U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Sonography Assessment of Gestational Age

; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: April 24, 2023.

Continuing Education Activity

Assessment of gestational age with sonography is a critical element of evaluating a pregnant woman in any healthcare setting. Providers caring for pregnant women should be comfortable using basic sonographic techniques to determine the gestational age of a fetus, which helps guide the care of both the fetus and the pregnant woman. This article reviews the sonographic views, images, and parameters used to determine the gestational age in pregnancy.

Objectives:

  • Describe appropriate probe and exam selection to confirm gestation age based on suspected or reported gestational age.
  • Summarize sonographic gestational age measurement techniques for the first trimester.
  • Outline sonographic gestational age measurement techniques for the second and third trimester
  • Explain how the interprofessional team can use sonographic views, images, and parameters to determine the gestational age of a pregnancy, leading to better patient outcomes.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Sonography can be used at different levels of gestational development to determine the age of the growing fetus.  Determining the correct age impacts later care of the woman and fetus, and may affect dates that determine the viability of the fetus, expected delivery date, and appropriate growth rate. The most accurate method to determine gestational age is during weeks 8 through 12 when the crown-rump length can be determined, and the fetus is in its greatest and most consistent rate of growth.[1][2] 

Earlier and later developmental time periods may also remain useful in the appropriate clinical context to confirm dates.  Conveniently, portable ultrasound machines employed at the point of care may be as accurate as higher-end machines in determining gestational age.[3]

Anatomy and Physiology

There are three identifiable structures on ultrasound that appear sequentially during the first trimester; the gestational sac, the yolk sac, and the embryonic pole.  The gestational sac appears approximately 30 days following the beginning of the last menstrual cycle.[1] It appears as a small, hypoechoic structure near the fundus of the uterus. The gestational sac represents the chorionic sac and grows approximately 1mm per day after it becomes visible.

Appearing within the gestational sac, the yolk sac is a small, circular, hyperechoic ring that appears at about day 35, or between weeks 5 and 6, counted from the beginning of the last menstrual cycle. The yolk sac also grows at about 1 mm per day until about 9 weeks, when it begins to regress.[1] The yolk sac is less useful in determining gestational age.[2]

The embryonic pole first appears as a small linear structure congruent with the yolk sac giving the appearance of a “signet ring.”  This embryonic pole is the first structure that can be measured to obtain the crown-rump length and gives an accurate date to the gestational age. The embryonic pole will develop a cephalic and caudal portion that first appears wrapped or bent tightly to the embryo.  As these begin to unfold and the limbs appear, the first true crown-rump length measurements can be obtained. The differentiation between a fetus and embryo occurs at about 9 weeks when organogenesis has completed, and the developing fetus focuses on maturation and further development of existing structures.[1]

Indications

Determining gestational age is indicated in any pregnant female with an unknown date of the last menstrual cycle to confirm estimated dates or any patient with unknown dates of gestational age.

Contraindications

There are no known contraindications to utilizing sonography to assess gestational age. However, practitioners should ensure they use the least amount of ultrasonic energy possible over the briefest time possible to determine accurate information.

Equipment

The pre-exam estimated age of gestation should guide bedside ultrasound probe selection.  A low-frequency curvilinear probe for a transabdominal method is nearly as accurate as an endovaginal exam after 6 weeks and is preferred for gestational ages greater than 8 weeks. An endocavitary probe is best utilized at an estimated gestational age of fewer than 12 weeks. As there is some overlap from 8 to 12 weeks in the ability of the probe to detect the appropriate structures, either probe may be used during this time period, and it may be necessary to utilize both probes to adequately visualize the gestational sac yolk sac and embryonic pole.  In this scenario, it is recommended to start with a curvilinear probe and transabdominal exam.  If the operator cannot visualize necessary structures, switch to the endocavitary probe and endovaginal exam.[2]

Preparation

General and routine cleaning and maintenance of the probes should be done as per the manufacturer's recommended instructions for use. Images are best obtained with the patient in a supine position when using the curvilinear probe and in the lithotomy position when using the endovaginal approach with the endocavitary probe.  For a transabdominal exam, it is recommended that the patient have a full bladder or not have voided recently to use the urine-filled bladder as an echogenic window. A small amount of gel should be applied to the curvilinear probe, and the abdominopelvic region should be scanned in the longitudinal and short axes. 

For a transvaginal exam, it is recommended that the patient empty her bladder just prior to the exam, as the cervix serves as an appropriate window with this approach, and a full bladder may displace uterine anatomy to the extent that detection and measurement of pregnancy may be difficult. The endocavitary probe is prepared by placing a small amount of ultrasound gel at the tip of the probe and placing a probe cover (which often has pre-placed ultrasound gel in place) over the endocavitary probe. Vaseline gel may then be placed over the cover before placement in the vaginal vault.

