Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet].

Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 166869016.

Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 6th edition.

Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, et al., editors.

Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2003.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 512728017.

Orthogeriatrics: The Management of Older Patients with Fragility Fractures [Internet]. 2nd edition.

Falaschi P, Marsh D, editors.

Cham (CH): Springer; 2021.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 502220618.

Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board; Committee on Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2020 Apr 30.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 262532819.

InformedHealth.org [Internet].

Cologne, Germany: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2006-.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

Select item 538277220.

Skills in Rheumatology [Internet].

Almoallim H, Cheikh M, editors.

Singapore: Springer; 2021.

Top results in this book Table of Contents

<< First< Prev

Page of 19

Next >Last >>

Supplemental Content

Images search in Bookshelf

Figure 5Template immobilization strategies. In emulsion PCR (a), a reaction mixture consisting of an oil–aqueous emulsion is created to encapsulate bead–DNA complexes into single aqueous droplets.

PCR amplification is performed within these droplets to create beads containing several thousand copies of the same template sequence. Solid-phase amplification (b) is composed of two basic steps: initial priming and extending of the single-stranded, single-molecule template, and bridge amplification of the immobilized template with immediately adjacent primers to form clusters. Three approaches are shown for immobilizing single-molecule templates to a solid support: immobilization by a primer (c); immobilization by a template (d); and immobilization of a polymerase (e). dNTP, 2’-deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate. Adapted from (5).

A primer on current and common sequencing technologies.

Anaya JM, Shoenfeld Y, Rojas-Villarraga A, et al., editors. Autoimmunity: From Bench to Bedside [Internet]. Bogota (Colombia): El Rosario University Press; 2013 Jul 18.
Figure 3Worm immobilization techniques in microfluidic devices.

A) Physical immobilization: compression of a membrane deflected by pressure in the control channel. The yellow layer represents a PDMS layer containing the channel for worm imaging. The green layer is a second PDMS layer on top of the worm imaging with an air-filled channel that when pressurized deflects the PDMS membrane for worm immobilization. The bottom white represents a glass slide.(Chokshi et al., 2009) Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry. B) Chemical immobilization: CO₂ diffusion through adjacent channel (Chokshi et al., 2009) Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry. C) Physical restriction in worm clamp, top view of device design. (Hulme et al., 2007) Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry. D) Physical constraint gel, worm is immobilized by gelation of surrounding fluid at physiological temperatures; scale bar is 60 µm (Krajniak and Lu, 2010) Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry. E) Cooling. Top: top view of a high-throughput imaging and sorting device that applies flow of a cooling fluid in a channel (blue) on top of the worm imaging channel (red). Green channels show valves to stop flow and worms; scale bar is 100 µm (Chung et al., 2008) Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Methods, copyright 2008. Bottom shows a side view of the same device with green valves closed.

Microfluidics as a tool for C. elegans research.

WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology [Internet]. Pasadena (CA): WormBook; 2005-2018.
Figure 14-4

Effect of immobilization stress alone and in combination with cold stress on hippocampal norepinephrine release in tyrosine- (400 mg/kg) and placebo-treated rats. Testing conditions, in 10-min intervals, are specified on the x-axis. Source: Adapted from Lieberman and Shukitt-Hale (1996).

Amino Acid and Protein Requirements: Cognitive Performance, Stress, and Brain Function.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Military Nutrition Research. The Role of Protein and Amino Acids in Sustaining and Enhancing Performance. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1999.
FIGURE 2-1Near- and mid-term budget for SLAW vitrification in conjunction with key Hanford mission facilities and operations

NOTE: DFLAW = Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste; TOC = Tank Operations Contract; WTP = Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant.
SOURCE: Reprinted by permission from the FFRDC's final draft report's Figure 1.

The Committee's Technical Review of the FFRDC's Final Draft Analysis.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board; Committee on Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Review of the Final Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2019 Aug 15.