U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Neurofeedback and Biofeedback for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Review of the Clinical Evidence and Guidelines – An Update [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2014 Aug 26.

Cover of Neurofeedback and Biofeedback for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Review of the Clinical Evidence and Guidelines – An Update

Neurofeedback and Biofeedback for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Review of the Clinical Evidence and Guidelines – An Update [Internet].

Show details

METHODS

Literature Search Strategy

A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, Medline via OVID, PsycINFO via OVID, The Cochrane Library (2014, Issue 6), University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a focused Internet search. No filters were applied to limit the retrieval by study type. The search was limited to English language documents published between Jan 1, 2012 and Jul 28, 2014.

Selection Criteria and Methods

One reviewer screened citations and selected studies. In the first level of screening, titles and abstracts were reviewed and potentially relevant articles were retrieved and assessed for inclusion. The final selection of full-text articles was based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Selection Criteria.

Table 1

Selection Criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

Articles were excluded if they did not meet the selection criteria in Table 1, if the effectiveness of one single session of biofeedback or neurofeedback therapy was assessed, if there was a lack of comparator group, if they were published prior to January 2012, if they were duplicate publications of the same study, or if they were referenced in at least one of the selected systematic reviews. Studies reporting only changes in physiological outcome variables were excluded.

Critical Appraisal of Individual Studies

The quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR.15 The quality of the included clinical trials was assessed using Downs and Black checklist.16 Numerical scores were not calculated. Instead, the strengths and limitations of individual studies are summarized and presented.

Copyright © 2014 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Copyright: This report contains CADTH copyright material and may contain material in which a third party owns copyright. This report may be used for the purposes of research or private study only. It may not be copied, posted on a web site, redistributed by email or stored on an electronic system without the prior written permission of CADTH or applicable copyright owner.

Links: This report may contain links to other information available on the websites of third parties on the Internet. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third party sites is governed by the owners’ own terms and conditions.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK253824

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (390K)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...