Technique or Treatment

Images of the growing fetus within the uterus are obtainable in the transverse and sagittal planes from both the curvilinear and the endocavitary probes.  Once the gestation is identified and images are obtained, there are several methods to determine gestational age, utilizing the estimated age based on last-menstrual cycle dates or physical exam.

First Trimester

The most accurate time to determine the gestational age is in the first trimester, more specifically between 8 to 12 weeks.[1][4] This timeframe marks when the quickest and most consistent growth rates occur, and gestational age can be estimated accurately to within about 5 days.[1][5] Gestational sac mean diameter and crown-rump length are used in the first trimester to determine gestational age.[2]

Gestational sac:  The gestational sac can first be seen at around 5 weeks on a transvaginal examination and 6 weeks on a transabdominal examination. It grows approximately 1 mm per day, and measurements become less accurate once it reaches a size of 14 mm.[2][6] The gestational age of the embryo is determined by measuring the mean diameter of the sac as measured from inside wall to inside wall of the sac.  If the gestational sac is not completely round, then it may be measured using three orthogonal distances from the inside of the sac using sagittal and transverse views.[1] The mean sac diameter is then either compared to a table of values, input into a regression model, or input into the ultrasound machine, determining the estimated age through pre-set calculators on an "Obstetric" setting.[7][8][9]

Crown-rump length: Of the first trimester methods, the crown-rump length is the most accurate for determining gestational age.[4] This is first measured at about 6 weeks when the embryo appears on the edge of the yolk sac as a linear hyperechoic structure. It is most accurate from 6 to 10 weeks during its most rapid and consistent growth rate. It can be measured up to about 14 weeks and is accurate within 3 to 8 days.[1][2] As the embryo develops, the measurement is taken from the outermost cephalad portion to the rump, excluding the limbs and yolk sac from the measurement. Most ultrasound machines will determine the age for the sonographer based on these measurements. If this is not an option, referencing published tables or regression models will provide this estimate.[8][10][9]

Second Trimester

Changes in growth, genetic variations, and differences in attributes of the growing fetus make the determination of gestational age within the second and third trimesters less accurate.  Using multiple methods appears to be more accurate than using a single measurement. There are five methods commonly used during these stages of development.[4][11][12]

Crown-rump length:  Crown-rump length can be measured up to about 14 weeks of gestation.  Between weeks 12 through 14, this measurement is equivalent to biparietal measurements.[10] Once the size of the crown-rump length reaches 84 mm, then the biparietal method should be used.[2] The method of measuring the crown-rump length in the second trimester is the same as described for the first trimester. The accuracy during this time period is less and can estimate gestational age accurately to within 8 days.

Biparietal Diameter:  This form of measurement is accurate to within 3 to 8 days in the first trimester and 7 to 12 days in the second and is influenced by different skull shapes.[2] Biparietal diameter is measured in an axial plane with the probe in a position that gives symmetric views of both hemispheres.  The image must contain the thalamus and cavum septi pellucidi. The ultrasound calipers should be placed on the outer edges of the skull wall that are closest to each other and on the inner skull wall on the edges farthest from each other.[2]

Head Circumference:  Head circumference is accurate within 7 to 12 days, and in the second trimester may be the most accurate. The circumference is obtained in the same plane as the Biparietal Diameter, measuring the circumference of the skull.[2]

Abdominal circumference: In the second trimester, this measurement is accurate to about 7 to 15 days. It is obtained in an axial, transverse plane at the point the portal vein bifurcates and should include the stomach.[2] Due to growth variations, flexion of the fetus, and other positioning, its accuracy has wide variability.[2]

Femur length: In the second trimester, this measurement is accurate to about 7 to 17 days.[13] It is measured with the probe perpendicular to the length of the femur, and the length of bone, not including cartilage, is measured. Its length changes based on ethnicity and can be affected by different disease processes.[2]

Third Trimester

Abdominal circumference and femur length are used in the third trimester to determine gestational age.[2][13] These measurements are obtained as described in the second trimester. During the third trimester, dating is less accurate, and repeat testing and follow-up should be done.

Abdominal Circumference: During the third trimester, the abdominal circumference is accurate to between 18 to 35 days and measured using the same method as in the second trimester.[2]

Femur length: During this trimester, the femur length is accurate to about 21 days and measured using the same method as in the second trimester.[2]

Complications

A meta-analysis from 2009 concluded that ultrasound during pregnancy is safe.[14] Some of the main complications appear to relate to the accuracy of the gestational age and the impact that may have on further care for the woman or her fetus.  It is also important to note that if an ectopic pregnancy is present, a pseudo-gestational sac may appear in the fundus of the uterus.  Measurement and misdiagnosis of this finding may mislead the healthcare team, leading to severe consequences associated with a missed ectopic pregnancy.

