U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care (UK). Low Back Pain: Early Management of Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain [Internet]. London: Royal College of General Practitioners (UK); 2009 May. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 88.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Low Back Pain

Low Back Pain: Early Management of Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain [Internet].

Show details

Preface

It is perhaps fitting that the last guideline produced by the National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care prior to its merger with related NICE guidelines groups, should cover the same disorder that the RCGP published as its first comprehensive evidence based guideline over a decade ago: the early management of non-specific low back pain.

Longer-term non-specific back pain remains a common problem for practitioners to deal with, particularly in primary care, occupational health and musculo-skeletal services. It still represents a major cause of sickness absence from work- remaining the largest single cause in Scandinavia, only exceeded by mild to moderate mental health problems in the UK.

It is gratifying to observe how dramatically the number of high quality RCTs on interventions for NSLPB has increased over the last ten years. At last we are able to make treatment recommendations for people with continuing back pain that are likely to generate real patient benefits. Building on this, the authors of this guideline have produced a simple care pathway for those with back pain that will reduce the multiplicity of different treatment approaches, many unproven, that are in use by the NHS.

However, whilst these guidelines demonstrate the quality and extent of evidence covering a wide range of interventions, covering most day to day clinical queries and decisions within the field, much of the detail remains unanswered, highlighted in the evidence to recommendations sections at the end of the chapters. The group have identified six key research questions: screening, education, sequential v single interventions, psychological therapy, invasive procedures, and TENS. Robust evidence is increasingly sought by NHS commissioners to underpin significant investment. Whilst a lack of evidence of effectiveness doesn’t equate with evidence of ineffectiveness, it is only sensible that, investment in back pain treatments should support those interventions for which effectiveness is supported by good quality research.

Professor Mark B Gabbay, MD, FRCGP, National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care Board

Copyright © 2009, Royal College of General Practitioners.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright owner. Applications for the copyright owner’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher.

Bookshelf ID: NBK11708

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (980K)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...