U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Sobieraj DM, White CM, Kluger J, et al. Adjunctive Devices for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Dec. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 42.)

Cover of Adjunctive Devices for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Adjunctive Devices for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Internet].

Show details

Appendix CCharacteristics and Quality Assessment of Included Trials, Studies and Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses

Table 1. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating catheter aspiration devices versus control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 64K)

Table 2. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating mechanical thrombectomy devices versus control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 49K)

Table 3. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating distal filter embolic protection devices versus control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 51K)

Table 4. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating distal balloon embolic protection devices versus control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 53K)

Table 5. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating proximal balloon embolic protection devices versus control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 44K)

Table 6. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating thrombectomy or distal protection devices versus control in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 45K)

Table 7. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials evaluating thrombectomy or distal protection devices versus control in the mixed acute coronary syndrome population (MS Word, 50K)

Table 8. Characteristics and quality assessment of direct comparative randomized controlled trials in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 44K)

Table 9. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials with selective inclusion/exclusion criteria in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 44K)

Table 10. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials with unique comparisons in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MS Word, 43K)

Table 11. Characteristics and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials with unique comparisons in patients with mixed acute coronary syndrome (MS Word, 44K)

Table 12. Characteristics and quality assessment of controlled observational studies (MS Word, 50K)

Table 13. Characteristics and quality assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analysis published as full text (MS Word, 60K)

Table 14. Characteristics and quality assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in abstract form (MS Word, 45K)

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (4.2M)

Other titles in these collections

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...