Clinical Significance

Obtaining the correct gestational age may have several implications in the care of the fetus.[15] This includes determining the viability of the fetus and whether certain life-saving measures should be employed. Estimated delivery dates will also determine later approaches to delivery, such as whether a c-section should be performed or induction of labor based on the earlier gestational dates obtained.  Growth rate and size determinations will also depend on correct dating.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Since gestational age is best determined in the first trimester, and particularly around week 7 of gestational age, these measurements must be documented for other providers and healthcare workers on the interprofessional team for use in the further care of the patient as the pregnancy progresses, to achieve optimal outcomes for both mother and child. [Level 5]

Point-of-care ultrasound is often utilized for this determination, and an ideal method of sharing the sonographer's finding is a transmission of the images to the patient's medical record as well as a procedure note with a detailed report of the findings. Any finding while measuring a gestational sac that that might be concerning for a pseudo-gestational sac requires further investigation to ensure an ectopic pregnancy is not present as this can be life-threatening. Interprofessional healthcare team members need to communicate and coordinate activities to ensure proper follow-up or emergent consultation if there is a concern for an ectopic pregnancy.

Review Questions

This ultrasound image demonstrates a fetal biparietal diameter and a head circumference in the second trimester with an estimated gestational age of 21 weeks 1 day and 20 weeks 2 days, respectively

Figure

This ultrasound image demonstrates a fetal biparietal diameter and a head circumference in the second trimester with an estimated gestational age of 21 weeks 1 day and 20 weeks 2 days, respectively. Contributed by Carl Skinner, MD

An ultrasound image demonstrating a fetal abdominal circumference with an estimated gestational age of 20 weeks and 2 days

Figure

An ultrasound image demonstrating a fetal abdominal circumference with an estimated gestational age of 20 weeks and 2 days. Contributed by Carl Skinner, MD

An ultrasound image showing a fetal femur measurement with estimated gestational age of 20 weeks and 2 days

Figure

An ultrasound image showing a fetal femur measurement with estimated gestational age of 20 weeks and 2 days. Contributed by Carl Skinner, MD

Measurement of this gestational sac in more than one plane helps to determine the gestational age in this ultrasound image

Figure

Measurement of this gestational sac in more than one plane helps to determine the gestational age in this ultrasound image. Contributed by Cristin Mount, MD

Crown rump length measurement taken along the length of the embryo

Figure

Crown rump length measurement taken along the length of the embryo. The circular yolk sac can be seen adjacent to the fetal pole in this ultrasound image. Contributed by Carl Skinner, MD

References

1.
Bottomley C, Bourne T. Dating and growth in the first trimester. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Aug;23(4):439-52. [PubMed: 19282247]
2.
Butt K, Lim K., DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING COMMITTEE. RETIRED: Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Feb;36(2):171-181. [PubMed: 24518917]
3.
van den Heuvel TLA, de Bruijn D, Moens-van de Moesdijk D, Beverdam A, van Ginneken B, de Korte CL. Comparison Study of Low-Cost Ultrasound Devices for Estimation of Gestational Age in Resource-Limited Countries. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Nov;44(11):2250-2260. [PubMed: 30093339]
4.
Scorza WE, Vintzileos A. First and second trimester sonography: an American perspective. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1996 May-Jun;41(3):288-92. [PubMed: 8799758]
5.
Doubilet PM. Ultrasound evaluation of the first trimester. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;52(6):1191-9. [PubMed: 25444100]
6.
Pexsters A, Daemen A, Bottomley C, Van Schoubroeck D, De Catte L, De Moor B, D'Hooghe T, Lees C, Timmerman D, Bourne T. New crown-rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;35(6):650-5. [PubMed: 20512816]
7.
Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology. 1992 Feb;182(2):501-5. [PubMed: 1732970]
8.
Pang MW, Leung TN, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Chang AM. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;22(3):271-6. [PubMed: 12942500]
9.
Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, Moll HA, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;31(4):388-96. [PubMed: 18348183]
10.
Sladkevicius P, Saltvedt S, Almström H, Kublickas M, Grunewald C, Valentin L. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;26(5):504-11. [PubMed: 16149101]
11.
March MI, Warsof SL, Chauhan SP. Fetal biometry: relevance in obstetrical practice. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;55(1):281-7. [PubMed: 22343244]
12.
Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Cheikh Ismail L, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Salomon LJ, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J., International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014 Sep 06;384(9946):869-79. [PubMed: 25209488]
13.
Egley CC, Seeds JW, Cefalo RC. Femur length versus biparietal diameter for estimating gestational age in the third trimester. Am J Perinatol. 1986 Apr;3(2):77-9. [PubMed: 3516170]
14.
Torloni MR, Vedmedovska N, Merialdi M, Betrán AP, Allen T, González R, Platt LD., ISUOG-WHO Fetal Growth Study Group. Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;33(5):599-608. [PubMed: 19291813]
15.
Skalkidou A, Kullinger M, Georgakis MK, Kieler H, Kesmodel US. Systematic misclassification of gestational age by ultrasound biometry: implications for clinical practice and research methodology in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):440-444. [PubMed: 29352467]

Disclosure: Carl Skinner declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Cristin Mount declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK570610PMID: 34033372

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...